Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SN vs NVCR vs NKTR vs HELE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
Household & Personal Products
SN vs NVCR vs NKTR vs HELE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $16.01B | $1.92B | $1.69B | $595M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.18B | $674M | $55M | $1.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $705M | $-173M | $-164M | $-899M |
| Gross Margin | 62.1% | 75.2% | 99.6% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | -27.2% | -237.9% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | — | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $902M | $290M | $149M | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $777M | $103M | $15M | $19M |
SN vs NVCR vs NKTR vs HELE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) | 100 | 267.4 | +167.4% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 1029.3 | +929.3% |
| Helen of Troy Limit… (HELE) | 100 | 18.3 | -81.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SN vs NVCR vs NKTR vs HELE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
- 169.9% 10Y total return vs NKTR's -59.1%
- 15.7% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
- 13.6% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.85, current ratio 4.97x
- +8.2% vs NVCR's +1.1%
HELE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.65
- Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 9.8%, current ratio 1.71x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.65 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.65 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs NVCR's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 26.0% vs -57.2% |
SN vs NVCR vs NKTR vs HELE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SN vs NVCR vs NKTR vs HELE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SN leads in 2 of 6 categories
HELE leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 93.7x NKTR's $55M. SN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $674M | $55M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | -$165M | -$130M | $107M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $705M | -$173M | -$164M | -$899M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $383M | -$48M | -$209M | $171M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.1% | +75.2% | +99.6% | +45.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | -27.2% | -2.4% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | -25.7% | -3.0% | -50.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -7.1% | -3.8% | +9.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +12.3% | -25.3% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -100.0% | -4.5% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HELE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.0B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $595M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.1B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $654M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.90x | -13.80x | -8.57x | -0.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.71x | — | — | 7.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.21x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.50x | 2.92x | 30.64x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.01x | 5.51x | 15.66x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.75x | — | — | 3.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SN delivers a 28.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. HELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SN scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.0% | -50.8% | -4.0% | -94.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.2% | -16.5% | -62.8% | -37.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.0% | -16.4% | -57.2% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.6% | -28.9% | -55.7% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.85x | 1.66x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $124M | $187M | $134M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $777M | $103M | $15M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $902M | $290M | $149M | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.93x | -96.80x | -4.74x | -5.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SN five years ago would be worth $26,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs NVCR's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.6% | +28.3% | +92.0% | +25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.3% | +1.1% | +818.2% | +5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | -75.7% | +621.8% | -73.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | -91.3% | -72.3% | -88.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | +30.3% | -59.1% | -74.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.2% | -37.6% | +93.3% | -35.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SN and HELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HELE is the less volatile stock with a 1.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SN currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs HELE's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 2.20x | 1.85x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.99 | $20.06 | $109.00 | $33.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $79.33 | $9.82 | $7.99 | $13.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +83.9% | +76.5% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 69.8 | 53.4 | 78.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.5M | 991K | 627K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SN as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", HELE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs -14.8% for HELE (target: $22).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.83 | $33.50 | $132.83 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 15 | 33 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
SN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HELE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SN vs NVCR vs NKTR vs HELE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SharkNinja, Inc.
(SN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (18. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE?
On forward P/E, Helen of Troy Limited is actually cheaper at 7.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE?
Over the past 5 years, SharkNinja, Inc.
(SN) delivered a total return of +169. 9%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SN returned +169. 9% versus HELE's -74. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
65β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 33% more volatile than HELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SharkNinja, Inc.
(SN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SharkNinja, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -827. 7% for Helen of Troy Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SN leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE?
SharkNinja, Inc.
(SN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 0% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SN leads at 14. 4% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for SharkNinja, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SN or NVCR or NKTR or HELE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HELE: -74. 4%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SN and NVCR and NKTR and HELE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SN (Consumer Cyclical) and NVCR (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare) and HELE (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.