Trucking
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGB vs GLBE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
SLGB vs GLBE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $21M | $5.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $962M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $68M |
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 45.3% |
| Operating Margin | -280.0% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.9x |
| Total Debt | $6K | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $929.00 | $246M |
Quick Verdict: SLGB vs GLBE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.31
- Rev growth 815.0%, EPS growth -41.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 0.23x
GLBE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 22.4% 10Y total return vs SLGB's -90.4%
- 7.1% margin vs SLGB's -382.5%
- -14.5% vs SLGB's -90.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 815.0% revenue growth vs GLBE's 27.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs SLGB's -382.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs GLBE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -14.5% vs SLGB's -90.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs SLGB's -355.7% |
SLGB vs GLBE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLGB vs GLBE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLBE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLBE is the larger business by revenue, generating $962M annually — 61.8x SLGB's $16M. GLBE is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGB's -3.8%. On growth, SLGB holds the edge at +106.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $962M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | $130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $295M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +45.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.7% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | +28.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
Valuation Metrics
SLGB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.71x | 80.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 54.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 5.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLBE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLBE delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-7672 for SLGB. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBE scores 6/9 vs SLGB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7672.3% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5,214 | -$204M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $929 | $246M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6,143 | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLBE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLBE five years ago would be worth $12,243 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $960 for SLGB. Over the past 12 months, GLBE leads with a -14.5% total return vs SLGB's -90.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLBE at -0.1% vs SLGB's -54.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -62.7% | -17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.4% | -14.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.4% | -0.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.4% | +22.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.4% | +22.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.2% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLGB and GLBE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGB is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLBE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLBE currently trades 72.3% from its 52-week high vs SLGB's 8.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $43.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $27.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.3% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.3 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 420K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
GLBE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SLGB vs GLBE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGB or GLBE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the stronger pick with 815.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 8% for Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE). Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) offers the better valuation at 80. 1x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLGB or GLBE?
Over the past 5 years, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) delivered a total return of +22. 4%, compared to -90. 4% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLBE returned +22. 4% versus SLGB's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLGB or GLBE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
31β versus Global-e Online Ltd. 's 1. 63β — meaning GLBE is approximately 24% more volatile than SLGB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SLGB or GLBE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is pulling ahead at 815.
0% versus 27. 8% for Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLGB or GLBE?
Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -172. 1% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLBE leads at 7. 4% versus -34. 5% for SLGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLBE leads at 45. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SLGB or GLBE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SLGB or GLBE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGB: -90. 4%, GLBE: +22. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SLGB and GLBE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLGB (Industrials) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.