Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNA vs SWK vs KMT vs ITW vs TTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Industrial - Machinery
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
SNA vs SWK vs KMT vs ITW vs TTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $19.30B | $12.47B | $3.18B | $73.64B | $9.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.12B | $15.23B | $2.14B | $16.22B | $4.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $371M | $137M | $3.13B | $331M |
| Gross Margin | 51.3% | 30.0% | 31.9% | 44.1% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 7.8% | 9.5% | 26.4% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.4x | 17.6x | 17.1x | 22.7x | 21.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $5.86B | $643M | $8.97B | $1.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.62B | $280M | $141M | $851M | $341M |
SNA vs SWK vs KMT vs ITW vs TTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 285.9 | +185.9% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Kennametal Inc. (KMT) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
| The Toro Company (TTC) | 100 | 134.2 | +34.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNA vs SWK vs KMT vs ITW vs TTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 0.9%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 4.79x
- PEG 1.78 vs TTC's 23.10
- 0.9% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9%
SWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs TTC's 1.6%
KMT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +115.0% vs ITW's +9.0%
ITW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.4%
- 189.4% 10Y total return vs SNA's 166.1%
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83
Among these 5 stocks, TTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.9% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 22.7x), PEG 1.78 vs 2.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs TTC's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.0% vs ITW's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 29.0% vs 5.8% |
SNA vs SWK vs KMT vs ITW vs TTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNA vs SWK vs KMT vs ITW vs TTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNA leads in 1 of 6 categories
SWK leads 1 • KMT leads 1 • ITW leads 0 • TTC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 7.6x KMT's $2.1B. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWK's 2.4%. On growth, KMT holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.1B | $15.2B | $2.1B | $16.2B | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $1.7B | $238M | $4.6B | $566M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $371M | $137M | $3.1B | $331M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $726M | $73M | $2.2B | $661M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.3% | +30.0% | +31.9% | +44.1% | +33.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +7.8% | +9.5% | +26.4% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +2.4% | +6.4% | +19.3% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +4.8% | +3.4% | +13.6% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +2.7% | +21.8% | +4.6% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -35.0% | +82.9% | +11.8% | +32.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SWK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, SNA trades at a 44% valuation discount to KMT's 34.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SNA offers better value at 1.77x vs TTC's 23.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.3B | $12.5B | $3.2B | $73.6B | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.0B | $18.0B | $3.7B | $81.8B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.32x | 30.26x | 34.74x | 24.36x | 30.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.40x | 17.64x | 17.09x | 22.68x | 20.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.77x | — | — | 2.53x | 23.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.33x | 11.71x | 13.16x | 17.74x | 15.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.74x | 0.82x | 1.62x | 4.59x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 1.35x | 2.45x | 23.15x | 6.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.19x | 18.12x | 26.62x | 27.20x | 15.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SNA and ITW each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK. SNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNA scores 6/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +4.1% | +10.1% | +97.4% | +23.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.2% | +1.7% | +5.3% | +19.4% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +5.8% | +5.9% | +29.0% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.4% | +7.0% | +6.8% | +38.7% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.65x | 0.49x | 2.78x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | $5.6B | $503M | $8.1B | $681M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $280M | $141M | $851M | $341M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $5.9B | $643M | $9.0B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.12x | 2.07x | 5.29x | 14.53x | 7.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNA five years ago would be worth $16,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, KMT leads with a +115.0% total return vs ITW's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KMT at 17.9% vs TTC's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +5.9% | +44.5% | +3.1% | +19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | +41.7% | +115.0% | +9.0% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | +6.9% | +63.7% | +19.5% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | -56.2% | +9.3% | +18.9% | -12.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.1% | -1.5% | +120.9% | +189.4% | +144.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +2.2% | +17.9% | +6.1% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KMT and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KMT currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs ITW's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.83x | 1.31x | 0.67x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $400.88 | $93.37 | $43.81 | $303.16 | $105.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $301.82 | $58.23 | $17.62 | $236.68 | $67.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.5% | +85.9% | +95.2% | +84.3% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 61.0 | 68.4 | 45.3 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 370K | 2.0M | 1.3M | 1.2M | 797K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWK and TTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNA as "Buy", SWK as "Hold", KMT as "Hold", ITW as "Hold", TTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.4% upside for SNA (target: $413) vs -13.6% for KMT (target: $36). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs TTC's 1.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $413.00 | $89.17 | $36.00 | $273.67 | $86.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 37 | 23 | 28 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +4.1% | +1.9% | +2.4% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 16 | 2 | 12 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.72 | $3.29 | $0.79 | $6.11 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.1% | +1.9% | +2.0% | +3.1% |
SNA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SWK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SNA vs SWK vs KMT vs ITW vs TTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger pick with 0.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC?
On trailing P/E, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus Kennametal Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, Kennametal Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Snap-on Incorporated wins at 1. 78x versus The Toro Company's 23. 10x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC?
Over the past 5 years, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITW returned +189. 4% versus SWK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 173% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is pulling ahead at 0.
9% versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to -20. 9% for The Toro Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNA leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 2. 7% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 3% for KMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 78x versus The Toro Company's 23. 10x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Kennametal Inc. (KMT) trades at 17. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 7x for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNA: 11. 4% to $413. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 6% for The Toro Company (TTC).
09Is SNA or SWK or KMT or ITW or TTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 4% yield, +189. 4% 10Y return). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +189. 4%, SWK: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNA and SWK and KMT and ITW and TTC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.