SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$348M
5Y Perf.+61.7%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisSSSS
ARCC
GBDC
GSBD
TPVG
JPM
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SSSS vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs TPVG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
Asset Management
Market Cap$13.83B
5Y Perf.+33.3%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$3.46B
5Y Perf.+14.1%
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$1.04B
5Y Perf.-43.1%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-45.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Banks - Diversified
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
SSSS vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs TPVG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  SSSS |  ARCC |  GBDC |  GSBD |  TPVG |  JPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $348M | $13.83B | $3.46B | $1.04B | $226M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $732.03B | $2.63B | $761M | $286M | $61M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $1.15B | $205M | $74M | $-12M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 70.8% | 75.4% | 69.5% | 72.9% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 66.2% | 57.1% | 47.2% | -35.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 2.9x | 10.1x | 9.7x | 8.2x | 6.0x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $15.99B | $4.90B | $1.88B | $469M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $924M | $24M | $43M | $20M | $343.34B |
SSSS vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs TPVG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SSSS
ARCC
GBDC
GSBD
TPVG
JPM
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) | 100 | 161.7 | +61.7% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
| Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC) | 100 | 114.1 | +14.1% |
| Goldman Sachs BDC, … (GSBD) | 100 | 56.9 | -43.1% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 54.2 | -45.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSSS vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs TPVG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SSSS leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GSBD also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇SSSS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.
The Banking Pick
SSSS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth 211.2%
- 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
- Lower P/E (2.9x vs 14.4x)
- +90.1% vs TPVG's -10.7%
Best for: growth exposure
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
The Financial Play
ARCC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: financial services exposure
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick
GBDC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 5.35x
- PEG 0.31 vs TPVG's 5.88
- Beta 0.60, yield 10.4%, current ratio 5.35x
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs JPM's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick
GSBD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 21.9%
- NIM 7.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Beta 0.41 vs SSSS's 1.54
- 21.9% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Financial Play
Among these 6 stocks, TPVG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: financial services exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs SSSS's 365.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  SSSS | 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% |
| Value | SSSS | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 14.4x) |
| Quality / Margins |  GBDC | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs JPM's 0.3% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety |  GSBD | Beta 0.41 vs SSSS's 1.54 |
| Dividends | GSBD | 21.9% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SSSS | +90.1% vs TPVG's -10.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GBDC | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs JPM's 0.3% |
SSSS vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs TPVG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
SSSS vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs TPVG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSSSSLAGGINGJPM
Who Leads Where
SSSS leads in 3 of 6 categories
ARCC leads 1 • GBDC leads 0 • GSBD leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
0leads
TPVGTriplePoint Venture G…
0leads
GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC, In…
0leads
GBDCGolub Capital BDC, In…
0leads
ARCCAres Capital Corporat…
1leads
SSSSSuRo Capital Corp.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ARCCvs GBDCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ARCC2/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SSSS3/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SSSS3/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SSSS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $732.0B annually — 12002.2x TPVG's $61M. ARCC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPVG's -19.5%.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | ARCCAres Capital Corp… | GBDCGolub Capital BDC… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… |  TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |  JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $732.0B | $2.6B | $761M | $286M | $61M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57.6B | $2.0B | $431M | $182M | -$22M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $1.1B | $205M | $74M | -$12M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5.76T | $1.1B | $313M | $199M | -$59M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +70.8% | +75.4% | +69.5% | +72.9% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +66.2% | +57.1% | +47.2% | -35.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +43.7% | +26.9% | +25.9% | -19.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +43.5% | +41.2% | +69.6% | -97.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -63.9% | -160.0% | -144.4% | -2.3% | +16.0% |
ARCC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SSSS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 71% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.30x vs TPVG's 4.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | ARCCAres Capital Corp… | GBDCGolub Capital BDC… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $348M | $13.8B | $3.5B | $1.0B | $226M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $401M | $28.9B | $8.3B | $2.9B | $675M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.70x | 10.35x | 9.36x | 8.97x | 4.57x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.88x | 10.05x | 9.68x | 8.16x | 5.96x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.01x | 0.30x | — | 4.50x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | 13.19x | 12.13x | 12.24x | 8.91x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.97x | 4.40x | 3.98x | 4.29x | 2.33x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.94x | 0.89x | 0.75x | 0.63x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.14x | 12.11x | — | 3.19x | — | 8.88x |
SSSS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SSSS leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. SSSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSBD scores 6/9 vs TPVG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | ARCCAres Capital Corp… | GBDCGolub Capital BDC… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | 0.0% | +8.1% | +5.2% | +5.1% | -3.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | 0.0% | +3.8% | +2.3% | +2.2% | -1.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | +5.7% | +5.9% | +5.3% | +7.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | +7.5% | +7.8% | +7.0% | +9.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.12x | 1.23x | 1.32x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $53M | $15.1B | $4.9B | $1.8B | $449M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $924M | $24M | $43M | $20M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $16.0B | $4.9B | $1.9B | $469M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.05x | 2.98x | 1.62x | 1.21x | -1.02x | 0.74x |
SSSS leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SSSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,665 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SSSS leads with a +90.1% total return vs TPVG's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSSS at 62.0% vs TPVG's -8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | ARCCAres Capital Corp… | GBDCGolub Capital BDC… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.8% | -3.4% | +0.4% | +3.3% | -12.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.1% | -4.9% | -2.8% | -5.4% | -10.7% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +325.1% | +31.3% | +33.1% | +4.1% | -22.4% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +44.9% | +30.9% | -10.3% | -23.3% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +365.2% | +155.7% | +58.4% | +38.1% | +85.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.0% | +9.5% | +10.0% | +1.4% | -8.1% | +33.6% |
SSSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSBD and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GSBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSSS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | ARCCAres Capital Corp… | GBDCGolub Capital BDC… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.69x | 0.60x | 0.41x | 0.65x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.98 | $23.42 | $15.63 | $12.03 | $7.50 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.11 | $17.40 | $11.77 | $8.65 | $4.48 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +82.2% | +85.0% | +76.8% | +74.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 55.9 | 55.9 | 49.5 | 49.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 5.4M | 1.4M | 1.2M | 298K | 7.0M |
Evenly matched — GSBD and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GSBD and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSSS as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy", GSBD as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.7% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -2.6% for GSBD (target: $9). For income investors, GSBD offers the higher dividend yield at 21.87% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | ARCCAres Capital Corp… | GBDCGolub Capital BDC… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $19.00 | $14.25 | $9.00 | $8.95 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 32 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.0% | +10.4% | +21.9% | +18.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $0.38 | $1.38 | $2.02 | $1.02 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.2% | +5.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
Evenly matched — GSBD and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SSSS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallSuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SSSS vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs TPVG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is the stronger pick with 646. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, SuRo Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 2. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -23. 3% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus GSBD's +38. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus SuRo Capital Corp. 's 1. 54β — meaning SSSS is approximately 278% more volatile than GSBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is pulling ahead at 646. 5% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SuRo Capital Corp. grew EPS 211. 2% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM?
SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is the more profitable company, earning 139. 9% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 139. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSSS leads at 153. 9% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSSS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60. 7% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) offers the highest yield at 21. 9%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is SSSS or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or TPVG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 21. 9% yield). SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSBD: +38. 1%, SSSS: +365. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSSS and ARCC and GBDC and GSBD and TPVG and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GSBD is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.