Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SMBK vs CADE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SMBK vs CADE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $777M | $7.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $316M | $2.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $530M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 23.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $1.73B |
SMBK vs CADE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) | 100 | 281.0 | +181.0% |
| Cadence Bank (CADE) | 100 | 185.2 | +85.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMBK vs CADE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMBK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 198.2% 10Y total return vs CADE's 123.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 18.4%, current ratio 0.22x
- PEG 0.96 vs CADE's 3.20
CADE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.35, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -5.1%
- NIM 3.1% vs SMBK's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs SMBK's 10.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.96 vs 3.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SMBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs CADE's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs SMBK's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs CADE's +38.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SMBK's 0.4% |
SMBK vs CADE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CADE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 9.0x SMBK's $316M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.7% (CADE) to 15.9% (SMBK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $316M | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $722M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $530M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $508M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +23.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +18.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +17.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | -6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, CADE trades at a 0% valuation discount to SMBK's 15.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMBK offers better value at 1.18x vs CADE's 4.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $777M | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $414M | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.26x | 15.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.50x | 12.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | 4.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 7.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 2.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.10x | 10.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CADE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMBK delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for CADE. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMBK's 0.18x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$363M | -$1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,845 for CADE. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs CADE's +38.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 29.7% vs SMBK's 26.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | -1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.8% | +38.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +118.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +58.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +123.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +29.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SMBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CADE's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.63 | $46.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.95 | $29.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 80.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CADE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMBK as "Hold" and CADE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for SMBK (target: $49) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, CADE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.34% vs SMBK's 0.71%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $39.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
SMBK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CADE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).
SMBK vs CADE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMBK or CADE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK). Cadence Bank (CADE) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMBK or CADE?
On trailing P/E, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus SmartFinancial, Inc. at 15. 3x. On forward P/E, Cadence Bank is actually cheaper at 12. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SmartFinancial, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus Cadence Bank's 3. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or CADE?
Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to +58. 4% for Cadence Bank (CADE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBK returned +198. 2% versus CADE's +123. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMBK or CADE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 35β — meaning CADE is approximately 75% more volatile than SMBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 18% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMBK or CADE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.
4% versus 10. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Cadence Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMBK or CADE?
Cadence Bank (CADE) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
0% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CADE leads at 23. 3% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMBK leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMBK or CADE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus Cadence Bank's 3. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cadence Bank (CADE) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for SmartFinancial, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMBK: 7. 8% to $49. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or CADE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cadence Bank (CADE) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).
09Is SMBK or CADE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 0. 7% yield, +198. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMBK: +198. 2%, CADE: +123. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMBK and CADE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.