Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMXT vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMXT
Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-87.8%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-38.9%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.24B
5Y Perf.+14.6%
SPWR
SunPower Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$866M
5Y Perf.-3.8%

SMXT vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMXT logoSMXT
SHLS logoSHLS
RUN logoRUN
SPWR logoSPWR
IndustrySolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$32M$1.32B$3.24B$866M
Revenue (TTM)$51M$536M$3.17B$315M
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$34M$568M$-42M
Gross Margin7.7%33.5%23.5%50.4%
Operating Margin-13.1%11.2%-1.8%-2.7%
Forward P/E19.4x22.8x5.1x
Total Debt$35M$175M$14.89B$188M
Cash & Equiv.$786K$7M$1.24B$10M

SMXT vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMXT
SHLS
RUN
SPWR
StockFeb 24May 26Return
Solarmax Technology… (SMXT)10012.2-87.8%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10061.1-38.9%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)100114.6+14.6%
SunPower Inc. (SPWR)10096.2-3.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMXT vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RUN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. SHLS and SPWR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SMXT
Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock
The Defensive Choice

SMXT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.

  • Beta 1.11 vs RUN's 2.89
Best for: stability
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.08, Low D/E 29.2%, current ratio 2.03x
  • Beta 2.08, current ratio 2.03x
  • 3.7% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 5.9% vs -5.3%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Growth Play

RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • 86.7% 10Y total return vs SHLS's -74.7%
  • 45.1% revenue growth vs SMXT's -57.5%
  • 17.9% margin vs SMXT's -18.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
The Value Play

SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (5.1x vs 22.8x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUN logoRUN45.1% revenue growth vs SMXT's -57.5%
ValueSPWR logoSPWRLower P/E (5.1x vs 22.8x)
Quality / MarginsRUN logoRUN17.9% margin vs SMXT's -18.4%
Stability / SafetySMXT logoSMXTBeta 1.11 vs RUN's 2.89
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RUN logoRUN+86.7% vs SMXT's -49.5%
Efficiency (ROA)SHLS logoSHLS3.7% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 5.9% vs -5.3%

SMXT vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMXTSolarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M
SPWRSunPower Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$109M

SMXT vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSHLSLAGGINGSPWR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SMXT and RUN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

RUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 62.4x SMXT's $51M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMXT's -18.4%. On growth, SMXT holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSMXT logoSMXTSolarmax Technolo…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$51M$536M$3.2B$315M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$73M$541M-$6M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$34M$568M-$42M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M-$77M-$326M-$15M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+7.7%+33.5%+23.5%+50.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.1%+11.2%-1.8%-2.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-18.4%+6.3%+17.9%-13.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.4%-14.5%-10.3%-4.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%+74.9%+43.2%-0.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+76.5%+2.1%-101.3%
Evenly matched — SMXT and RUN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — RUN and SPWR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 79% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHLS's 22.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.

MetricSMXT logoSMXTSolarmax Technolo…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.
Market CapShares × price$32M$1.3B$3.2B$866M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$66M$1.5B$16.9B$1.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.77x39.20x8.07x-15.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.40x22.75x5.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.83x24.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.41x2.77x1.09x2.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.20x0.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — RUN and SPWR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SHLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for SHLS. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs SMXT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSMXT logoSMXTSolarmax Technolo…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.7%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-15.9%+3.7%+2.5%-19.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-117.0%+5.9%-0.5%-5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.2%+7.6%-0.6%-7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92565
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x2.99x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$34M$168M$13.6B$179M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$786,333$7M$1.2B$10M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$35M$175M$14.9B$188M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.61x5.91x-0.02x-1.57x
SHLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RUN five years ago would be worth $3,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,489 for SMXT. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +86.7% total return vs SMXT's -49.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RUN at -7.1% vs SMXT's -47.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMXT logoSMXTSolarmax Technolo…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-32.3%-13.8%-29.0%-38.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-49.5%+66.5%+86.7%-42.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.1%-60.2%-19.7%-81.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.1%-72.8%-69.8%-81.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.1%-74.7%+86.7%-81.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-47.0%-26.5%-7.1%-42.8%
RUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SMXT and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SMXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 69.0% from its 52-week high vs SMXT's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMXT logoSMXTSolarmax Technolo…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.11x2.08x2.89x2.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.50$11.36$22.44$2.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.48$3.81$5.38$0.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+23.8%+69.0%+61.5%+44.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.063.249.045.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded176K5.1M10.4M1.7M
Evenly matched — SMXT and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SHLS as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 25.4% for SHLS (target: $10).

MetricSMXT logoSMXTSolarmax Technolo…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.83$18.14$15.81
# AnalystsCovering analysts233645
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). RUN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallShoals Technologies Group, … (SHLS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMXT vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 5% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR?

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR?

Over the past 5 years, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) delivered a total return of -69. 8%, compared to -85. 1% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUN returned +86. 7% versus SMXT's -85. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solarmax Technology Inc.

Common Stock (SMXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 160% more volatile than SMXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -57. 5% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR?

Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -152. 1% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -144. 0% for SMXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.

(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 17. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SMXT or SHLS or RUN or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Solarmax Technology Inc.

Common Stock (SMXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMXT: -85. 1%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMXT and SHLS and RUN and SPWR?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SMXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SMXT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 191%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SMXT and SHLS and RUN and SPWR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SMXT: 383.3% · SHLS: 74.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.