Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMWB
Similarweb Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • IL
Market Cap$377M
5Y Perf.-79.7%
SPNS
Sapiens International Corporation N.V.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$2.43B
5Y Perf.+50.7%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.18T
5Y Perf.+71.4%
GWRE
Guidewire Software, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.85B
5Y Perf.+54.7%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50T
5Y Perf.+216.0%

SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMWB logoSMWB
SPNS logoSPNS
MSFT logoMSFT
GWRE logoGWRE
GOOGL logoGOOGL
IndustryInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$377M$2.43B$3.18T$12.85B$4.50T
Revenue (TTM)$289M$564M$318.27B$1.42B$422.57B
Net Income (TTM)$-30M$64M$125.22B$160M$160.21B
Gross Margin79.4%44.3%68.3%64.0%60.4%
Operating Margin-6.1%13.7%46.8%8.2%32.7%
Forward P/E25.9x27.9x25.5x43.0x26.3x
Total Debt$43M$64M$112.18B$716M$59.29B
Cash & Equiv.$72M$164M$30.24B$699M$30.71B

SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMWB
SPNS
MSFT
GWRE
GOOGL
StockMay 21Jun 26Return
Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB)10020.3-79.7%
Sapiens Internation… (SPNS)100150.7+50.7%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)100171.4+71.4%
Guidewire Software,… (GWRE)100154.7+54.7%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100316.0+216.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSFT and GWRE are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Guidewire Software, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. GOOGL and SPNS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SMWB
Similarweb Ltd.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SMWB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
SPNS
Sapiens International Corporation N.V.
The Income Pick

SPNS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 2.24x
  • Beta 0.51, yield 1.3%, current ratio 2.24x
  • 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Value Play

MSFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (25.5x vs 43.0x)
  • 39.3% margin vs SMWB's -10.4%
Best for: value and quality
GWRE
Guidewire Software, Inc.
The Growth Play

GWRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
  • 22.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4%
  • Beta 0.46 vs SMWB's 1.79, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GOOGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 9.2% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.7%
  • PEG 0.88 vs SPNS's 1.40
  • +122.1% vs SMWB's -42.7%
  • 27.4% ROA vs SMWB's -11.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGWRE logoGWRE22.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4%
ValueMSFT logoMSFTLower P/E (25.5x vs 43.0x)
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs SMWB's -10.4%
Stability / SafetyGWRE logoGWREBeta 0.46 vs SMWB's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsSPNS logoSPNS1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+122.1% vs SMWB's -42.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs SMWB's -11.9%

SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMWBSimilarweb Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SPNSSapiens International Corporation N.V.
FY 2023
Insurance Member
95.7%$493M
All Other Member
4.3%$22M
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B
GWREGuidewire Software, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription
55.5%$667M
Term License
20.9%$252M
Service
18.2%$219M
Support
5.3%$64M
Perpetual License
0.0%$118,000
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000

SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGOOGLLAGGINGGWRE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MSFT and GWRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 1460.2x SMWB's $289M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMWB's -10.4%. On growth, GWRE holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSMWB logoSMWBSimilarweb Ltd.SPNS logoSPNSSapiens Internati…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$289M$564M$318.3B$1.4B$422.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$9M$93M$192.6B$123M$161.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$30M$64M$125.2B$160M$160.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$72M$72.9B$337M$73.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+79.4%+44.3%+68.3%+64.0%+60.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.1%+13.7%+46.8%+8.2%+32.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.4%+11.4%+39.3%+11.2%+37.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.0%+12.8%+22.9%+23.7%+17.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.1%+11.2%+18.3%+26.9%+21.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.7%-24.2%+23.4%-63.0%+81.9%
Evenly matched — MSFT and GWRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SMWB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 31.4x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 83% valuation discount to GWRE's 186.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.15x vs SPNS's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSMWB logoSMWBSimilarweb Ltd.SPNS logoSPNSSapiens Internati…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Market CapShares × price$377M$2.4B$3.18T$12.9B$4.50T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$347M$2.3B$3.26T$12.9B$4.53T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-11.10x33.68x31.38x186.63x34.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.87x27.85x25.49x42.99x26.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.69x1.67x1.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.11x20.05x198.52x30.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.33x4.48x11.29x10.69x11.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share15.74x5.09x9.30x8.91x10.97x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.63x33.63x44.40x43.55x61.48x
SMWB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SMWB. SPNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMWB's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPNS scores 8/9 vs SMWB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSMWB logoSMWBSimilarweb Ltd.SPNS logoSPNSSapiens Internati…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-129.6%+12.9%+33.1%+11.0%+39.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.9%+8.9%+19.2%+6.0%+27.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.4%+24.9%+2.3%+25.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-36.2%+16.9%+29.7%+2.3%+30.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948677
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.86x0.13x0.33x0.49x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$29M-$100M$81.9B$17M$28.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$72M$164M$30.2B$699M$30.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$43M$64M$112.2B$716M$59.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.88x228.41x55.65x16.65x392.15x
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $31,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,987 for SMWB. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +122.1% total return vs SMWB's -42.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 43.7% vs SMWB's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMWB logoSMWBSimilarweb Ltd.SPNS logoSPNSSapiens Internati…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-39.1%-9.1%-19.4%+18.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.7%+48.9%-7.0%-40.5%+122.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.3%+77.5%+30.3%+109.5%+196.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.1%+66.0%+76.6%+45.0%+212.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.2%+287.9%+767.3%+143.5%+924.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-13.5%+21.1%+9.2%+28.0%+43.7%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SPNS and GWRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMWB's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPNS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SMWB's 40.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMWB logoSMWBSimilarweb Ltd.SPNS logoSPNSSapiens Internati…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x0.51x0.83x0.46x1.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.75$43.52$555.45$272.60$408.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.22$26.14$356.28$115.57$162.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.3%+99.8%+77.1%+55.5%+91.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.169.652.757.538.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded674K033.6M1.2M28.0M
Evenly matched — SPNS and GWRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SPNS and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SMWB as "Buy", SPNS as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy", GWRE as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.4% upside for GWRE (target: $241) vs -12.5% for SPNS (target: $38). For income investors, SPNS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs GOOGL's 0.22%.

MetricSMWB logoSMWBSimilarweb Ltd.SPNS logoSPNSSapiens Internati…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.38$38.00$551.96$241.00$410.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts1210812682
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+0.8%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2162
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.57$3.23$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.6%0.0%+1.0%
Evenly matched — SPNS and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SMWB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOGL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMWB vs SPNS vs MSFT vs GWRE vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.

(GWRE) is the stronger pick with 22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 31. 4x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?

On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 31.

4x versus Guidewire Software, Inc. at 186. 6x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 88x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +212. 5%, compared to -80. 1% for Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +924. 6% versus SMWB's -80. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.

(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Similarweb Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning SMWB is approximately 287% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 186% for Similarweb Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guidewire Software, Inc.

(GWRE) is pulling ahead at 22. 6% versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to -178. 6% for Similarweb Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GWRE leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus -11. 7% for Similarweb Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -8. 3% for SMWB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMWB leads at 79. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 88x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 5x forward P/E versus 43. 0x for Guidewire Software, Inc. — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 59. 4% to $241. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL?

In this comparison, SPNS (1.

3% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SMWB, GWRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SMWB or SPNS or MSFT or GWRE or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 0. 8% yield, +767. 3% 10Y return). Similarweb Ltd. (SMWB) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +767. 3%, SMWB: -80. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMWB and SPNS and MSFT and GWRE and GOOGL?

These companies operate in different sectors (SMWB (Communication Services) and SPNS (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and GWRE (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SMWB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. SPNS, MSFT pay a dividend while SMWB, GWRE, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SMWB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPNS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GWRE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SMWB and SPNS and MSFT and GWRE and GOOGL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SMWB: 10.1% · SPNS: 11.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.