Medical - Distribution
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SNYR vs NTRP vs MMYT vs PRGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
SNYR vs NTRP vs MMYT vs PRGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Distribution | Travel Services | Travel Services | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $4M | $19M | $4.52B | $1.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $2M | $1.04B | $4.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-15M | $57M | $-1.82B |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | -22.2% | 73.4% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | -6.0% | 14.1% | -4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | — | 73.2x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $568K | $237M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $688K | $1M | $509M | $532M |
SNYR vs NTRP vs MMYT vs PRGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR) | 100 | 26.9 | -73.1% |
| NextTrip, Inc. (NTRP) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 326.1 | +226.1% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNYR vs NTRP vs MMYT vs PRGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNYR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.79
- Beta 0.79, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 73.2x)
- 7.5% margin vs NTRP's -7.0%
NTRP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 7.7%, current ratio 0.96x
- +24.5% vs SNYR's -78.8%
MMYT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
- 190.1% 10Y total return vs PRGO's -77.7%
- 25.0% revenue growth vs SNYR's -18.6%
PRGO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs SNYR's -18.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 73.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs NTRP's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs PRGO's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.5% vs SNYR's -78.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs NTRP's -123.7%, ROIC 88.1% vs -120.2% |
SNYR vs NTRP vs MMYT vs PRGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNYR vs NTRP vs MMYT vs PRGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
MMYT leads 2 • SNYR leads 0 • NTRP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNYR and NTRP and MMYT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 1916.6x NTRP's $2M. SNYR is the more profitable business, keeping 7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRP's -7.0%. On growth, NTRP holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $2M | $1.0B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | -$12M | $175M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$15M | $57M | -$1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$4M | $224M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.0% | -22.2% | +73.4% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | -6.0% | +14.1% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | -7.0% | +5.5% | -43.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | -194.6% | +21.5% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +15.1% | +10.6% | -7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.6% | -5.7% | -68.3% | -56.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.4x trailing earnings, SNYR trades at a 98% valuation discount to MMYT's 60.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SNYR's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MMYT's 28.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $19M | $4.5B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $19M | $4.3B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.41x | -1.18x | 60.86x | -1.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 73.17x | 5.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.27x | — | 28.92x | 7.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 38.62x | 4.62x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.64x | 4.79x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 26.07x | 11.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NTRP. NTRP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMYT scores 6/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -2.3% | +8.2% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | -123.7% | +3.1% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +88.1% | -120.2% | +9.2% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -160.4% | +9.2% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 0.20x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | -$494,837 | -$272M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $687,920 | $1M | $509M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $567,530 | $237M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | -10.16x | 1.67x | -7.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMYT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $377 for NTRP. Over the past 12 months, NTRP leads with a +24.5% total return vs SNYR's -78.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMYT at 25.5% vs NTRP's -32.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -79.0% | -22.2% | -38.3% | -13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.8% | +24.5% | -54.9% | -51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | -68.7% | +97.5% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | -96.2% | +97.0% | -60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.7% | -99.8% | +190.1% | -77.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | -32.1% | +25.5% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNYR and NTRP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRGO's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTRP currently trades 50.7% from its 52-week high vs SNYR's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.06x | 1.17x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $5.20 | $113.85 | $28.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.30 | $1.72 | $32.84 | $9.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.9% | +50.7% | +44.4% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.0 | 42.6 | 59.4 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 79K | 1.5M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MMYT as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 70.6% for PRGO (target: $20). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $91.00 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 11 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MMYT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SNYR vs NTRP vs MMYT vs PRGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 6% for Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR). Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR) offers the better valuation at 1. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO?
On trailing P/E, Synergy CHC Corp.
(SNYR) is the cheapest at 1. 4x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -96. 2% for NextTrip, Inc. (NTRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMYT returned +190. 1% versus NTRP's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Synergy CHC Corp.
(SNYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Perrigo Company plc's 1. 18β — meaning PRGO is approximately 50% more volatile than SNYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NextTrip, Inc. (NTRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus -18. 6% for Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Synergy CHC Corp. grew EPS 297. 2% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO?
MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus -20. 2% for NextTrip, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNYR leads at 16. 7% versus -1677. 9% for NTRP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMYT leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 67. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SNYR, NTRP, MMYT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNYR or NTRP or MMYT or PRGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
18), 9. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRGO: -77. 7%, NTRP: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNYR and NTRP and MMYT and PRGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (SNYR (Healthcare) and NTRP (Consumer Cyclical) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical) and PRGO (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SNYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO pays a dividend while SNYR, NTRP, MMYT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.