Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SLE
Super League Enterprise, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
RBLX
Roblox Corporation

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.00B
5Y Perf.-35.4%
U
Unity Software Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.29B
5Y Perf.-71.9%
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$46.03B
5Y Perf.+24.8%
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.16B
5Y Perf.+48.1%

SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SLE logoSLE
RBLX logoRBLX
U logoU
TTWO logoTTWO
EA logoEA
IndustryInternet Content & InformationElectronic Gaming & MultimediaSoftware - ApplicationElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$38M$30.00B$12.29B$46.03B$50.16B
Revenue (TTM)$12M$5.30B$1.92B$6.56B$7.53B
Net Income (TTM)$-3.57B$-1.10B$-672M$-3.96B$887M
Gross Margin93.7%78.5%59.4%55.3%79.0%
Operating Margin-264.7%-24.0%-36.1%-59.3%15.4%
Forward P/E56.5x23.3x
Total Debt$5M$1.64B$2.39B$4.11B$1.49B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$1.21B$2.06B$1.46B$2.86B

SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SLE
RBLX
U
TTWO
EA
StockMar 21May 26Return
Super League Enterp… (SLE)1000.0-100.0%
Roblox Corporation (RBLX)10064.6-35.4%
Unity Software Inc. (U)10028.1-71.9%
Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO)100124.8+24.8%
Electronic Arts Inc. (EA)100148.1+48.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EA leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Roblox Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. U also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SLE
Super League Enterprise, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

SLE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
RBLX
Roblox Corporation
The Growth Play

RBLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
  • 35.8% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5%
Best for: growth exposure
U
Unity Software Inc.
The Momentum Pick

U ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +36.4% vs SLE's -97.3%
Best for: momentum
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.4% 10Y total return vs EA's 217.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
The Income Pick

EA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 0.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
  • Beta 0.15, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.05x
  • Lower P/E (23.3x vs 56.5x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRBLX logoRBLX35.8% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5%
ValueEA logoEALower P/E (23.3x vs 56.5x)
Quality / MarginsEA logoEA11.8% margin vs SLE's -309.0%
Stability / SafetyEA logoEABeta 0.15 vs U's 2.37, lower leverage
DividendsEA logoEA0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)U logoU+36.4% vs SLE's -97.3%
Efficiency (ROA)EA logoEA7.1% ROA vs SLE's -410.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs -358.2%

SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SLESuper League Enterprise, Inc.
FY 2024
Advertising and Sponsorships
88.4%$7M
Direct to Consumer
11.6%$879,000
RBLXRoblox Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

UUnity Software Inc.
FY 2025
Grow Solutions
66.4%$1.2B
Create Solutions
33.6%$621M
TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobile
52.2%$2.9B
Console
37.3%$2.1B
P C And Other Products
10.5%$593M
EAElectronic Arts Inc.
FY 2025
Live services and other, net revenue
73.2%$5.5B
Full game downloads, net revenue
19.8%$1.5B
Packaged goods, net revenue
7.0%$524M

SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEALAGGINGU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EA is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 651.0x SLE's $12M. EA is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLE's -309.0%. On growth, RBLX holds the edge at +39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSLE logoSLESuper League Ente…RBLX logoRBLXRoblox CorporationU logoUUnity Software In…TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12M$5.3B$1.9B$6.6B$7.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2.5B-$1.1B-$329M-$2.7B$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3.6B-$1.1B-$672M-$4.0B$887M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M$1.6B$463M$488M$2.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.7%+78.5%+59.4%+55.3%+79.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-264.7%-24.0%-36.1%-59.3%+15.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-309.0%-20.7%-35.0%-60.4%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-89.3%+31.0%+24.1%+7.4%+30.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-45.3%+39.3%+16.8%+24.9%+11.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.9%-9.4%-3.2%+29.6%+90.6%
EA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, EA's 39.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than U's 328.8x.

MetricSLE logoSLESuper League Ente…RBLX logoRBLXRoblox CorporationU logoUUnity Software In…TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…
Market CapShares × price$38M$30.0B$12.3B$46.0B$50.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$30.4B$12.6B$48.7B$48.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.80x-27.21x-29.33x-8.62x57.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.56.48x23.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate13.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple328.81x39.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.34x6.13x6.64x8.17x6.66x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share222.46x77.07x3.40x18.06x7.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.17x30.42x21.59x
EA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

EA delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SLE. EA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLE's 29.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBLX scores 6/9 vs TTWO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSLE logoSLESuper League Ente…RBLX logoRBLXRoblox CorporationU logoUUnity Software In…TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.3%-2.9%-19.8%-113.4%+14.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-410.7%-12.2%-10.0%-39.6%+7.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.6%-87.7%-7.8%-49.8%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.5%-31.0%-7.6%-57.1%+12.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936636
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage29.26x4.36x0.68x1.92x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M$431M$330M$2.6B-$1.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$1.2B$2.1B$1.5B$2.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$1.6B$2.4B$4.1B$1.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.53x-27.89x-54.53x-69.94x
EA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TTWO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EA five years ago would be worth $14,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SLE. Over the past 12 months, U leads with a +36.4% total return vs SLE's -97.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 20.6% vs SLE's -90.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSLE logoSLESuper League Ente…RBLX logoRBLXRoblox CorporationU logoUUnity Software In…TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-47.7%-48.2%-36.4%-12.4%-1.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.3%-40.2%+36.4%-2.2%+29.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+15.5%-0.7%+75.4%+61.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-34.5%-65.5%+30.4%+45.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-39.7%-58.8%+535.5%+217.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-90.7%+4.9%-0.2%+20.6%+17.3%
TTWO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than U's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs SLE's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSLE logoSLESuper League Ente…RBLX logoRBLXRoblox CorporationU logoUUnity Software In…TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x1.40x2.37x0.70x0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$196.80$150.59$52.15$264.79$204.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.22$41.66$16.78$187.63$141.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.1%+27.8%+54.0%+83.3%+97.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.431.659.963.935.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded18K9.3M13.7M1.6M1.8M
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

EA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: RBLX as "Buy", U as "Buy", TTWO as "Buy", EA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 109.1% upside for RBLX (target: $88) vs -13.9% for EA (target: $173). EA is the only dividend payer here at 0.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSLE logoSLESuper League Ente…RBLX logoRBLXRoblox CorporationU logoUUnity Software In…TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$87.63$35.71$290.00$172.65
# AnalystsCovering analysts37265666
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.75
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.1%
EA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

EA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TTWO leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallElectronic Arts Inc. (EA)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the stronger pick with 35.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) offers the better valuation at 57. 1x trailing P/E (23. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roblox Corporation (RBLX) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?

On forward P/E, Electronic Arts Inc.

is actually cheaper at 23. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?

Over the past 5 years, Electronic Arts Inc.

(EA) delivered a total return of +45. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTWO returned +535. 5% versus SLE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.

(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Unity Software Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning U is approximately 1465% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 29% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is pulling ahead at 35.

8% versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super League Enterprise, Inc. grew EPS 82. 8% year-over-year, compared to -17. 0% for Electronic Arts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBLX leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?

Electronic Arts Inc.

(EA) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -102. 8% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EA leads at 15. 4% versus -103. 5% for SLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EA leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Electronic Arts Inc.

(EA) trades at 23. 3x forward P/E versus 56. 5x for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — 33. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBLX: 109. 1% to $87. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?

In this comparison, EA (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. SLE, RBLX, U, TTWO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Electronic Arts Inc.

(EA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), +217. 0% 10Y return). Unity Software Inc. (U) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EA: +217. 0%, U: -58. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SLE and RBLX and U and TTWO and EA?

These companies operate in different sectors (SLE (Communication Services) and RBLX (Technology) and U (Technology) and TTWO (Technology) and EA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RBLX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; U is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SLE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 5619%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RBLX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

U

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TTWO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SLE and RBLX and U and TTWO and EA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SLE: -45.3% · RBLX: 39.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.