Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGL vs PRGO vs HLN vs DERM vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Distribution
SLGL vs PRGO vs HLN vs DERM vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $194M | $1.61B | $41.45B | $102M | $92.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $4.18B | $22.01B | $56M | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-1.82B | $3.18B | $-9M | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | -153.5% | 34.2% | 63.9% | 67.5% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -256.2% | -4.1% | 21.4% | -12.2% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.6x | 22.2x | 69.0x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $991K | $3.97B | $8.59B | $26M | $7.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $532M | $1.32B | $20M | $5.69B |
SLGL vs PRGO vs HLN vs DERM vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol-Gel Technologie… (SLGL) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 28.0 | -72.0% |
| Haleon plc (HLN) | 100 | 132.4 | +32.4% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 134.0 | +34.0% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 220.2 | +120.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLGL vs PRGO vs HLN vs DERM vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 68.0% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
- +8.0% vs PRGO's -51.2%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.18, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 69.0x)
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HLN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 52.2%, current ratio 0.92x
- 14.5% margin vs SLGL's -227.4%
- 10.0% ROA vs SLGL's -33.7%, ROIC 7.6% vs -48.6%
Among these 5 stocks, DERM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MCK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
- 348.1% 10Y total return vs HLN's 31.7%
- PEG 0.49 vs HLN's 2.63
- Beta 0.04 vs DERM's 1.82
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.0% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 69.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs SLGL's -227.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs DERM's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.0% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs SLGL's -33.7%, ROIC 7.6% vs -48.6% |
SLGL vs PRGO vs HLN vs DERM vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLGL vs PRGO vs HLN vs DERM vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HLN leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 1 • MCK leads 1 • SLGL leads 0 • DERM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $403.4B annually — 61507.9x SLGL's $7M. HLN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGL's -2.3%. On growth, SLGL holds the edge at +8.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $4.2B | $22.0B | $56M | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $58M | $5.3B | -$3M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$1.8B | $3.2B | -$9M | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $108M | $3.1B | -$3M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -153.5% | +34.2% | +63.9% | +67.5% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -4.1% | +21.4% | -12.2% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -43.5% | +14.5% | -15.5% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +2.6% | +14.2% | -4.8% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.1% | -7.2% | -0.4% | +1.0% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.2% | -56.4% | +18.8% | +5.9% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, HLN trades at a 35% valuation discount to MCK's 29.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCK offers better value at 0.75x vs HLN's 2.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $194M | $1.6B | $41.4B | $102M | $92.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $184M | $5.1B | $51.3B | $108M | $93.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.61x | -1.14x | 19.01x | -6.94x | 29.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.56x | 22.22x | 68.97x | 19.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.25x | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.42x | 13.62x | — | 18.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.99x | 0.38x | 2.83x | 1.82x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.49x | 0.55x | 1.87x | 5.09x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 704.54x | 11.12x | 15.47x | — | 17.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-51 for PRGO. SLGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLN scores 8/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.0% | -50.7% | +19.9% | -45.4% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.7% | -19.8% | +10.0% | -10.8% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.6% | +3.7% | +7.6% | -56.8% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | +4.3% | +8.6% | -34.2% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.35x | 0.52x | 1.28x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $3.4B | $7.3B | $5M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $532M | $1.3B | $20M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $991,000 | $4.0B | $8.6B | $26M | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -7.20x | 7.80x | -1.52x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SLGL and DERM and MCK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $38,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,986 for PRGO. Over the past 12 months, SLGL leads with a +800.8% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 44.7% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +65.0% | -13.5% | -5.6% | -32.9% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +800.8% | -51.2% | -11.7% | -28.1% | +4.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.2% | -58.1% | +10.4% | +203.0% | +106.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | -60.1% | +31.7% | -47.4% | +286.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -77.7% | +31.7% | -47.4% | +348.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | -25.2% | +3.4% | +44.7% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLGL and HLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGL is the less volatile stock with a -0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DERM's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLN currently trades 81.5% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.18x | 1.18x | 0.06x | 1.82x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.97 | $28.44 | $11.42 | $9.55 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $9.23 | $8.71 | $4.31 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +41.2% | +81.5% | +52.3% | +75.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 60.9 | 36.0 | 44.3 | 16.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 3.4M | 8.0M | 230K | 757K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRGO and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLGL as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", HLN as "Buy", DERM as "Buy", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.0% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs -28.1% for SLGL (target: $50). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.81% vs MCK's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $20.00 | $10.20 | $11.75 | $1006.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +9.8% | +1.9% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 | 2 | — | 17 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | $0.13 | — | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% | 0.0% | +3.4% |
HLN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SLGL vs PRGO vs HLN vs DERM vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) is the stronger pick with 68. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Haleon plc (HLN) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK?
On trailing P/E, Haleon plc (HLN) is the cheapest at 19.
0x versus McKesson Corporation at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McKesson Corporation wins at 0. 49x versus Haleon plc's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +286.
9%, compared to -60. 1% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +348. 1% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 18β versus Journey Medical Corporation's 1. 82β — meaning DERM is approximately -1135% more volatile than SLGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) is pulling ahead at 68. 0% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McKesson Corporation grew EPS 14. 9% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLGL leads at 70. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK?
Haleon plc (HLN) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
1% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLN leads at 22. 4% versus -39. 2% for SLGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLGL leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Haleon plc's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 69. 0x for Journey Medical Corporation — 63. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 135. 0% to $11. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), HLN (1. 9% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SLGL, DERM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLGL or PRGO or HLN or DERM or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Haleon plc (HLN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 1. 9% yield). Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLN: +31. 7%, DERM: -47. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLGL and PRGO and HLN and DERM and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HLN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PRGO, HLN pay a dividend while SLGL, DERM, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.