Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR vs XYL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR vs XYL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.18B | $9.91B | $4.39B | $12.41B | $27.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.35B | $2.56B | $2.18B | $4.20B | $9.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $254M | $366M | $150M | $671M | $973M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 49.2% | 35.2% | 40.9% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | 19.4% | 12.6% | 20.6% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 24.9x | 21.6x | 14.4x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $498M | $198M | $280M | $1.64B | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $364M | $406M | $100M | $102M | $1.48B |
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR vs XYL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPX Technologies, I… (SPXC) | 100 | 507.4 | +407.4% |
| Watts Water Technol… (WTS) | 100 | 357.0 | +257.0% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 195.9 | +95.9% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR vs XYL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPXC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth 17.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs WTS's 457.2%
- 14.2% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
- +35.8% vs PNR's -16.8%
WTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs XYL's 5.6%, ROIC 21.2% vs 7.6%
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.89 vs SPXC's 1.31, lower leverage
PNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.48
- 16.0% margin vs FELE's 6.9%
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 1.4%
- PEG 0.90 vs FELE's 2.48
- 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.2% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs FELE's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs SPXC's 1.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.8% vs PNR's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs XYL's 5.6%, ROIC 21.2% vs 7.6% |
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR vs XYL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR vs XYL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PNR leads in 1 of 6 categories
WTS leads 1 • SPXC leads 1 • FELE leads 1 • XYL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WTS and PNR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 4.2x FELE's $2.2B. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FELE's 6.9%. On growth, WTS holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $2.6B | $2.2B | $4.2B | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $492M | $553M | $322M | $983M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $254M | $366M | $150M | $671M | $973M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $385M | $317M | $169M | $716M | $966M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +49.2% | +35.2% | +40.9% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +19.4% | +12.6% | +20.6% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +14.3% | +6.9% | +16.0% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +12.4% | +7.8% | +17.0% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +21.4% | +9.9% | +2.6% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +34.4% | +13.4% | +12.9% | +14.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.4x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 52% valuation discount to SPXC's 40.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTS offers better value at 1.18x vs FELE's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $9.9B | $4.4B | $12.4B | $27.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $9.7B | $4.6B | $14.0B | $27.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.09x | 29.19x | 30.57x | 19.40x | 29.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.31x | 24.95x | 21.64x | 14.35x | 20.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.11x | 1.18x | 3.51x | 1.48x | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.47x | 18.36x | 13.74x | 14.31x | 15.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.49x | 4.07x | 2.06x | 2.97x | 2.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.40x | 4.91x | 3.39x | 3.29x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.20x | 27.83x | 22.67x | 16.64x | 29.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for XYL. WTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PNR's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs FELE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +18.4% | +11.4% | +17.7% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +13.1% | +7.6% | +9.9% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +21.2% | +14.7% | +12.1% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +21.7% | +18.1% | +15.0% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.10x | 0.21x | 0.42x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134M | -$208M | $181M | $1.5B | $463M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $364M | $406M | $100M | $102M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $498M | $198M | $280M | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.50x | 46.73x | 24.75x | 11.94x | 49.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPXC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPXC five years ago would be worth $31,898 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,064 for XYL. Over the past 12 months, SPXC leads with a +35.8% total return vs PNR's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPXC at 41.3% vs FELE's 3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | +6.8% | +3.0% | -26.7% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +27.2% | +14.9% | -16.8% | -6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +182.3% | +77.6% | +9.4% | +36.1% | +10.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.0% | +119.0% | +21.6% | +17.9% | +0.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1169.3% | +457.2% | +229.5% | +121.3% | +200.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.3% | +21.1% | +3.0% | +10.8% | +3.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPXC's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FELE currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 67.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 0.92x | 0.89x | 1.21x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $246.68 | $345.17 | $111.53 | $113.95 | $154.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $147.39 | $221.04 | $83.42 | $76.69 | $113.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +86.0% | +89.1% | +67.4% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 45.8 | 51.4 | 33.7 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 468K | 212K | 275K | 1.6M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FELE and XYL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPXC as "Buy", WTS as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", PNR as "Hold", XYL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 0.7% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.41% vs WTS's 0.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $252.00 | $343.10 | $100.00 | $113.56 | $151.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 23 | 11 | 41 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 32 | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.00 | $1.11 | $0.99 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +1.8% | +0.1% |
PNR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). WTS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR vs XYL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is the stronger pick with 14. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
4x versus SPX Technologies, Inc. at 40. 1x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 90x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL?
Over the past 5 years, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) delivered a total return of +219. 0%, compared to +0. 6% for Xylem Inc. (XYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPXC returned +1169% versus PNR's +121. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus SPX Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning SPXC is approximately 48% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 42% for Pentair plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is pulling ahead at 14. 2% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SPX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 8% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL?
Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 6. 9% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNR leads at 20. 5% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WTS leads at 49. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for SPX Technologies, Inc. — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 47. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL?
In this comparison, XYL (1.
4% yield), PNR (1. 3% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield), WTS (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SPXC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR or XYL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
(WTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 0. 7% yield, +457. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTS: +457. 2%, PNR: +121. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPXC and WTS and FELE and PNR and XYL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WTS, FELE, PNR, XYL pay a dividend while SPXC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.