Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Software - Application
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Software - Application | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $38M | $30.00B | $12.29B | $46.03B | $50.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $5.30B | $1.92B | $6.56B | $7.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.57B | $-1.10B | $-672M | $-3.96B | $887M |
| Gross Margin | 93.7% | 78.5% | 59.4% | 55.3% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | -264.7% | -24.0% | -36.1% | -59.3% | 15.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 56.5x | 23.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1.64B | $2.39B | $4.11B | $1.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.21B | $2.06B | $1.46B | $2.86B |
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super League Enterp… (SLE) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Roblox Corporation (RBLX) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Unity Software Inc. (U) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RBLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- 35.8% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5%
U ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +36.4% vs SLE's -97.3%
TTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs EA's 217.0%
EA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.15, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.05x
- Lower P/E (23.3x vs 56.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.3x vs 56.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs SLE's -309.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs U's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.4% vs SLE's -97.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs SLE's -410.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs -358.2% |
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EA leads in 5 of 6 categories
TTWO leads 1 • SLE leads 0 • RBLX leads 0 • U leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EA is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 651.0x SLE's $12M. EA is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLE's -309.0%. On growth, RBLX holds the edge at +39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $5.3B | $1.9B | $6.6B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.5B | -$1.1B | -$329M | -$2.7B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.6B | -$1.1B | -$672M | -$4.0B | $887M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $1.6B | $463M | $488M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.7% | +78.5% | +59.4% | +55.3% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -264.7% | -24.0% | -36.1% | -59.3% | +15.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -309.0% | -20.7% | -35.0% | -60.4% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | +31.0% | +24.1% | +7.4% | +30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.3% | +39.3% | +16.8% | +24.9% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | -9.4% | -3.2% | +29.6% | +90.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EA's 39.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than U's 328.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $30.0B | $12.3B | $46.0B | $50.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $30.4B | $12.6B | $48.7B | $48.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.80x | -27.21x | -29.33x | -8.62x | 57.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 56.48x | 23.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 13.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 328.81x | — | 39.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.34x | 6.13x | 6.64x | 8.17x | 6.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 222.46x | 77.07x | 3.40x | 18.06x | 7.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.17x | 30.42x | — | 21.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EA delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SLE. EA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLE's 29.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBLX scores 6/9 vs TTWO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -2.9% | -19.8% | -113.4% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -410.7% | -12.2% | -10.0% | -39.6% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | -87.7% | -7.8% | -49.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -31.0% | -7.6% | -57.1% | +12.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 29.26x | 4.36x | 0.68x | 1.92x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $431M | $330M | $2.6B | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.2B | $2.1B | $1.5B | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1.6B | $2.4B | $4.1B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.53x | -27.89x | -54.53x | -69.94x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTWO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EA five years ago would be worth $14,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SLE. Over the past 12 months, U leads with a +36.4% total return vs SLE's -97.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 20.6% vs SLE's -90.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.7% | -48.2% | -36.4% | -12.4% | -1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.3% | -40.2% | +36.4% | -2.2% | +29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +15.5% | -0.7% | +75.4% | +61.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -34.5% | -65.5% | +30.4% | +45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -39.7% | -58.8% | +535.5% | +217.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.7% | +4.9% | -0.2% | +20.6% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than U's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs SLE's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.40x | 2.37x | 0.70x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $196.80 | $150.59 | $52.15 | $264.79 | $204.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.22 | $41.66 | $16.78 | $187.63 | $141.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +27.8% | +54.0% | +83.3% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 31.6 | 59.9 | 63.9 | 35.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 9.3M | 13.7M | 1.6M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
EA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RBLX as "Buy", U as "Buy", TTWO as "Buy", EA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 109.1% upside for RBLX (target: $88) vs -13.9% for EA (target: $173). EA is the only dividend payer here at 0.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.63 | $35.71 | $290.00 | $172.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 26 | 56 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
EA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TTWO leads in 1 (Total Returns).
SLE vs RBLX vs U vs TTWO vs EA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) offers the better valuation at 57. 1x trailing P/E (23. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roblox Corporation (RBLX) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?
On forward P/E, Electronic Arts Inc.
is actually cheaper at 23. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?
Over the past 5 years, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) delivered a total return of +45. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTWO returned +535. 5% versus SLE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Unity Software Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning U is approximately 1465% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 29% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super League Enterprise, Inc. grew EPS 82. 8% year-over-year, compared to -17. 0% for Electronic Arts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBLX leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?
Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -102. 8% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EA leads at 15. 4% versus -103. 5% for SLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EA leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) trades at 23. 3x forward P/E versus 56. 5x for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — 33. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBLX: 109. 1% to $87. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA?
In this comparison, EA (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SLE, RBLX, U, TTWO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLE or RBLX or U or TTWO or EA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), +217. 0% 10Y return). Unity Software Inc. (U) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EA: +217. 0%, U: -58. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLE and RBLX and U and TTWO and EA?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLE (Communication Services) and RBLX (Technology) and U (Technology) and TTWO (Technology) and EA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RBLX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; U is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.