Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLE vs TTWO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
SLE vs TTWO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $37M | $46.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $6.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.57B | $-3.96B |
| Gross Margin | 93.7% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | -264.7% | -59.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 57.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $4.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.46B |
SLE vs TTWO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super League Enterp… (SLE) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 164.1 | +64.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLE vs TTWO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.57
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 0.54x
TTWO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -16.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs SLE's -100.0%
- 5.3% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -60.4% margin vs SLE's -309.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs TTWO's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.3% vs SLE's -97.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -39.6% ROA vs SLE's -410.7%, ROIC -49.8% vs -358.2% |
SLE vs TTWO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLE vs TTWO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTWO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTWO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 567.0x SLE's $12M. TTWO is the more profitable business, keeping -60.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLE's -309.0%. On growth, TTWO holds the edge at +24.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.5B | -$2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.6B | -$4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $488M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.7% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -264.7% | -59.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -309.0% | -60.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.3% | +24.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TTWO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $46.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $49.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.78x | -8.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 57.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 220.35x | 18.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTWO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TTWO delivers a -113.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-113 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SLE. TTWO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLE's 29.26x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -113.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -410.7% | -39.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | -49.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -57.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 29.26x | 1.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.53x | -69.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTWO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTWO five years ago would be worth $13,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SLE. Over the past 12 months, TTWO leads with a -1.3% total return vs SLE's -97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 21.2% vs SLE's -90.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.2% | -11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.5% | -1.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +77.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +544.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.7% | +21.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLE and TTWO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTWO's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TTWO currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs SLE's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $196.80 | $264.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.22 | $187.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +84.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $291.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TTWO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
SLE vs TTWO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLE or TTWO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Analysts rate Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLE or TTWO?
Over the past 5 years, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) delivered a total return of +31. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTWO returned +544. 3% versus SLE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLE or TTWO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Super League Enterprise, Inc.
(SLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning TTWO is approximately 11% more volatile than SLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 192% versus 29% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLE or TTWO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super League Enterprise, Inc. grew EPS 82. 8% year-over-year, compared to -16. 2% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTWO leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLE or TTWO?
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the more profitable company, earning -79. 5% net margin versus -102. 8% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — meaning it keeps -79. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTWO leads at -77. 9% versus -103. 5% for SLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTWO leads at 54. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SLE or TTWO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SLE or TTWO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +544. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTWO: +544. 3%, SLE: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SLE and TTWO?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLE (Communication Services) and TTWO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.