Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SNAX vs NXRT vs HIMS vs IRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
Medical - Equipment & Services
REIT - Residential
SNAX vs NXRT vs HIMS vs IRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | REIT - Residential | Medical - Equipment & Services | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $144K | $696M | $6.62B | $3.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $252M | $2.37B | $662M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-32M | $-13M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 91.1% | 67.6% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | -60.4% | 11.5% | 1.3% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 59.2x | 113.5x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $1.56B | $1.26B | $2.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $369K | $14M | $229M | $48M |
SNAX vs NXRT vs HIMS vs IRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 82.2 | -17.8% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 257.1 | +157.1% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 141.3 | +41.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNAX vs NXRT vs HIMS vs IRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNAX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 7.7%
- Beta 0.53, yield 7.7%, current ratio 0.48x
- 7.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs IRT's 4.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 207.9% 10Y total return vs IRT's 202.4%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9%
- Lower P/E (59.2x vs 113.5x)
IRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 63.6%, current ratio 0.05x
- 7.3% margin vs SNAX's -79.1%
- Beta 0.30 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage
- -3.9% vs SNAX's -87.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (59.2x vs 113.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs SNAX's -79.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs IRT's 4.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.9% vs SNAX's -87.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.8% ROA vs SNAX's -47.8%, ROIC 1.6% vs -39.0% |
SNAX vs NXRT vs HIMS vs IRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAX vs NXRT vs HIMS vs IRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IRT leads in 1 of 6 categories
HIMS leads 1 • NXRT leads 1 • SNAX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNAX and NXRT and IRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 122.4x SNAX's $19M. IRT is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAX's -79.1%. On growth, SNAX holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $252M | $2.4B | $662M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $125M | $99M | $365M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$32M | -$13M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $79M | $76M | $139M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +91.1% | +67.6% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.4% | +11.5% | +1.3% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.1% | -12.7% | -0.6% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.2% | +31.2% | +3.2% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +0.5% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | 0.0% | -3.0% | -101.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNAX and NXRT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 59.2x trailing earnings, HIMS trades at a 14% valuation discount to IRT's 69.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IRT's 16.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 47.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $143,748 | $696M | $6.6B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $2.2B | $7.7B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -21.76x | 59.16x | 69.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 113.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.11x | 47.84x | 16.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 2.77x | 2.82x | 5.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 2.32x | 14.40x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.32x | 89.56x | 26.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRT delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SNAX. IRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAX's 15.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs SNAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -10.1% | -2.5% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.8% | -1.7% | -0.6% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.0% | +1.1% | +8.6% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -62.4% | +1.5% | +9.4% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 15.06x | 5.18x | 2.34x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $1.5B | $1.0B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $369,114 | $14M | $229M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $1.6B | $1.3B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.69x | 0.47x | — | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $24,996 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for SNAX. Over the past 12 months, IRT leads with a -3.9% total return vs SNAX's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 50.8% vs SNAX's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1000.0% | -3.7% | -9.7% | -4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.3% | -9.7% | -49.5% | -3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -27.4% | +242.8% | -0.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -35.4% | +150.0% | +6.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +170.0% | +207.9% | +202.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.1% | -10.1% | +50.8% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNAX and IRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNAX is the less volatile stock with a -3.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRT currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs SNAX's 8.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -3.16x | 0.53x | 2.48x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.39 | $35.08 | $70.43 | $18.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $23.79 | $13.74 | $14.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.5% | +78.2% | +42.8% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 50.1 | 51.5 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 584 | 160K | 24.7M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", IRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.5% upside for IRT (target: $20) vs -10.5% for HIMS (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.69% vs IRT's 3.96%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $27.00 | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 20 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.7% | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.11 | — | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.4% | +0.8% |
IRT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). HIMS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SNAX vs NXRT vs HIMS vs IRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 59. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT?
On trailing P/E, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the cheapest at 59. 2x versus Independence Realty Trust, Inc. at 69. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +150. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +207. 9% versus SNAX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryve Foods, Inc.
(SNAX) is the lower-risk stock at -3. 16β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately -179% more volatile than SNAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 15% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stryve Foods, Inc. grew EPS 47. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT?
Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -107. 5% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRT leads at 18. 4% versus -87. 1% for SNAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IRT: 17.
5% to $19. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT?
In this comparison, NXRT (7.
7% yield), IRT (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SNAX, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNAX or NXRT or HIMS or IRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryve Foods, Inc.
(SNAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3. 16)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNAX: -100. 0%, HIMS: +207. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNAX and NXRT and HIMS and IRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SNAX (Consumer Defensive) and NXRT (Real Estate) and HIMS (Healthcare) and IRT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SNAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NXRT, IRT pay a dividend while SNAX, HIMS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.