Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SMTC vs MPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
SMTC vs MPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $11.21B | $77.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.03B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $616M |
| Gross Margin | 52.0% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 26.1% |
| Forward P/E | 71.7x | 73.1x |
| Total Debt | $552M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $1.10B |
SMTC vs MPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 228.5 | +128.5% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMTC vs MPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMTC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (71.7x vs 73.1x)
- +253.5% vs MPWR's +148.6%
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs SMTC's 460.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs SMTC's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (71.7x vs 73.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs SMTC's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.28 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.5% vs MPWR's +148.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SMTC's 2.0%, ROIC 22.2% vs 4.9% |
SMTC vs MPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMTC vs MPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 2.7x SMTC's $1.0B. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMTC's 2.8%. On growth, MPWR holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $173M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $616M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $143M | $664M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.0% | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +26.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +20.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.4% | -88.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SMTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MPWR's 97.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMTC's 104.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.2B | $77.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.6B | $76.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -53.76x | 123.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 71.68x | 73.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 104.59x | 97.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.33x | 27.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.04x | 21.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 256.13x | 116.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for SMTC. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +20.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $400M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $552M | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.45x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SMTC and MPWR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,981 for SMTC. Over the past 12 months, SMTC leads with a +253.5% total return vs MPWR's +148.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMTC at 86.4% vs MPWR's 56.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +61.4% | +68.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +253.5% | +148.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +547.3% | +280.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.8% | +366.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +460.9% | +2494.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +86.4% | +56.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMTC and MPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPWR is the less volatile stock with a 2.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127.19 | $1662.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.06 | $613.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 71.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 577K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMTC as "Buy" and MPWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -28.0% for SMTC (target: $87). MPWR is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.44 | $1615.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SMTC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SMTC vs MPWR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMTC or MPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) offers the better valuation at 123. 6x trailing P/E (73. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Semtech Corporation (SMTC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMTC or MPWR?
On forward P/E, Semtech Corporation is actually cheaper at 71.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMTC or MPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to +89. 8% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus SMTC's +460. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMTC or MPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 28β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 73β — meaning SMTC is approximately 20% more volatile than MPWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMTC or MPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semtech Corporation grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMTC or MPWR?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -17. 8% for Semtech Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus 6. 8% for SMTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMTC or MPWR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Semtech Corporation (SMTC) trades at 71.
7x forward P/E versus 73. 1x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 2. 5% to $1615. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMTC or MPWR?
In this comparison, MPWR (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SMTC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMTC or MPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Semtech Corporation (SMTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+460.
9% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMTC: +460. 9%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMTC and MPWR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.