Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $377M | $2.43B | $3.18T | $12.85B | $4.50T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $289M | $564M | $318.27B | $1.42B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-30M | $64M | $125.22B | $160M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 44.3% | 68.3% | 64.0% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 13.7% | 46.8% | 8.2% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 25.9x | 27.9x | 25.5x | 43.0x | 26.3x |
| Total Debt | $43M | $64M | $112.18B | $716M | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $164M | $30.24B | $699M | $30.71B |
SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB) | 100 | 20.3 | -79.7% |
| Sapiens Internation… (SPNS) | 100 | 150.7 | +50.7% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 154.7 | +54.7% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 316.0 | +216.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SMWB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SPNS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.3%, current ratio 2.24x
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MSFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (25.5x vs 43.0x)
- 39.3% margin vs SMWB's -10.4%
GWRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 22.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4%
- Beta 0.46 vs SMWB's 1.79, lower leverage
GOOGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 9.2% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.7%
- PEG 0.88 vs SPNS's 1.40
- +122.1% vs SMWB's -42.7%
- 27.4% ROA vs SMWB's -11.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.5x vs 43.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs SMWB's -10.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs SMWB's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +122.1% vs SMWB's -42.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs SMWB's -11.9% |
SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
SMWB leads 1 • SPNS leads 0 • MSFT leads 0 • GWRE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MSFT and GWRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 1460.2x SMWB's $289M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMWB's -10.4%. On growth, GWRE holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $289M | $564M | $318.3B | $1.4B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $93M | $192.6B | $123M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$30M | $64M | $125.2B | $160M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $72M | $72.9B | $337M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +44.3% | +68.3% | +64.0% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +13.7% | +46.8% | +8.2% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +11.4% | +39.3% | +11.2% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +12.8% | +22.9% | +23.7% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +11.2% | +18.3% | +26.9% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.7% | -24.2% | +23.4% | -63.0% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SMWB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.4x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 83% valuation discount to GWRE's 186.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.15x vs SPNS's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $377M | $2.4B | $3.18T | $12.9B | $4.50T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $347M | $2.3B | $3.26T | $12.9B | $4.53T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.10x | 33.68x | 31.38x | 186.63x | 34.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.87x | 27.85x | 25.49x | 42.99x | 26.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 1.67x | — | 1.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.11x | 20.05x | 198.52x | 30.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 4.48x | 11.29x | 10.69x | 11.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.74x | 5.09x | 9.30x | 8.91x | 10.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.63x | 33.63x | 44.40x | 43.55x | 61.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SMWB. SPNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMWB's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPNS scores 8/9 vs SMWB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -129.6% | +12.9% | +33.1% | +11.0% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.9% | +8.9% | +19.2% | +6.0% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +17.4% | +24.9% | +2.3% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.2% | +16.9% | +29.7% | +2.3% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.86x | 0.13x | 0.33x | 0.49x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | -$100M | $81.9B | $17M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $164M | $30.2B | $699M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43M | $64M | $112.2B | $716M | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.88x | 228.41x | 55.65x | 16.65x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $31,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,987 for SMWB. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +122.1% total return vs SMWB's -42.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 43.7% vs SMWB's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.1% | — | -9.1% | -19.4% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.7% | +48.9% | -7.0% | -40.5% | +122.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +77.5% | +30.3% | +109.5% | +196.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.1% | +66.0% | +76.6% | +45.0% | +212.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | +287.9% | +767.3% | +143.5% | +924.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | +21.1% | +9.2% | +28.0% | +43.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPNS and GWRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMWB's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPNS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SMWB's 40.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.51x | 0.83x | 0.46x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.75 | $43.52 | $555.45 | $272.60 | $408.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $26.14 | $356.28 | $115.57 | $162.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.3% | +99.8% | +77.1% | +55.5% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 69.6 | 52.7 | 57.5 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 674K | 0 | 33.6M | 1.2M | 28.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SPNS and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMWB as "Buy", SPNS as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy", GWRE as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.4% upside for GWRE (target: $241) vs -12.5% for SPNS (target: $38). For income investors, SPNS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs GOOGL's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.38 | $38.00 | $551.96 | $241.00 | $410.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 10 | 81 | 26 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +0.8% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 16 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.57 | $3.23 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SMWB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the stronger pick with 22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 31. 4x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 31.
4x versus Guidewire Software, Inc. at 186. 6x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 88x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +212. 5%, compared to -80. 1% for Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +924. 6% versus SMWB's -80. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Similarweb Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning SMWB is approximately 287% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 186% for Similarweb Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is pulling ahead at 22. 6% versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to -178. 6% for Similarweb Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GWRE leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -11. 7% for Similarweb Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -8. 3% for SMWB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMWB leads at 79. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 88x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 5x forward P/E versus 43. 0x for Guidewire Software, Inc. — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 59. 4% to $241. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?
In this comparison, SPNS (1.
3% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SMWB, GWRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 0. 8% yield, +767. 3% 10Y return). Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +767. 3%, SMWB: -80. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMWB and SPNS and MSFT and GWRE and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMWB (Communication Services) and SPNS (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and GWRE (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMWB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. SPNS, MSFT pay a dividend while SMWB, GWRE, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 47%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.