Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SRXH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs OPRX vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Distribution
SRXH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs OPRX vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $124M | $92.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $109M | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-168M | $153M | $5M | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | — | 65.4% | 67.3% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | — | 12.3% | 10.7% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | 7.0x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $22M | $70M | $5M | $7.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $194M | $1.12B | $23M | $5.69B |
SRXH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs OPRX vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRx Health Solution… (SRXH) | 100 | 5.8 | -94.2% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 221.9 | +121.9% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 123.0 | +23.0% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRXH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs OPRX vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRXH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 28.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +110.4% vs SRXH's -84.6%
ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs SRXH's -9.4%
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 124.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 19.3x)
MCK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 0.4%
- 348.1% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- Beta 0.04 vs OPRX's 2.28
- 0.4% yield; 17-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs SRXH's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs OPRX's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 17-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs SRXH's -84.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
SRXH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs OPRX vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SRXH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs OPRX vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCK leads in 3 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 1 • SRXH leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • OPRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $403.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SRXH's -9.4%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119M | $0 | $1.6B | $109M | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$112M | $212M | $16M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$168M | $153M | $5M | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$151M | $392M | $12M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | — | +65.4% | +67.3% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | — | +12.3% | +10.7% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | — | +9.8% | +4.7% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | — | +25.1% | +10.6% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +28.2% | -0.2% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +91.5% | -4.1% | — | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SRXH and DBVT and OPRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.6x trailing earnings, OPRX trades at a 16% valuation discount to MCK's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCK's 18.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $124M | $92.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $105M | $93.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | -0.76x | 24.76x | 24.56x | 29.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 7.04x | 19.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | 6.55x | 18.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | — | 4.00x | 1.13x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x | 3.28x | 0.98x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | — | 12.28x | 6.62x | 17.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. OPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 8/9 vs SRXH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -130.2% | +8.8% | +4.2% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.4% | -89.0% | +5.4% | +3.0% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.1% | — | +18.9% | +7.1% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.8% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +7.6% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $37M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$19M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $194M | $1.1B | $23M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $22M | $70M | $5M | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.83x | -189.82x | 32.30x | 1.26x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $38,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $536 for SRXH. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs SRXH's -84.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCK at 27.3% vs SRXH's -62.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.9% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -46.6% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.6% | +110.4% | +16.5% | -30.1% | +4.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -54.4% | +106.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -87.3% | +286.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -87.0% | -11.0% | +110.5% | +348.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.3% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -23.0% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRXH and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRXH is the less volatile stock with a -0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRX's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SRXH's 9.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.32x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 2.28x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.25 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $22.25 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.08 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $5.54 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.0% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +29.8% | +75.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 46.9 | 16.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22.0M | 252K | 2.3M | 476K | 757K |
Analyst Outlook
MCK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", OPRX as "Buy", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44). MCK is the only dividend payer here at 0.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $44.00 | $17.00 | $1006.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 28 | 15 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +3.4% |
MCK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALKS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SRXH vs DBVT vs ALKS vs OPRX vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK?
On trailing P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the cheapest at 24.
6x versus McKesson Corporation at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +286.
9%, compared to -94. 6% for SRx Health Solutions Inc. (SRXH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +348. 1% versus SRXH's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 32β versus OptimizeRx Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning OPRX is approximately -805% more volatile than SRXH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRX leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -9. 4% for SRx Health Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -4. 9% for SRXH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for McKesson Corporation — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK?
In this comparison, MCK (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SRXH, DBVT, ALKS, OPRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SRXH or DBVT or ALKS or OPRX or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 32)). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRXH: -94. 6%, OPRX: +110. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRXH and DBVT and ALKS and OPRX and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRXH is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.