Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLSR vs TGB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
SLSR vs TGB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Copper |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $2.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $673M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $-30M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $747M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $188M |
SLSR vs TGB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Resources I… (SLSR) | 100 | 467.1 | +367.1% |
| Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) | 100 | 755.2 | +655.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLSR vs TGB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLSR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.01
- EPS growth -62.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.50x
TGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 12.7% 10Y total return vs SLSR's 362.8%
- 10.7% revenue growth vs SLSR's 4.6%
- -4.5% margin vs SLSR's -6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% revenue growth vs SLSR's 4.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.5% margin vs SLSR's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs TGB's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +275.6% vs SLSR's +133.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.3% ROA vs SLSR's -99.7%, ROIC 8.4% vs -444.5% |
SLSR vs TGB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGB and SLSR operate at a comparable scale, with $673M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $673M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | -$30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +26.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +45.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | +117.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TGB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.47x | -106.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGB leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGB delivers a -5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SLSR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGB scores 4/9 vs SLSR's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -99.7% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -145.1% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $559M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $188M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $747M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.10x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGB five years ago would be worth $30,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,745 for SLSR. Over the past 12 months, TGB leads with a +275.6% total return vs SLSR's +133.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGB at 68.3% vs SLSR's 26.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.7% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +133.0% | +275.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.0% | +377.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +203.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +362.8% | +1267.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +68.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SLSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLSR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGB's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLSR currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs TGB's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $9.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.69 | $1.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 106K | 4.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SLSR as "Buy" and TGB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for SLSR (target: $16) vs -48.3% for TGB (target: $4).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $3.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TGB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SLSR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
SLSR vs TGB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLSR or TGB a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Solaris Resources Inc.
(SLSR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLSR or TGB?
Over the past 5 years, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) delivered a total return of +203.
3%, compared to +7. 5% for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1268% versus SLSR's +362. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLSR or TGB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solaris Resources Inc.
(SLSR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 1. 80β — meaning TGB is approximately 79% more volatile than SLSR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SLSR or TGB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Solaris Resources Inc.
grew EPS -62. 1% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLSR or TGB?
Solaris Resources Inc.
(SLSR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGB leads at 20. 5% versus 0. 0% for SLSR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGB leads at 26. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SLSR or TGB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLSR: 58.
6% to $16. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLSR or TGB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SLSR or TGB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Solaris Resources Inc.
(SLSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +362. 8% 10Y return). Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLSR: +362. 8%, TGB: +1268%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLSR and TGB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare TGB vs FCX
FCX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to TGB.
Compare SLSR vs SCCO
SCCO overlaps with SLSR in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With FCX + SCCO
FCX and SCCO are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.