Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMTK vs FLEX vs AMAT vs JBL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
SMTK vs FLEX vs AMAT vs JBL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $2M | $48.92B | $325.54B | $37.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $178K | $26.84B | $28.37B | $32.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $852M | $7.00B | $809M |
| Gross Margin | -62.4% | 9.1% | 48.7% | 9.0% |
| Operating Margin | -58.2% | 4.9% | 29.2% | 4.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.0x | 37.1x | 28.4x |
| Total Debt | $72K | $4.15B | $6.55B | $3.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $2.29B | $7.24B | $1.93B |
SMTK vs FLEX vs AMAT vs JBL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Flex Ltd. (FLEX) | 100 | 806.8 | +706.8% |
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 100 | 305.9 | +205.9% |
| Jabil Inc. (JBL) | 100 | 604.8 | +504.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMTK vs FLEX vs AMAT vs JBL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMTK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 203.7%, EPS growth 49.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 65.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.72x
- 203.7% revenue growth vs FLEX's -2.3%
FLEX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +250.6% vs SMTK's -85.0%
AMAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.14, yield 0.4%
- 20.1% 10Y total return vs JBL's 19.6%
- Beta 2.14, yield 0.4%, current ratio 2.61x
- 24.7% margin vs SMTK's -62.6%
JBL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.37 vs AMAT's 2.16
- Lower P/E (28.4x vs 37.1x), PEG 0.37 vs 2.16
- Beta 1.76 vs AMAT's 2.14
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 203.7% revenue growth vs FLEX's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.4x vs 37.1x), PEG 0.37 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.7% margin vs SMTK's -62.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.76 vs AMAT's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JBL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +250.6% vs SMTK's -85.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs SMTK's -343.2% |
SMTK vs FLEX vs AMAT vs JBL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMTK vs FLEX vs AMAT vs JBL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
JBL leads 1 • FLEX leads 1 • SMTK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBL is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.7B annually — 183522.5x SMTK's $178,000. AMAT is the more profitable business, keeping 24.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMTK's -62.6%. On growth, JBL holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $178,000 | $26.8B | $28.4B | $32.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $1.7B | $8.4B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $852M | $7.0B | $809M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $1.2B | $5.7B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -62.4% | +9.1% | +48.7% | +9.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.2% | +4.9% | +29.2% | +4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -62.6% | +3.2% | +24.7% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | +4.3% | +20.1% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.7% | -3.5% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.7% | -4.5% | +13.9% | +96.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JBL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 47.4x trailing earnings, AMAT trades at a 25% valuation discount to FLEX's 63.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JBL offers better value at 0.78x vs AMAT's 2.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $48.9B | $325.5B | $37.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$5M | $50.8B | $324.9B | $39.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.10x | 63.05x | 47.40x | 59.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.98x | 37.07x | 28.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.96x | 2.76x | 0.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.73x | 38.68x | 21.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.49x | 1.90x | 11.48x | 1.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 10.59x | 16.25x | 25.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.85x | 57.13x | 32.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBL delivers a 58.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-141 for SMTK. SMTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBL's 2.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMAT scores 7/9 vs SMTK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -140.5% | +16.8% | +34.3% | +58.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | +4.4% | +19.3% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +13.0% | +33.3% | +30.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -129.8% | +12.8% | +30.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.83x | 0.32x | 2.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $1.9B | -$686M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $2.3B | $7.2B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72,000 | $4.1B | $6.6B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13274.00x | 6.38x | 35.46x | 4.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLEX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLEX five years ago would be worth $71,185 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for SMTK. Over the past 12 months, FLEX leads with a +250.6% total return vs SMTK's -85.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLEX at 85.5% vs SMTK's -60.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -72.4% | +108.9% | +52.9% | +45.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.0% | +250.6% | +164.7% | +129.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | +538.7% | +258.7% | +347.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +611.9% | +213.8% | +540.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +998.6% | +2014.4% | +1957.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.3% | +85.5% | +53.1% | +64.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLEX and JBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBL is the less volatile stock with a 1.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMAT's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLEX currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs SMTK's 8.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 2.03x | 2.14x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.80 | $139.39 | $432.81 | $372.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $34.94 | $151.51 | $148.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.7% | +95.4% | +94.8% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 90.9 | 66.3 | 78.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 682K | 3.8M | 6.0M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
AMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLEX as "Buy", AMAT as "Buy", JBL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.9% upside for AMAT (target: $426) vs -39.9% for FLEX (target: $80). AMAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $80.00 | $426.39 | $273.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 53 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.71 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% | +1.5% | +2.7% |
AMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JBL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SMTK vs FLEX vs AMAT vs JBL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SmartKem, Inc.
(SMTK) is the stronger pick with 203. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for Flex Ltd. (FLEX). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) offers the better valuation at 47. 4x trailing P/E (37. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flex Ltd. (FLEX) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL?
On trailing P/E, Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) is the cheapest at 47. 4x versus Flex Ltd. at 63. 1x. On forward P/E, Jabil Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Jabil Inc. wins at 0. 37x versus Applied Materials, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL?
Over the past 5 years, Flex Ltd.
(FLEX) delivered a total return of +611. 9%, compared to -99. 6% for SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMAT returned +20. 1% versus SMTK's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jabil Inc.
(JBL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 76β versus Applied Materials, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning AMAT is approximately 22% more volatile than JBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Jabil Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartKem, Inc.
(SMTK) is pulling ahead at 203. 7% versus -2. 3% for Flex Ltd. (FLEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartKem, Inc. grew EPS 49. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Jabil Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTK leads at 65. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL?
Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -126. 0% for SmartKem, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMAT leads at 29. 2% versus -127. 6% for SMTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMTK leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Jabil Inc. (JBL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus Applied Materials, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Jabil Inc. (JBL) trades at 28. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 0x for Flex Ltd. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMAT: 3. 9% to $426. 39.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL?
In this comparison, AMAT (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SMTK, FLEX, JBL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMTK or FLEX or AMAT or JBL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jabil Inc.
(JBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1957% 10Y return). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBL: +1957%, AMAT: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMTK and FLEX and AMAT and JBL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLEX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JBL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.