Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SSBI vs CBNK vs CZWI vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SSBI vs CBNK vs CZWI vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $90M | $544M | $204M | $2.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $304M | $90M | $902M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $57M | $14M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 73.6% | 54.7% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 24.7% | 7.0% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 9.8x | 11.6x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $52M | $52M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $31M | $119M | $185M |
SSBI vs CBNK vs CZWI vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit State Bank (SSBI) | 100 | 165.9 | +65.9% |
| Capital Bancorp, In… (CBNK) | 100 | 311.9 | +211.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 308.6 | +208.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 154.0 | +54.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSBI vs CBNK vs CZWI vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSBI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5%
CBNK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 60.4%
- 173.5% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 148.3%
- PEG 0.77 vs CZWI's 2.29
- NIM 5.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs CBNK's 0.84
- +56.9% vs CBNK's +8.3%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.77 vs 1.61 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs CBNK's 0.84 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.9% vs CBNK's +8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% |
SSBI vs CBNK vs CZWI vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SSBI vs CBNK vs CZWI vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBNK leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • SSBI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBNK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 15.3x SSBI's $59M. CBNK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSBI's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $304M | $90M | $902M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $79M | $9M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $57M | $14M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $67M | $11M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +73.6% | +54.7% | +73.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +24.7% | +7.0% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +18.8% | +16.0% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +22.2% | +12.4% | +24.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +102.2% | +63.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CBNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, CBNK trades at a 32% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBNK offers better value at 0.77x vs CZWI's 2.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $544M | $204M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $565M | $137M | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.39x | 9.81x | 14.50x | 14.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.76x | 11.63x | 11.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.77x | 2.86x | 2.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.42x | 7.69x | 15.38x | 10.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 1.79x | 2.26x | 2.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.37x | 1.09x | 1.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.79x | 8.08x | 19.63x | 11.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for SSBI. SSBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBNK scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +14.8% | +7.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.7% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +12.6% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +7.9% | +0.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.13x | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$60M | $21M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $31M | $119M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $52M | $52M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 1.16x | 0.16x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,468 for SSBI. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +56.9% total return vs CBNK's +8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.4% vs SSBI's -5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | +19.9% | +22.7% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.0% | +8.3% | +56.9% | +21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | +82.8% | +148.1% | +51.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.7% | +64.5% | +66.1% | +37.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.8% | +173.5% | +148.3% | +107.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.8% | +22.3% | +35.4% | +14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSBI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSBI is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBNK's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs CBNK's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.84x | 0.50x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $36.40 | $22.62 | $48.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.40 | $26.40 | $12.83 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +91.7% | +93.6% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 60.1 | 52.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 64K | 42K | 267K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBNK as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.9% upside for CBNK (target: $37) vs -2.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.01% vs CBNK's 1.33%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.00 | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +1.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.44 | $0.37 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +3.1% | +0.4% |
CBNK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SSBI vs CBNK vs CZWI vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Capital Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +66. 1%, compared to +14. 7% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBNK returned +173. 5% versus SSBI's +73. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus Capital Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 84β — meaning CBNK is approximately -2860% more volatile than SSBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit State Bank (SSBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit State Bank grew EPS 262. 9% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 11. 6% for Summit State Bank — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBNK leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBNK: 10. 9% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
0% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield), CBNK (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SSBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSBI or CBNK or CZWI or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 8% yield, +148. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +148. 3%, CBNK: +173. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSBI and CBNK and CZWI and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBNK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. CBNK, CZWI, NBTB pay a dividend while SSBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.