Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPWH vs ASO vs DKS vs CATO vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Apparel - Retail
Specialty Retail
SPWH vs ASO vs DKS vs CATO vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Apparel - Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $55M | $3.48B | $20.22B | $53M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $6.05B | $17.22B | $660M | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $377M | $849M | $-10M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 31.2% | 34.8% | 32.9% | 32.2% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | 8.5% | 7.7% | -2.4% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.1x | 15.6x | — | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $455M | $1.41B | $4.49B | $146M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $330M | $1.69B | $20M | $10.73B |
SPWH vs ASO vs DKS vs CATO vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 10.9 | -89.1% |
| Academy Sports and … (ASO) | 100 | 364.3 | +264.3% |
| DICK'S Sporting Goo… (DKS) | 100 | 392.4 | +292.4% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 47.7 | -52.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 281.5 | +181.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPWH vs ASO vs DKS vs CATO vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SPWH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ASO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.88 vs WMT's 4.06
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.88 vs 4.06
- 6.2% margin vs SPWH's -3.1%
- +39.1% vs SPWH's -17.4%
DKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 1530.03x
- Beta 1.45, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1530.03x
- 28.1% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2%
CATO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 18.7% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs DKS's 450.0%
- Beta 0.12 vs SPWH's 1.80, lower leverage
- 7.9% ROA vs SPWH's -3.9%, ROIC 14.7% vs -1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.1% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.88 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs SPWH's -3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SPWH's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.7% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.1% vs SPWH's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs SPWH's -3.9%, ROIC 14.7% vs -1.9% |
SPWH vs ASO vs DKS vs CATO vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPWH vs ASO vs DKS vs CATO vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASO leads 2 • SPWH leads 0 • DKS leads 0 • CATO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 1065.1x CATO's $660M. ASO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWH's -3.1%. On growth, DKS holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $6.1B | $17.2B | $660M | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $635M | $1.4B | -$5M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $377M | $849M | -$10M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$55M | $264M | $399.7B | -$7M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +34.8% | +32.9% | +32.2% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +8.5% | +7.7% | -2.4% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +6.2% | +4.9% | -1.5% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +4.4% | +23.2% | -1.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | +2.5% | +59.9% | +6.3% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +8.2% | -61.0% | +64.6% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ASO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, ASO trades at a 80% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ASO offers better value at 0.94x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $3.5B | $20.2B | $53M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $507M | $4.6B | $23.0B | $178M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.63x | 9.67x | 22.29x | -3.01x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.11x | 15.56x | — | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.94x | 1.90x | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.78x | 7.18x | 12.66x | — | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 0.57x | 1.17x | 0.08x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 1.68x | 0.00x | 0.35x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.78x | 15.66x | 0.05x | — | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SPWH. DKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASO scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.9% | +18.1% | +0.1% | -5.8% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +7.1% | +6.1% | -2.2% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +11.4% | +0.0% | -6.7% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | +12.5% | +0.0% | -9.6% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.93x | 0.65x | 0.00x | 0.90x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $452M | $1.1B | $2.8B | $126M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $330M | $1.7B | $20M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $455M | $1.4B | $4.5B | $146M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.26x | 14.33x | 19.04x | -1.77x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $800 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, ASO leads with a +39.1% total return vs SPWH's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs SPWH's -38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +3.0% | +11.6% | -2.7% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.4% | +39.1% | +20.6% | +27.5% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.2% | -9.4% | +67.2% | -52.4% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | +63.6% | +173.8% | -60.4% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | +325.9% | +450.0% | -72.3% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.9% | -3.2% | +18.7% | -21.9% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWH's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.72x | 1.45x | 0.88x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.33 | $62.45 | $237.31 | $4.92 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.08 | $37.96 | $167.03 | $2.26 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.8% | +85.7% | +93.7% | +59.3% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 46.2 | 59.0 | 48.6 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 833K | 1.4M | 1.1M | 60K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CATO and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASO as "Buy", DKS as "Buy", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.1% upside for DKS (target: $251) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, CATO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.71% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $58.00 | $251.43 | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 63 | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +2.2% | +18.7% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.51 | $4.86 | $0.55 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +5.7% | +1.7% | +7.4% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ASO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SPWH vs ASO vs DKS vs CATO vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger pick with 28. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
(ASO) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. wins at 0. 88x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -92. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus SPWH's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning SPWH is approximately 1444% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is pulling ahead at 28. 1% versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Cato Corporation grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -29. 0% for DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKS leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT?
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus -2. 9% for The Cato Corporation — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASO leads at 8. 5% versus -4. 2% for CATO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASO leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 88x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 35. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKS: 13. 1% to $251. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
7% yield), DKS (2. 2% yield), ASO (1. 0% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SPWH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPWH or ASO or DKS or CATO or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SPWH: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPWH and ASO and DKS and CATO and WMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPWH (Consumer Cyclical) and ASO (Consumer Cyclical) and DKS (Consumer Cyclical) and CATO (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASO is a small-cap deep-value stock; DKS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. ASO, DKS, CATO, WMT pay a dividend while SPWH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.