Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SRTS vs GKOS vs NVCR vs ISRG vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
SRTS vs GKOS vs NVCR vs ISRG vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $68M | $7.85B | $1.92B | $161.07B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $551M | $674M | $10.58B | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-189M | $-173M | $2.98B | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 78.1% | 75.2% | 66.3% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -37.5% | -15.6% | -27.2% | 30.5% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 43.3x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $680K | $140M | $290M | $303M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $91M | $103M | $3.37B | $2.22B |
SRTS vs GKOS vs NVCR vs ISRG vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensus Healthcare, … (SRTS) | 100 | 128.9 | +28.9% |
| Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) | 100 | 342.5 | +242.5% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 232.8 | +132.8% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRTS vs GKOS vs NVCR vs ISRG vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRTS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 9.72x
- Beta 0.93, current ratio 9.72x
GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.5%
- 32.3% revenue growth vs SRTS's -34.3%
- +52.0% vs ISRG's -15.4%
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ISRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs GKOS's 457.1%
- PEG 1.99 vs MDT's 35.17
- 28.2% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
- 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.3% revenue growth vs SRTS's -34.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs GKOS's -34.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs ISRG's -15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -9.2% |
SRTS vs GKOS vs NVCR vs ISRG vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SRTS vs GKOS vs NVCR vs ISRG vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories
MDT leads 2 • GKOS leads 1 • SRTS leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 1291.2x SRTS's $27M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GKOS's -34.3%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $551M | $674M | $10.6B | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$40M | -$165M | $3.8B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$189M | -$173M | $3.0B | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $449,000 | -$18M | -$48M | $2.8B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +78.1% | +75.2% | +66.3% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.5% | -15.6% | -27.2% | +30.5% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.1% | -34.3% | -25.7% | +28.2% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -3.4% | -7.1% | +26.8% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.2% | +41.2% | +12.3% | +23.0% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -6.3% | -100.0% | +18.8% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 63% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ISRG offers better value at 2.65x vs MDT's 35.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $7.9B | $1.9B | $161.1B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46M | $7.9B | $2.1B | $158.0B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.74x | -40.90x | -13.80x | 57.62x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 43.35x | 13.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.65x | 35.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 43.62x | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 15.47x | 2.92x | 16.00x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 11.69x | 5.51x | 9.17x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 203.79x | — | — | 64.67x | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. SRTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs GKOS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.1% | -26.5% | -50.8% | +16.9% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.4% | -20.1% | -16.5% | +14.8% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.3% | -9.2% | -16.4% | +15.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.7% | -10.3% | -28.9% | +16.5% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.21x | 0.85x | 0.02x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $49M | $187M | -$3.1B | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $91M | $103M | $3.4B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $680,000 | $140M | $290M | $303M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -18.69x | -96.80x | — | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GKOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs ISRG's -15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.2% | +21.2% | +28.3% | -19.3% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | +52.0% | +1.1% | -15.4% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.9% | +128.7% | -75.7% | +49.6% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | +61.5% | -91.3% | +58.7% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.7% | +457.1% | +30.3% | +554.2% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | +31.7% | -37.6% | +14.4% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GKOS and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs SRTS's 69.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.16x | 2.15x | 1.00x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.92 | $146.75 | $20.06 | $603.88 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.03 | $73.16 | $9.82 | $427.84 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.4% | +91.4% | +83.9% | +75.1% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 63.0 | 69.8 | 42.4 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 678K | 1.5M | 1.8M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $146.67 | $33.50 | $622.60 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 15 | 55 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +3.2% |
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SRTS vs GKOS vs NVCR vs ISRG vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 3% for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT?
On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.
6x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 13. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. wins at 1. 99x versus Medtronic plc's 35. 17x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +549. 2% versus SRTS's -47. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 406% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.
3% versus -34. 3% for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medtronic plc grew EPS 30. 8% year-over-year, compared to -214. 6% for Sensus Healthcare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GKOS leads at 21. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -37. 0% for Glaukos Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -37. 5% for SRTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 99x versus Medtronic plc's 35. 17x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 43. 3x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. SRTS, GKOS, NVCR, ISRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SRTS or GKOS or NVCR or ISRG or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42), 3. 6% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +24. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRTS and GKOS and NVCR and ISRG and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while SRTS, GKOS, NVCR, ISRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.