Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SRAD vs GENI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
SRAD vs GENI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $4.04B | $1.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $-112M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -18.1% |
| Forward P/E | 33.1x | 52.4x |
| Total Debt | $63M | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $365M | $281M |
SRAD vs GENI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) | 100 | 60.3 | -39.7% |
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 25.5 | -74.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRAD vs GENI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.65
- -45.5% 10Y total return vs GENI's -52.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 1.17x
GENI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.0%, EPS growth -63.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 31.0% revenue growth vs SRAD's 12.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.0% revenue growth vs SRAD's 12.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.1x vs 52.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.2% margin vs GENI's -16.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs GENI's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -41.4% vs GENI's -53.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs GENI's -11.1%, ROIC 12.9% vs -16.6% |
SRAD vs GENI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SRAD vs GENI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.0x GENI's $669M. SRAD is the more profitable business, keeping 5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -16.7%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +37.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $308M | -$50M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | -$112M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $363M | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | -18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +37.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -128.5% | +33.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GENI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $924M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.69x | -10.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.09x | 52.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.68x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.74x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 1.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.79x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.98x | 18.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SRAD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SRAD delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-16 for GENI. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SRAD's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRAD scores 4/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | -15.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | -11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.9% | -16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | -15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$302M | -$250M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $365M | $281M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $30M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.02x | -136.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SRAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SRAD five years ago would be worth $5,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,536 for GENI. Over the past 12 months, SRAD leads with a -41.4% total return vs GENI's -53.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GENI at 5.5% vs SRAD's 1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.5% | -55.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.4% | -53.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.7% | +17.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.5% | -74.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.5% | -52.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.9% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SRAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRAD is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GENI's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SRAD currently trades 42.3% from its 52-week high vs GENI's 34.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.22 | $13.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.66 | $3.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.3% | +34.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.7 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SRAD as "Buy" and GENI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $12) vs 59.5% for SRAD (target: $22).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.75 | $12.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | 0.0% |
SRAD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GENI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SRAD vs GENI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRAD or GENI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 0% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRAD or GENI?
On forward P/E, Sportradar Group AG is actually cheaper at 33.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRAD or GENI?
Over the past 5 years, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) delivered a total return of -45.
5%, compared to -74. 6% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SRAD returned -45. 5% versus GENI's -52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRAD or GENI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Genius Sports Limited's 1. 50β — meaning GENI is approximately 130% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 6% for Sportradar Group AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRAD or GENI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus 12. 0% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportradar Group AG grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -63. 0% for Genius Sports Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GENI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRAD or GENI?
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
8% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRAD leads at 9. 1% versus -15. 6% for GENI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GENI leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRAD or GENI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) trades at 33.
1x forward P/E versus 52. 4x for Genius Sports Limited — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRAD or GENI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SRAD or GENI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65)). Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRAD: -45. 5%, GENI: -52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRAD and GENI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SRAD (Technology) and GENI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SRAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 18%
- Gross Margin > 13%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.