Trucking
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGB vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
SLGB vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $25M | $529.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | -280.0% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $6K | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $929.00 | $24.81B |
Quick Verdict: SLGB vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.31
- Rev growth 815.0%, EPS growth -41.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 0.23x
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -78.8% 10Y total return vs SLGB's -88.9%
- +73.1% vs SLGB's -88.9%
- -47.3% ROA vs SLGB's -355.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 815.0% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -382.5% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.1% vs SLGB's -88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -47.3% ROA vs SLGB's -355.7% |
SLGB vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLGB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPIR is the larger business by revenue, generating $72M annually — 4.6x SLGB's $16M. SLGB is the more profitable business, keeping -3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, SLGB holds the edge at +106.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.7% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SLGB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $529.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $513.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.83x | 10.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 7405.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR delivers a -88.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-88 in annual profit, vs $-7672 for SLGB. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs SLGB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7672.3% | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5,214 | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $929 | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6,143 | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPIR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPIR five years ago would be worth $2,035 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,114 for SLGB. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +73.1% total return vs SLGB's -88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 43.9% vs SLGB's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.8% | +106.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -88.9% | +73.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | +198.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -79.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.9% | +43.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLGB and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGB is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs SLGB's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.7% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.7 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 421K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SLGB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPIR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SLGB vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGB or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the stronger pick with 815.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLGB or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) delivered a total return of -79. 6%, compared to -88. 9% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPIR returned -78. 8% versus SLGB's -88. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLGB or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
31β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 123% more volatile than SLGB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SLGB or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is pulling ahead at 815.
0% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLGB or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -172. 1% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLGB leads at -34. 5% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SLGB or SPIR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SLGB or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGB: -88. 9%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SLGB and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLGB is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.