Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SSII vs AEYE vs ISRG vs ALKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Software - Application
SSII vs AEYE vs ISRG vs ALKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Software - Application | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $763M | $100M | $161.07B | $1.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $40M | $10.58B | $472M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-3M | $2.98B | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 46.0% | 78.3% | 66.3% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | -19.2% | -7.9% | 30.5% | -9.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 43.8x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $721K | $303M | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $5M | $3.37B | $63M |
SSII vs AEYE vs ISRG vs ALKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SS Innovations Inte… (SSII) | 100 | 360.6 | +260.6% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 32.0 | -68.0% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 157.3 | +57.3% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSII vs AEYE vs ISRG vs ALKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 105.7%, EPS growth 40.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 207.7%
- 105.7% revenue growth vs AEYE's 14.5%
- Beta 0.01 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage
AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.29
ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SSII's 162.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 4.87x
- 28.2% margin vs SSII's -28.5%
ALKT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 43.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 105.7% revenue growth vs AEYE's 14.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 43.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs SSII's -28.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -15.4% vs SSII's -61.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs SSII's -17.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -17.7% |
SSII vs AEYE vs ISRG vs ALKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SSII vs AEYE vs ISRG vs ALKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKT leads 1 • SSII leads 1 • AEYE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 262.5x AEYE's $40M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSII's -28.5%. On growth, SSII holds the edge at +158.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $40M | $10.6B | $472M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$504,000 | $3.8B | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$3M | $3.0B | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | $2M | $2.8B | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.0% | +78.3% | +66.3% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | -7.9% | +30.5% | -9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.5% | -7.6% | +28.2% | -10.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.3% | +5.5% | +26.8% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +158.4% | +7.9% | +23.0% | +28.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.0% | +29.0% | +18.8% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ALKT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $763M | $100M | $161.1B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $763M | $96M | $158.0B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -65.50x | -32.36x | 57.62x | -37.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 43.84x | 21.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 43.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.96x | 2.49x | 16.00x | 4.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.43x | 20.91x | 9.17x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 64.67x | 45.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.2% | -47.8% | +16.9% | -14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.5% | -9.5% | +14.8% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.7% | -42.4% | +15.0% | -8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.6% | -17.7% | +16.5% | -9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.15x | 0.02x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$289,540 | -$5M | -$3.1B | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $5M | $3.4B | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $721,000 | $303M | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.35x | -2.79x | — | -3.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SSII leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SSII five years ago would be worth $38,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,977 for AEYE. Over the past 12 months, ISRG leads with a -15.4% total return vs SSII's -61.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSII at 82.1% vs AEYE's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.4% | -18.7% | -19.3% | -23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.3% | -27.9% | -15.4% | -37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +503.7% | +20.6% | +49.6% | +41.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +281.6% | -60.2% | +58.7% | -54.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.0% | +102.2% | +554.2% | -59.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +82.1% | +6.4% | +14.4% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSII and ISRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSII is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ISRG currently trades 75.1% from its 52-week high vs SSII's 33.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 2.29x | 1.02x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.87 | $16.39 | $603.88 | $31.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.02 | $5.31 | $427.84 | $14.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.1% | +49.4% | +75.1% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.1 | 61.3 | 42.4 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 194K | 1.8M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ISRG as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.3% upside for ISRG (target: $623) vs 26.2% for ALKT (target: $22).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $622.60 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 55 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALKT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SSII vs AEYE vs ISRG vs ALKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SS Innovations International, Inc.
(SSII) is the stronger pick with 105. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) offers the better valuation at 57. 6x trailing P/E (43. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT?
On forward P/E, Alkami Technology, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 21. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT?
Over the past 5 years, SS Innovations International, Inc.
(SSII) delivered a total return of +281. 6%, compared to -60. 2% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus ALKT's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SS Innovations International, Inc.
(SSII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 15791% more volatile than SSII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SS Innovations International, Inc.
(SSII) is pulling ahead at 105. 7% versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SS Innovations International, Inc. grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SSII leads at 207. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -28. 5% for SS Innovations International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -19. 2% for SSII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 43. 8x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ISRG: 37. 3% to $622. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SSII or AEYE or ISRG or ALKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SS Innovations International, Inc.
(SSII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), +162. 0% 10Y return). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSII: +162. 0%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSII and AEYE and ISRG and ALKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SSII (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology) and ISRG (Healthcare) and ALKT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SSII is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.