SOHO vs INN vs APLE vs CLDT

For growth investors, Sotherly Hotels Inc.

(SOHO) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus Chatham Lodging Trust at 71. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) delivered a total return of +13. 7%, compared to -36. 1% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLE returned +17. 6% versus CLDT's -29. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sotherly Hotels Inc.

(SOHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning INN is approximately 160% more volatile than SOHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 8% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sotherly Hotels Inc.

(SOHO) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chatham Lodging Trust grew EPS 275. 0% year-over-year, compared to -215. 8% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOHO leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -1. 1% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLE leads at 17. 7% versus 8. 4% for INN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOHO leads at 25. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLDT: 10.

2% to $11. 00.

In this comparison, SOHO (18.

3% yield), APLE (6. 9% yield) pay a dividend. INN, CLDT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sotherly Hotels Inc.

(SOHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 18. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOHO: -26. 4%, INN: -28. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SOHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; INN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APLE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLDT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SOHO, APLE pay a dividend while INN, CLDT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.