Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SNX vs SCSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
SNX vs SCSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $18.77B | $952M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62.51B | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $828M | $73M |
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.9x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.61B | $147M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.44B | $126M |
SNX vs SCSC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 176.1 | +76.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNX vs SCSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs SCSC's 9.7%
SCSC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.9x)
- 2.4% margin vs SNX's 1.3%
- 4.2% ROA vs SNX's 2.4%, ROIC 7.0% vs 9.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs SNX's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs SCSC's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs SCSC's +20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs SNX's 2.4%, ROIC 7.0% vs 9.9% |
SNX vs SCSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNX vs SCSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 20.3x SCSC's $3.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.4% (SCSC) to 1.3% (SNX).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62.5B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $114M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $828M | $73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +13.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SCSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SCSC trades at a 38% valuation discount to SNX's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCSC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SNX's 11.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.8B | $952M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.9B | $973M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.36x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.88x | 10.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.40x | 8.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.51x | 9.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCSC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNX delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for SCSC. SCSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNX's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs SNX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $126M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $147M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.96x | 11.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $19,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,433 for SCSC. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs SCSC's +20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs SCSC's 18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.1% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.2% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.4% | +64.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.2% | +34.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +505.0% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.3% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
SNX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNX is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCSC's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs SCSC's 93.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $237.51 | $46.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $114.05 | $33.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.3 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 735K | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNX as "Buy" and SCSC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.9% upside for SCSC (target: $43) vs -23.9% for SNX (target: $177). SNX is the only dividend payer here at 0.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $177.00 | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.78 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +11.2% |
SCSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SNX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
SNX vs SCSC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNX or SCSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNX or SCSC?
On trailing P/E, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus TD SYNNEX Corporation at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, ScanSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNX or SCSC?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +94.
2%, compared to +34. 3% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus SCSC's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNX or SCSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
43β versus ScanSource, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SCSC is approximately 3% more volatile than SNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 55% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNX or SCSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -2. 0% for ScanSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNX or SCSC?
ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus 1. 3% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCSC leads at 2. 8% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCSC leads at 13. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNX or SCSC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for TD SYNNEX Corporation — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCSC: -0. 9% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNX or SCSC?
In this comparison, SNX (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SCSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNX or SCSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNX: +505. 0%, SCSC: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNX and SCSC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock. SNX pays a dividend while SCSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.