Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMC vs HESM vs TRGP vs DKL vs MPLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
SMC vs HESM vs TRGP vs DKL vs MPLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $372M | $8.05B | $54.26B | $2.71B | $57.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $562M | $1.62B | $16.38B | $1.06B | $12.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $353M | $2.13B | $170M | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 72.6% | 75.0% | 22.1% | 19.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 62.2% | 21.1% | 16.5% | 44.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.3x | 24.9x | 13.8x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.05B | $3.77B | $17.55B | $35M | $26.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $2M | $166M | $11M | $2.14B |
SMC vs HESM vs TRGP vs DKL vs MPLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Midstream Co… (SMC) | 100 | 79.8 | -20.2% |
| Hess Midstream LP (HESM) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 186.6 | +86.6% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 123.8 | +23.8% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMC vs HESM vs TRGP vs DKL vs MPLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.8%, EPS growth 87.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 30.8% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1%
HESM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 7.4%
TRGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs SMC's 279.2%
- +61.6% vs SMC's +10.0%
DKL is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HESM's 7.4%
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, current ratio 1.23x
- Beta 0.18, yield 7.0%, current ratio 1.23x
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 13.8x)
- 37.5% margin vs SMC's 1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.8% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs SMC's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs SMC's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HESM's 7.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs SMC's +10.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs SMC's 0.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 2.7% |
SMC vs HESM vs TRGP vs DKL vs MPLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMC vs HESM vs TRGP vs DKL vs MPLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMC leads in 1 of 6 categories
TRGP leads 1 • HESM leads 0 • DKL leads 0 • MPLX leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SMC and HESM and MPLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 29.1x SMC's $562M. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMC's 1.6%. On growth, SMC holds the edge at +33.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $562M | $1.6B | $16.4B | $1.1B | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $201M | $1.2B | $5.0B | $310M | $7.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $353M | $2.1B | $170M | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $585M | $1.2B | $112M | $5.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.6% | +75.0% | +22.1% | +19.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +62.2% | +21.1% | +16.5% | +44.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +21.8% | +13.0% | +16.0% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +36.1% | +7.1% | +10.6% | +39.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.0% | +2.3% | -15.6% | +19.0% | +5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.5% | +5.9% | -100.0% | -17.8% | -17.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 61% valuation discount to TRGP's 29.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMC's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRGP's 14.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $372M | $8.0B | $54.3B | $2.7B | $57.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $11.8B | $71.6B | $2.7B | $81.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.86x | 13.50x | 29.63x | 15.46x | 11.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.29x | 24.88x | 13.82x | 12.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.80x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.56x | 9.67x | 14.44x | 8.81x | 13.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 4.96x | 3.17x | 2.68x | 4.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 10.85x | 16.97x | 446.88x | 3.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.36x | 11.05x | 92.90x | — | 13.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HESM and DKL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for SMC. SMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HESM's 8.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HESM scores 6/9 vs DKL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +74.9% | +70.8% | +19.2% | +32.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +8.1% | +8.5% | +6.1% | +11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +18.6% | +13.2% | +14.1% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +24.8% | +16.7% | +8.3% | +12.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 8.61x | 5.49x | 5.75x | 1.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $3.8B | $17.4B | $24M | $24.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $2M | $166M | $11M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $3.8B | $17.5B | $35M | $26.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 4.54x | 6.52x | 1.66x | 5.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,224 for SMC. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs SMC's +10.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs SMC's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.4% | +13.6% | +36.4% | +13.4% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.0% | +10.9% | +61.6% | +45.1% | +22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.8% | +62.9% | +268.0% | +45.6% | +95.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.8% | +123.1% | +592.2% | +86.0% | +157.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +279.2% | +121.2% | +618.0% | +207.3% | +184.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.3% | +17.7% | +54.4% | +13.3% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRGP and MPLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMC's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRGP currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs HESM's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.27x | 0.29x | 0.35x | 0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.50 | $44.14 | $261.95 | $55.89 | $59.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.13 | $31.63 | $144.14 | $37.50 | $47.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +87.5% | +96.4% | +91.3% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 49.1 | 54.1 | 50.0 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 1.6M | 1.3M | 64K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HESM and DKL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HESM as "Hold", TRGP as "Buy", DKL as "Hold", MPLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.8% upside for SMC (target: $47) vs -17.1% for HESM (target: $32). For income investors, DKL offers the higher dividend yield at 8.72% vs TRGP's 1.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $32.00 | $237.70 | $56.00 | $60.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 33 | 10 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +7.4% | +1.5% | +8.7% | +7.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.10 | $2.84 | $3.81 | $4.45 | $3.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% | +1.2% | +0.4% | +0.7% |
SMC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TRGP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
SMC vs HESM vs TRGP vs DKL vs MPLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Summit Midstream Corp.
(SMC) is the stronger pick with 30. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Targa Resources Corp. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, MPLX Lp is actually cheaper at 12. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to -17. 8% for Summit Midstream Corp. (SMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +618. 0% versus HESM's +121. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
18β versus Summit Midstream Corp. 's 0. 63β — meaning SMC is approximately 248% more volatile than MPLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit Midstream Corp. (SMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 9% for Hess Midstream LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Summit Midstream Corp.
(SMC) is pulling ahead at 30. 8% versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit Midstream Corp. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 4% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus -3. 5% for Summit Midstream Corp. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HESM leads at 62. 2% versus 12. 9% for SMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMC leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MPLX Lp (MPLX) trades at 12.
7x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Targa Resources Corp. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMC: 54. 8% to $47. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) offers the highest yield at 8. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).
09Is SMC or HESM or TRGP or DKL or MPLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 1. 5% yield, +618. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +618. 0%, SMC: +279. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMC and HESM and TRGP and DKL and MPLX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMC is a small-cap high-growth stock; HESM is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.