Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SRXH vs OPRX vs DOCS vs PHVS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Biotechnology
SRXH vs OPRX vs DOCS vs PHVS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1M | $124M | $5.24B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119M | $109M | $638M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $5M | $239M | $-166M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 67.3% | 89.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 10.7% | 37.4% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.0x | 16.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $39M | $5M | $12M | $861K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $23M | $210M | $281M |
SRXH vs OPRX vs DOCS vs PHVS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRx Health Solution… (SRXH) | 100 | 5.8 | -94.2% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRXH vs OPRX vs DOCS vs PHVS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRXH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 74.1%
- 28.4% revenue growth vs PHVS's -23.2%
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
DOCS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 37.5% margin vs SRXH's -9.4%
- 20.7% ROA vs PHVS's -49.0%
PHVS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.02
- 2.3% 10Y total return vs OPRX's 110.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 12.60x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 12.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs PHVS's -23.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs SRXH's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs OPRX's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.6% vs SRXH's -84.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs PHVS's -49.0% |
SRXH vs OPRX vs DOCS vs PHVS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SRXH vs OPRX vs DOCS vs PHVS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPRX leads 1 • PHVS leads 1 • SRXH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS and PHVS operate at a comparable scale, with $638M and $0 in trailing revenue. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SRXH's -9.4%. On growth, DOCS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119M | $109M | $638M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $16M | $250M | -$86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $5M | $239M | -$166M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $12M | $314M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +67.3% | +89.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +10.7% | +37.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | +4.7% | +37.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +10.6% | +49.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.2% | +9.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -16.2% | +22.1% |
Valuation Metrics
OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, DOCS trades at a 5% valuation discount to OPRX's 24.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DOCS's 21.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $124M | $5.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $105M | $5.0B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | 24.56x | 23.45x | -10.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.04x | 16.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.30x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.55x | 21.14x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.13x | 9.18x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.98x | 4.84x | 5.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | 6.62x | 19.64x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-53 for PHVS. PHVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPRX's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs PHVS's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.2% | +24.4% | -53.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.4% | +3.0% | +20.7% | -49.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.1% | +7.1% | +20.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.8% | +7.6% | +22.3% | -44.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.01x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $37M | -$19M | -$197M | -$280M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $23M | $210M | $281M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $5M | $12M | $861,470 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.83x | 1.26x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PHVS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PHVS five years ago would be worth $13,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $536 for SRXH. Over the past 12 months, PHVS leads with a +73.6% total return vs SRXH's -84.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PHVS at 47.4% vs SRXH's -62.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.9% | -46.6% | -39.9% | +12.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.6% | -30.1% | -55.4% | +73.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -54.4% | -24.2% | +220.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -87.3% | -50.9% | +31.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +110.5% | -50.9% | +2.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.3% | -23.0% | -8.8% | +47.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRXH and PHVS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRXH is the less volatile stock with a -0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRX's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PHVS currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs SRXH's 9.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.32x | 2.28x | 1.03x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.25 | $22.25 | $76.51 | $31.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.08 | $5.54 | $20.55 | $14.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.0% | +29.8% | +34.0% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 46.9 | 60.1 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22.0M | 476K | 2.7M | 227K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPRX as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy", PHVS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 47.1% for PHVS (target: $44).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $42.79 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 22 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.3% | 0.0% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SRXH vs OPRX vs DOCS vs PHVS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 8% for OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX). Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS?
On trailing P/E, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus OptimizeRx Corporation at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS?
Over the past 5 years, Pharvaris N.
V. (PHVS) delivered a total return of +31. 2%, compared to -94. 6% for SRx Health Solutions Inc. (SRXH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRX returned +110. 5% versus SRXH's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 32β versus OptimizeRx Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning OPRX is approximately -805% more volatile than SRXH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pharvaris N. V. (PHVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for OptimizeRx Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus 18. 8% for OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to 5. 7% for Pharvaris N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRX leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -9. 4% for SRx Health Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -4. 9% for SRXH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Doximity, Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SRXH or OPRX or DOCS or PHVS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 32)). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRXH: -94. 6%, OPRX: +110. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRXH and OPRX and DOCS and PHVS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRXH is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PHVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.