Solar
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SMXT vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
SMXT vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $32M | $866M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 7.7% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -13.1% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.1x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $786K | $10M |
SMXT vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solarmax Technology… (SMXT) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMXT vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMXT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.11
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 0.60x
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 0.60x
SPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 65.3%
- -81.3% 10Y total return vs SMXT's -85.1%
- 2.9% revenue growth vs SMXT's -57.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9% revenue growth vs SMXT's -57.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.2% margin vs SMXT's -18.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs SPWR's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -42.4% vs SMXT's -49.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -15.9% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC -117.0% vs -5.3% |
SMXT vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SMXT and SPWR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $315M annually — 6.2x SMXT's $51M. SPWR is the more profitable business, keeping -13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMXT's -18.4%. On growth, SMXT holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.1% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.5% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SMXT and SPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $866M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.77x | -15.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPWR scores 5/9 vs SMXT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.9% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -117.0% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.2% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $786,333 | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.61x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPWR five years ago would be worth $1,872 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,489 for SMXT. Over the past 12 months, SPWR leads with a -42.4% total return vs SMXT's -49.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPWR at -42.8% vs SMXT's -47.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.3% | -38.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.5% | -42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -81.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.0% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMXT and SPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPWR currently trades 44.9% from its 52-week high vs SMXT's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.8% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 176K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
SMXT vs SPWR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMXT or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is the stronger pick with 2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 5% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). Analysts rate SunPower Inc. (SPWR) a "Hold" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SMXT or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) delivered a total return of -81. 3%, compared to -85. 1% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPWR returned -81. 3% versus SMXT's -85. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SMXT or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solarmax Technology Inc.
Common Stock (SMXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus SunPower Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning SPWR is approximately 92% more volatile than SMXT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SMXT or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is pulling ahead at 2. 9% versus -57. 5% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SMXT or SPWR?
SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 5% net margin versus -152. 1% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps -10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPWR leads at -2. 0% versus -144. 0% for SMXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SMXT or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SMXT or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Solarmax Technology Inc.
Common Stock (SMXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMXT: -85. 1%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SMXT and SPWR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.