SLDE
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$2.14B
5Y Perf.-13.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SLDE vs CB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CB
Chubb Limited
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$125.61B
5Y Perf.+11.1%
SLDE vs CB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SLDE | CB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $2.14B | $125.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $59.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $491M | $10.31B |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | 51.5% | 21.8% |
| Forward P/E | 5.3x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $22.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $2.47B |
SLDE vs CB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SLDE
CB
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slide Insurance Hol… (SLDE) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| Chubb Limited (CB) | 100 | 111.1 | +11.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLDE vs CB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SLDE leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Chubb Limited is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SLDE
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
The Insurance Pick
SLDE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.5%, EPS growth 108.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 68.3%
- 36.5% revenue growth vs CB's 6.5%
- Lower P/E (5.3x vs 11.9x)
Best for: growth exposure
CB
Chubb Limited
The Insurance Pick
CB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 189.4% 10Y total return vs SLDE's -7.5%
- 1.2% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +12.7% vs SLDE's -7.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLDE | 36.5% revenue growth vs CB's 6.5% |
| Value | SLDE | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 11.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | SLDE | Combined ratio 0.5 vs CB's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) |
| Dividends | CB | 1.2% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CB | +12.7% vs SLDE's -7.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SLDE | 23.9% ROA vs CB's 4.0% |
SLDE vs CB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
SLDE vs CB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSLDELAGGINGCB
CBChubb Limited
2leads
SLDESlide Insurance Holdi…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SLDE6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SLDE5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SLDE5/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CB6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CB2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLDE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CB is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.8B annually — 47.3x SLDE's $1.3B. SLDE is the more profitable business, keeping 38.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CB's 17.2%. On growth, SLDE holds the edge at +38.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SLDESlide Insurance H… | CBChubb Limited |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $59.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $645M | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $491M | $10.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $987M | $13.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +21.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +38.9% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +22.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.2% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | +28.0% |
SLDE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SLDE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, SLDE trades at a 55% valuation discount to CB's 12.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLDE's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CB's 10.9x.
| Metric | SLDESlide Insurance H… | CBChubb Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $125.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $145.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.58x | 12.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.29x | 11.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.66x | 10.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 2.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.70x | 8.64x |
SLDE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLDE delivers a 66.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $67 in annual profit, vs $14 for CB. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CB scores 7/9 vs SLDE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SLDESlide Insurance H… | CBChubb Limited |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +66.7% | +13.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.9% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $19.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $22.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 184.25x | 18.07x |
SLDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CB five years ago would be worth $19,590 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,254 for SLDE. Over the past 12 months, CB leads with a +12.7% total return vs SLDE's -7.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CB at 18.6% vs SLDE's -2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SLDESlide Insurance H… | CBChubb Limited |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.5% | +12.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | +66.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | +95.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | +189.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.6% | +18.6% |
CB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CB is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLDE's 0.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CB currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs SLDE's 72.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SLDESlide Insurance H… | CBChubb Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.90 | $345.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.53 | $264.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.4% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 1.6M |
CB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SLDE as "Buy" and CB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.7% upside for SLDE (target: $26) vs 7.0% for CB (target: $344). CB is the only dividend payer here at 1.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SLDESlide Insurance H… | CBChubb Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $344.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +2.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SLDE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CB leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallSlide Insurance Holdings, I… (SLDE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SLDE vs CB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLDE or CB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (SLDE) is the stronger pick with 36. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for Chubb Limited (CB). Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (SLDE) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (5. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (SLDE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLDE or CB?
On trailing P/E, Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (SLDE) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Chubb Limited at 12. 5x. On forward P/E, Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock is actually cheaper at 5. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLDE or CB?
Over the past 5 years, Chubb Limited (CB) delivered a total return of +95.
9%, compared to -7. 5% for Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (SLDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CB returned +189. 4% versus SLDE's -7. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLDE or CB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chubb Limited (CB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
01β versus Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock's 0. 59β — meaning SLDE is approximately -10967% more volatile than CB relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SLDE or CB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (SLDE) is pulling ahead at 36. 5% versus 6. 5% for Chubb Limited (CB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 108. 7% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Chubb Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLDE leads at 68. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLDE or CB?
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (SLDE) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 4% net margin versus 17. 2% for Chubb Limited — meaning it keeps 38. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLDE leads at 51. 0% versus 21. 8% for CB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLDE leads at 79. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLDE or CB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (SLDE) trades at 5. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Chubb Limited — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLDE: 38. 7% to $26. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLDE or CB?
In this comparison, CB (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SLDE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLDE or CB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chubb Limited (CB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
01), 1. 2% yield, +189. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CB: +189. 4%, SLDE: -7. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLDE and CB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLDE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CB is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CB pays a dividend while SLDE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SLDE: 38.2% · CB: 7.9%)Net Margin>
%
(SLDE: 38.9% · CB: 17.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SLDE: 5.6x · CB: 12.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.