Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDA vs BKD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
SNDA vs BKD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $706M | $3.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $381M | $3.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-71M | $-205M |
| Gross Margin | -8.0% | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | 1.3% |
| Total Debt | $690M | $6.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $279M |
SNDA vs BKD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sonida Senior Livin… (SNDA) | 100 | 375.3 | +275.3% |
| Brookdale Senior Li… (BKD) | 100 | 387.4 | +287.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDA vs BKD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 25.2%, EPS growth -6.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.9%
- 25.2% revenue growth vs BKD's 4.8%
BKD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -21.8% 10Y total return vs SNDA's -87.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 3.62x
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 3.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.2% revenue growth vs BKD's 4.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs SNDA's -18.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SNDA's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.1% vs SNDA's +59.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.4% ROA vs SNDA's -8.4%, ROIC 0.2% vs -5.8% |
SNDA vs BKD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNDA vs BKD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 8.2x SNDA's $381M. BKD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNDA's -18.7%. On growth, SNDA holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $381M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $381M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$71M | -$205M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +13.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.7% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +89.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $706M | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.80x | -12.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 1.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.94x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNDA delivers a -76.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-76 in annual profit, vs $-235 for BKD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKD scores 4/9 vs SNDA's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -76.4% | -234.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.4% | -3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | +0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.26x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $679M | $6.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $279M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $690M | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.86x | -0.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKD five years ago would be worth $21,485 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,283 for SNDA. Over the past 12 months, BKD leads with a +110.1% total return vs SNDA's +59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNDA at 74.8% vs BKD's 52.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.3% | +30.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.2% | +110.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +434.5% | +255.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | +114.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | -21.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +74.8% | +52.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNDA and BKD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKD is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNDA's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNDA currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs BKD's 83.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.98 | $17.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.93 | $6.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.6 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 590K | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SNDA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNDA as "Hold" and BKD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.6% upside for BKD (target: $18) vs -6.7% for SNDA (target: $35). SNDA is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.67 | $17.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
BKD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SNDA leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SNDA vs BKD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDA or BKD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonida Senior Living, Inc.
(SNDA) is the stronger pick with 25. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD). Analysts rate Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SNDA or BKD?
Over the past 5 years, Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
(BKD) delivered a total return of +114. 8%, compared to -17. 2% for Sonida Senior Living, Inc. (SNDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKD returned -21. 8% versus SNDA's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SNDA or BKD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
(BKD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Sonida Senior Living, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning SNDA is approximately 64% more volatile than BKD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SNDA or BKD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonida Senior Living, Inc.
(SNDA) is pulling ahead at 25. 2% versus 4. 8% for Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookdale Senior Living Inc. grew EPS -24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -681. 5% for Sonida Senior Living, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNDA leads at 16. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SNDA or BKD?
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
(BKD) is the more profitable company, earning -8. 4% net margin versus -20. 0% for Sonida Senior Living, Inc. — meaning it keeps -8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKD leads at 0. 5% versus -15. 3% for SNDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKD leads at 20. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SNDA or BKD?
In this comparison, SNDA (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BKD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SNDA or BKD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonida Senior Living, Inc.
(SNDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNDA: -87. 5%, BKD: -21. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SNDA and BKD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNDA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SNDA pays a dividend while BKD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.