Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SOUN vs ITRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
SOUN vs ITRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $4.10B | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $169M | $359M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13.8% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $248M | $108M |
SOUN vs ITRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 262.7 | +162.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOUN vs ITRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 99.4%, EPS growth 96.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 75.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.58, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 4.59x
- 99.4% revenue growth vs ITRN's 6.8%
ITRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
- 233.6% 10Y total return vs SOUN's 28.4%
- Beta 1.18, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.4% revenue growth vs ITRN's 6.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs SOUN's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs SOUN's 3.58 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.7% vs SOUN's +5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs SOUN's -2.2%, ROIC 47.2% vs -16.8% |
SOUN vs ITRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOUN vs ITRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $359M annually — 2.1x SOUN's $169M. ITRN is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOUN's -8.3%. On growth, SOUN holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $169M | $359M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $52M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.8% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.5% | +19.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.9% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ITRN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ITRN's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOUN's 355.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -278.32x | 20.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 355.51x | 13.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.30x | 3.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.42x | 5.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SOUN. SOUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITRN's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITRN scores 7/9 vs SOUN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +27.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.8% | +47.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | +29.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$244M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $248M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.84x | 32.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITRN five years ago would be worth $28,016 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,840 for SOUN. Over the past 12 months, ITRN leads with a +76.7% total return vs SOUN's +5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOUN at 52.4% vs ITRN's 45.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.2% | +42.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | +76.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.0% | +206.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.4% | +180.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.4% | +233.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.4% | +45.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOUN's 3.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SOUN's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.58x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.17 | $59.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.83 | $32.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.4% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.6 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.9M | 118K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SOUN as "Buy" and ITRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.4% upside for SOUN (target: $13) vs -5.0% for ITRN (target: $56). ITRN is the only dividend payer here at 3.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.33 | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ITRN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
SOUN vs ITRN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOUN or ITRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is the stronger pick with 99. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOUN or ITRN?
Over the past 5 years, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) delivered a total return of +180. 2%, compared to +28. 4% for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITRN returned +233. 6% versus SOUN's +28. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOUN or ITRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus SoundHound AI, Inc. 's 3. 58β — meaning SOUN is approximately 204% more volatile than ITRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SOUN or ITRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is pulling ahead at 99. 4% versus 6. 8% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SoundHound AI, Inc. grew EPS 96. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOUN leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SOUN or ITRN?
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -8. 3% for SoundHound AI, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus -13. 8% for SOUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITRN leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SOUN or ITRN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOUN: 38.
4% to $13. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — SOUN or ITRN?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SOUN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SOUN or ITRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), 3. 2% yield, +233. 6% 10Y return). SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) carries a higher beta of 3. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITRN: +233. 6%, SOUN: +28. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SOUN and ITRN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SOUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ITRN pays a dividend while SOUN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.