SORA vs CLPS vs CAN vs CODA vs MARA

For growth investors, Canaan Inc.

(CAN) is the stronger pick with 96. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for AsiaStrategy (SORA). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canaan Inc. (CAN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -92. 3% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus CAN's -90. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Canaan Inc. 's 4. 41β — meaning CAN is approximately 1524% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for AsiaStrategy — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Canaan Inc.

(CAN) is pulling ahead at 96. 7% versus -6. 4% for AsiaStrategy (SORA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Canaan Inc. grew EPS 51. 1% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAN: 336.

9% to $2. 25.

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. SORA, CAN, CODA, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). Canaan Inc. (CAN) carries a higher beta of 4. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, CAN: -90. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SORA (Consumer Cyclical) and CLPS (Technology) and CAN (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SORA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while SORA, CAN, CODA, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.