Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLDP vs GM vs F vs BLNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Engineering & Construction
SLDP vs GM vs F vs BLNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $635K | $70.70B | $47.73B | $91M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $184.62B | $189.86B | $106M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-91M | $2.54B | $-6.11B | $-126M |
| Gross Margin | -27.7% | 6.1% | 9.2% | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 1.3% | 1.8% | -119.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.2x | 7.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $130.28B | $167.57B | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $20.95B | $23.36B | $42M |
SLDP vs GM vs F vs BLNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 100 | 83.8 | -16.2% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLDP vs GM vs F vs BLNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 5.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.93, Low D/E 2.0%, current ratio 15.92x
- 8.0% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
- +143.3% vs BLNK's +4.8%
GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 180.2% 10Y total return vs F's 36.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.4% margin vs SLDP's -485.5%
- 0.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 1.3% vs -109.7%
F is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 6.2%
- Beta 0.97, yield 6.2%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.97 vs BLNK's 2.96
- 6.2% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BLNK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs SLDP's -485.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs BLNK's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.3% vs BLNK's +4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 1.3% vs -109.7% |
SLDP vs GM vs F vs BLNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLDP vs GM vs F vs BLNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GM leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLDP leads 0 • F leads 0 • BLNK leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GM and F and BLNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
F is the larger business by revenue, generating $189.9B annually — 10096.8x SLDP's $19M. GM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLDP's -4.9%. On growth, BLNK holds the edge at +11.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $184.6B | $189.9B | $106M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$83M | $15.5B | $10.0B | -$115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | $2.5B | -$6.1B | -$126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | $12.5B | $11.9B | -$47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +6.1% | +9.2% | +26.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +1.3% | +1.8% | -119.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +1.4% | -3.2% | -118.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +6.8% | +6.3% | -44.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.9% | -0.9% | +6.4% | +11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | -15.2% | +4.3% | +99.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GM's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than F's 22.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $634,513 | $70.7B | $47.7B | $91M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$38M | $180.0B | $191.9B | $60M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.73x | 23.98x | -5.91x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.22x | 7.72x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.29x | 22.51x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 0.38x | 0.25x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 1.21x | 1.35x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.38x | 3.83x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GM delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-132 for BLNK. SLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.6% | +3.8% | -14.7% | -131.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.5% | +0.9% | -2.1% | -66.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.6% | +1.3% | +1.0% | -109.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.2% | +1.6% | +1.4% | -77.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 2.06x | 4.66x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | $109.3B | $144.2B | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $20.9B | $23.4B | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $130.3B | $167.6B | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -488.79x | 2.60x | 0.93x | -9064.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $13,592 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $244 for BLNK. Over the past 12 months, SLDP leads with a +143.3% total return vs BLNK's +4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 33.4% vs BLNK's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.2% | -3.0% | -7.6% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +143.3% | +73.8% | +24.3% | +4.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.9% | +137.4% | +17.8% | -88.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.8% | +35.9% | +32.9% | -97.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.8% | +180.2% | +36.2% | -97.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +33.4% | +5.6% | -51.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
F is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.93x | 1.07x | 0.97x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.86 | $87.62 | $14.80 | $2.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.12 | $44.97 | $9.88 | $0.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.0% | +89.5% | +82.3% | +29.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 55.4 | 49.3 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 6.7M | 42.5M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLDP as "Buy", GM as "Buy", F as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.0% upside for GM (target: $92) vs 14.6% for F (target: $14). For income investors, F offers the higher dividend yield at 6.17% vs GM's 0.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $91.75 | $13.96 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 51 | 46 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +6.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 | $0.75 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +8.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
SLDP vs GM vs F vs BLNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLDP or GM or F or BLNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Solid Power, Inc.
(SLDP) is the stronger pick with 8. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLDP or GM or F or BLNK?
On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLDP or GM or F or BLNK?
Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +35.
9%, compared to -97. 6% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +180. 2% versus BLNK's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLDP or GM or F or BLNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ford Motor Company (F) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately 205% more volatile than F relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLDP or GM or F or BLNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Solid Power, Inc.
(SLDP) is pulling ahead at 8. 0% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blink Charging Co. grew EPS 38. 9% year-over-year, compared to -241. 1% for Ford Motor Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLDP or GM or F or BLNK?
General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
5% net margin versus -429. 5% for Solid Power, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1. 6% versus -463. 7% for SLDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLNK leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLDP or GM or F or BLNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
2x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Ford Motor Company — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GM: 17. 0% to $91. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLDP or GM or F or BLNK?
In this comparison, F (6.
2% yield), GM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SLDP, BLNK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLDP or GM or F or BLNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 0. 9% yield, +180. 2% 10Y return). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +180. 2%, BLNK: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLDP and GM and F and BLNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLDP (Industrials) and GM (Consumer Cyclical) and F (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SLDP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GM, F pay a dividend while SLDP, BLNK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.