Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMC vs WMB vs KMI vs HESM vs TRGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
SMC vs WMB vs KMI vs HESM vs TRGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $365M | $88.01B | $69.88B | $7.95B | $53.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $562M | $11.92B | $17.52B | $1.62B | $16.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $2.84B | $3.31B | $353M | $2.13B |
| Gross Margin | 72.6% | 62.8% | 46.9% | 75.0% | 22.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 38.8% | 28.6% | 62.2% | 21.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.6x | 21.9x | 12.8x | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.05B | $29.36B | $32.39B | $3.77B | $17.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $63M | $109M | $2M | $166M |
SMC vs WMB vs KMI vs HESM vs TRGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Midstream Co… (SMC) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
| The Williams Compan… (WMB) | 100 | 167.6 | +67.6% |
| Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) | 100 | 148.7 | +48.7% |
| Hess Midstream LP (HESM) | 100 | 101.8 | +1.8% |
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMC vs WMB vs KMI vs HESM vs TRGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 30.8%, EPS growth 87.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 30.8% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1%
WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 23.8% margin vs SMC's 1.6%
KMI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 99.8%, current ratio 0.64x
- PEG 0.23 vs HESM's 0.76
- Lower P/E (21.9x vs 24.5x)
HESM is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.22, yield 7.5%, current ratio 0.85x
- 7.5% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs KMI's 3.7%
TRGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs WMB's 365.9%
- +57.7% vs SMC's +5.3%
- 8.5% ROA vs SMC's 0.4%, ROIC 13.2% vs 2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.8% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.9x vs 24.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs SMC's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs SMC's 0.55 | |
| Dividends | 7.5% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs KMI's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.7% vs SMC's +5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs SMC's 0.4%, ROIC 13.2% vs 2.7% |
SMC vs WMB vs KMI vs HESM vs TRGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMC vs WMB vs KMI vs HESM vs TRGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HESM leads in 1 of 6 categories
SMC leads 1 • TRGP leads 1 • WMB leads 0 • KMI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HESM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.5B annually — 31.2x SMC's $562M. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMC's 1.6%. On growth, SMC holds the edge at +33.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $562M | $11.9B | $17.5B | $1.6B | $16.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $201M | $6.8B | $7.5B | $1.2B | $5.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $2.8B | $3.3B | $353M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $722M | $3.9B | $585M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.6% | +62.8% | +46.9% | +75.0% | +22.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +38.8% | +28.6% | +62.2% | +21.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +23.8% | +18.9% | +21.8% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +6.1% | +22.2% | +36.1% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.0% | -0.6% | +13.5% | +2.3% | -15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.5% | +24.6% | +37.5% | +5.9% | +145.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SMC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, HESM trades at a 60% valuation discount to WMB's 33.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KMI offers better value at 0.24x vs HESM's 0.79x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $365M | $88.0B | $69.9B | $8.0B | $53.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $117.3B | $102.2B | $11.7B | $70.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.50x | 33.63x | 22.93x | 13.35x | 29.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.62x | 21.88x | 12.83x | 24.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | 0.24x | 0.79x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.52x | 17.38x | 14.06x | 9.59x | 14.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.65x | 7.36x | 4.12x | 4.91x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 5.86x | 2.15x | 10.73x | 16.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.20x | 87.57x | 21.70x | 10.92x | 91.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SMC and HESM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HESM delivers a 74.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $1 for SMC. SMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HESM's 8.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMI scores 8/9 vs SMC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +19.0% | +10.3% | +74.9% | +70.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +4.9% | +4.5% | +8.1% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +7.7% | +5.6% | +18.6% | +13.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +8.7% | +7.0% | +24.8% | +16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 1.96x | 1.00x | 8.61x | 5.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $29.3B | $32.3B | $3.8B | $17.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $63M | $109M | $2M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $29.4B | $32.4B | $3.8B | $17.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 3.37x | 2.86x | 4.54x | 6.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $68,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,064 for SMC. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +57.7% total return vs SMC's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 53.5% vs SMC's -6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.2% | +19.1% | +15.5% | +14.6% | +34.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | +29.7% | +20.5% | +13.1% | +57.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.4% | +162.9% | +106.4% | +64.1% | +261.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.4% | +217.6% | +103.2% | +127.7% | +590.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +277.7% | +365.9% | +141.5% | +122.5% | +606.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.9% | +38.0% | +27.3% | +18.0% | +53.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KMI and TRGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KMI is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMC's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRGP currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs HESM's 86.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.13x | 0.07x | 0.22x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.50 | $77.41 | $34.73 | $44.14 | $261.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.13 | $55.82 | $25.60 | $31.63 | $144.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +93.0% | +90.5% | +86.5% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 49.2 | 41.8 | 51.6 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 5.8M | 12.3M | 1.6M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KMI and HESM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMB as "Buy", KMI as "Hold", HESM as "Hold", TRGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for SMC (target: $47) vs -16.2% for HESM (target: $32). For income investors, HESM offers the higher dividend yield at 7.45% vs TRGP's 1.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $79.44 | $35.00 | $32.00 | $246.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 34 | 9 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +2.8% | +3.7% | +7.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.10 | $2.00 | $1.17 | $2.84 | $3.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.0% | +1.2% |
HESM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SMC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SMC vs WMB vs KMI vs HESM vs TRGP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Summit Midstream Corp.
(SMC) is the stronger pick with 30. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Hess Midstream LP (HESM) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP?
On trailing P/E, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the cheapest at 13.
3x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 33. 6x. On forward P/E, Hess Midstream LP is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kinder Morgan, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Hess Midstream LP's 0. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +590. 0%, compared to -19. 4% for Summit Midstream Corp. (SMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +606. 8% versus HESM's +122. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kinder Morgan, Inc.
(KMI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Summit Midstream Corp. 's 0. 55β — meaning SMC is approximately 693% more volatile than KMI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit Midstream Corp. (SMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 9% for Hess Midstream LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Summit Midstream Corp.
(SMC) is pulling ahead at 30. 8% versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit Midstream Corp. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for Hess Midstream LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP?
The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus -3. 5% for Summit Midstream Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HESM leads at 62. 2% versus 12. 9% for SMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMC leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Hess Midstream LP's 0. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 30. 6x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMC: 57. 8% to $47. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) offers the highest yield at 7. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).
09Is SMC or WMB or KMI or HESM or TRGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 1. 5% yield, +606. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +606. 8%, SMC: +277. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMC and WMB and KMI and HESM and TRGP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KMI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HESM is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.