SSB vs UMBF

For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 57. 0% for SouthState Corporation (SSB). SouthState Corporation (SSB) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SouthState Corporation (SSB) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the cheapest at 12.

4x versus UMB Financial Corporation at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, SouthState Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SouthState Corporation wins at 0. 35x versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) delivered a total return of +41.

5%, compared to +20. 3% for SouthState Corporation (SSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UMBF returned +165. 1% versus SSB's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

02β versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning UMBF is approximately 16% more volatile than SSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SouthState Corporation (SSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 49% for UMB Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.

5% versus 57. 0% for SouthState Corporation (SSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SouthState Corporation grew EPS 12. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 6% for UMB Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

3% net margin versus 15. 8% for UMB Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSB leads at 27. 9% versus 20. 3% for UMBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SouthState Corporation (SSB) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for UMB Financial Corporation — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSB: 21. 3% to $118. 20.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SouthState Corporation (SSB) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 1. 4% for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).

For long-horizon retirement investors, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

02), 2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSB: +67. 9%, UMBF: +165. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.