Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLNG vs SOC vs GTLS vs CIVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Industrial - Machinery
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
SLNG vs SOC vs GTLS vs CIVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Drilling | Industrial - Machinery | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $77M | $1.84T | $9.93B | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $1M | $4.26B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-498M | $40M | $638M |
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | -8.7% | 32.6% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | -367.6% | 8.5% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | 16.4x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $0.00 | $3.74B | $4.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $98M | $366M | $76M |
SLNG vs SOC vs GTLS vs CIVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG) | 100 | 50.1 | -49.9% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 129.1 | +29.1% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLNG vs SOC vs GTLS vs CIVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLNG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.7%
GTLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.56, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.56 vs SOC's 1.51
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs SLNG's -6.9%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 16.4x)
- 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs SLNG's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.6% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 10.8% vs -44.6% |
SLNG vs SOC vs GTLS vs CIVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLNG vs SOC vs GTLS vs CIVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CIVI leads in 3 of 6 categories
GTLS leads 1 • SLNG leads 0 • SOC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 3702.4x SOC's $1M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, GTLS holds the edge at -2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $1M | $4.3B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$454M | $644M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$498M | $40M | $638M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | -$611M | $203M | $934M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | -8.7% | +32.6% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -367.6% | +8.5% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | -391.5% | +0.9% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | -480.4% | +4.8% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.1% | — | -2.5% | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -155.8% | -5.4% | -36.1% | -33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 99% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLNG's 16.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $77M | $1.84T | $9.9B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $79M | $1.84T | $13.3B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -57.14x | -3.07x | 628.45x | 3.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x | 16.40x | 6.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.31x | — | 14.33x | 1.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | — | 2.33x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 2359.43x | 2.79x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 167.45x | — | 48.95x | 2.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. SLNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTLS scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.9% | -113.8% | +1.2% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | -28.9% | +0.4% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | -44.6% | +7.4% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | -37.5% | +8.6% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | — | 1.11x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$98M | $3.4B | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $98M | $366M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $0 | $3.7B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.44x | -2.28x | 1.08x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOC five years ago would be worth $13,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,136 for SLNG. Over the past 12 months, GTLS leads with a +37.6% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.6% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.2% | +9.5% | +0.6% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.6% | -36.8% | +37.6% | +6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.4% | +26.5% | +62.7% | -41.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.6% | +32.6% | +29.5% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.5% | +32.4% | +772.5% | -86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.3% | +8.2% | +17.6% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLNG and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.44x | 1.51x | 0.56x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.36 | $35.00 | $208.51 | $37.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.21 | $3.72 | $140.50 | $25.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.4% | +36.7% | +99.5% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 45.8 | 51.2 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 5.4M | 1.6M | 22.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GTLS and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLNG as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $193.81 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 | 37 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +18.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.60 | $4.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% |
CIVI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GTLS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SLNG vs SOC vs GTLS vs CIVI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI?
Over the past 5 years, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) delivered a total return of +32. 6%, compared to -48. 6% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
(SLNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -445% more volatile than SLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Chart Industries, Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), GTLS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SLNG, SOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLNG or SOC or GTLS or CIVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
(SLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLNG: -80. 5%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLNG and SOC and GTLS and CIVI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLNG (Energy) and SOC (Energy) and GTLS (Industrials) and CIVI (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SLNG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock. CIVI pays a dividend while SLNG, SOC, GTLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.