Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SOUN vs AIXI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
SOUN vs AIXI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $169M | $115M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | -13.8% | -44.2% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $248M | $847K |
SOUN vs AIXI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) | 100 | 339.5 | +239.5% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOUN vs AIXI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 99.4%, EPS growth 73.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 75.7%
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs AIXI's -98.6%
- 99.4% revenue growth vs AIXI's 18.8%
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.94
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 0.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.4% revenue growth vs AIXI's 18.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -8.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs SOUN's 3.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.5% vs AIXI's -77.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.0% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC -16.8% vs -34.4% |
SOUN vs AIXI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOUN vs AIXI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOUN and AIXI operate at a comparable scale, with $169M and $115M in trailing revenue. SOUN is the more profitable business, keeping -8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, SOUN holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $169M | $115M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | -$49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $76.1B | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | +64.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.8% | -44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | -45.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +450.8% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | -64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.7% | -29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOUN and AIXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $53M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.46x | -0.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.77x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6839.42x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SOUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | -65.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.8% | -34.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$244M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $248M | $846,593 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $46M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -114.81x | -14.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOUN five years ago would be worth $12,493 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $143 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, SOUN leads with a +2.5% total return vs AIXI's -77.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOUN at 51.0% vs AIXI's -75.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.6% | +73.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.5% | -77.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +244.5% | -98.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.0% | -75.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SOUN and AIXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOUN's 3.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOUN currently trades 42.3% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.58x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.17 | $4.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.83 | $0.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.3% | +18.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.7M | 60.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SOUN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SOUN vs AIXI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOUN or AIXI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is the stronger pick with 99. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 8% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Analysts rate SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOUN or AIXI?
Over the past 5 years, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) delivered a total return of +24. 9%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOUN returned +24. 9% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOUN or AIXI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus SoundHound AI, Inc. 's 3. 58β — meaning SOUN is approximately 279% more volatile than AIXI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SOUN or AIXI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is pulling ahead at 99. 4% versus 18. 8% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SoundHound AI, Inc. grew EPS 73. 1% year-over-year, compared to 52. 7% for Xiao-I Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOUN leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SOUN or AIXI?
SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is the more profitable company, earning -8. 3% net margin versus -20. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps -8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOUN leads at -13. 8% versus -18. 3% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SOUN or AIXI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SOUN or AIXI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94)). SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) carries a higher beta of 3. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIXI: -98. 6%, SOUN: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SOUN and AIXI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.