SRG vs CBL vs MAC vs SKT

For growth investors, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.

(CBL) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (47. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seritage Growth Properties (SRG) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.

(CBL) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus Tanger Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Tanger Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Tanger Inc.

(SKT) delivered a total return of +134. 8%, compared to -83. 9% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBL returned +78. 3% versus SRG's -89. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tanger Inc.

(SKT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus The Macerich Company's 1. 29β — meaning MAC is approximately 100% more volatile than SKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seritage Growth Properties (SRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 6% for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.

(CBL) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -15. 2% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. grew EPS 132. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for Seritage Growth Properties. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKT leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.

(CBL) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 5% net margin versus -871. 3% for Seritage Growth Properties — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKT leads at 30. 2% versus -259. 9% for SRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAC leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Tanger Inc.

(SKT) trades at 34. 5x forward P/E versus 47. 7x for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAC: 0. 1% to $21. 40.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 3. 2% for The Macerich Company (MAC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.

(CBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBL: +78. 3%, MAC: -55. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SRG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.