Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SSSS logo
SSSS
CSWC logo
CSWC
ARCC logo
ARCC
GBDC logo
GBDC
TPVG logo
TPVG
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SSSS vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$348M
5Y Perf.+61.7%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.+74.6%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.83B
5Y Perf.+33.3%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.46B
5Y Perf.+14.1%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-45.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

SSSS vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SSSS logoSSSS
CSWC logoCSWC
ARCC logoARCC
GBDC logoGBDC
TPVG logoTPVG
KO logoKO
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$348M$1.46B$13.83B$3.46B$226M$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$732.03B$222M$2.63B$761M$61M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$50M$113M$1.15B$205M$-12M$13.70B
Gross Margin0.0%77.8%70.8%75.4%72.9%61.7%
Operating Margin7.9%62.0%66.2%57.1%-35.9%29.3%
Forward P/E2.9x9.9x10.1x9.7x6.0x25.3x
Total Debt$73M$1.13B$15.99B$4.90B$469M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$29M$924M$24M$20M$10.27B

SSSS vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SSSS
CSWC
ARCC
GBDC
TPVG
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS)100161.7+61.7%
Capital Southwest C… (CSWC)100174.6+74.6%
Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC)100133.3+33.3%
Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC)100114.1+14.1%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10054.2-45.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SSSS vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SSSS leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Capital Southwest Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality. GBDC, TPVG, and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇SSSS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.
The Banking Pick

SSSS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth 211.2%
  • 365.2% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 155.7%
  • 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • Lower P/E (2.9x vs 25.3x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
The Banking Pick

CSWC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.

  • 50.9% margin vs TPVG's -19.5%
Best for: quality
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
The Financial Play

ARCC doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GBDC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 10.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 5.35x
  • PEG 0.31 vs TPVG's 5.88
  • Beta 0.60, yield 10.4%, current ratio 5.35x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 7.4% vs ARCC's 3.6%
  • 18.4% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: bank quality
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Niche Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 13.1% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.2%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSSSS logoSSSS6.5% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueSSSS logoSSSSLower P/E (2.9x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsCSWC logoCSWC50.9% margin vs TPVG's -19.5%
Stability / SafetyGBDC logoGBDCBeta 0.60 vs SSSS's 1.54
DividendsTPVG logoTPVG18.4% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)SSSS logoSSSS+90.1% vs TPVG's -10.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.2%

SSSS vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SSSSSuRo Capital Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CSWCCapital Southwest Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

ARCCAres Capital Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

GBDCGolub Capital BDC, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

SSSS vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSSSSLAGGINGTPVG

Who Leads Where

SSSS leads in 2 of 6 categories

KO leads 2 • CSWC leads 0 • ARCC leads 0 • GBDC leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • 2 tied

Explore the data ↓
TPVGTriplePoint Venture G…
0leads
GBDCGolub Capital BDC, In…
0leads
ARCCAres Capital Corporat…
0leads
CSWCCapital Southwest Cor…
0leads
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
2leads
SSSSSuRo Capital Corp.
2leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CSWC and ARCC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

SSSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $732.0B annually — 12002.2x TPVG's $61M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 50.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPVG's -19.5%.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$732.0B$222M$2.6B$761M$61M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$57.6B$143M$2.0B$431M-$22M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M$113M$1.1B$205M-$12M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5.76T-$67M$1.1B$313M-$59M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.0%+77.8%+70.8%+75.4%+72.9%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.9%+62.0%+66.2%+57.1%-35.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.0%+50.9%+43.7%+26.9%-19.5%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.9%-30.0%+43.5%+41.2%-97.1%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%+33.3%-63.9%-160.0%-2.3%+18.2%
Evenly matched — CSWC and ARCC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SSSS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 4.6x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 83% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.30x vs TPVG's 4.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$348M$1.5B$13.8B$3.5B$226M$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$401M$2.6B$28.9B$8.3B$675M$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.70x12.39x10.35x9.36x4.57x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.88x9.87x10.05x9.68x5.96x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.01x0.30x4.50x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.47x13.08x13.19x12.13x8.91x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.97x5.95x4.40x3.98x2.33x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x1.53x0.94x0.89x0.63x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.14x12.11x67.15x
SSSS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. SSSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity0.0%+11.7%+8.1%+5.2%-3.4%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets0.0%+5.5%+3.8%+2.3%-1.5%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital0.0%+7.1%+5.7%+5.9%+7.2%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed0.0%+9.3%+7.5%+7.8%+9.4%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9444447
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x1.12x1.12x1.23x1.33x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$53M$1.1B$15.1B$4.9B$449M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$29M$924M$24M$20M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$73M$1.1B$16.0B$4.9B$469M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.05x2.06x2.98x1.62x-1.02x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SSSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,665 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SSSS leads with a +90.1% total return vs TPVG's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSSS at 62.0% vs TPVG's -8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.8%+10.2%-3.4%+0.4%-12.7%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+90.1%+23.1%-4.9%-2.8%-10.7%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+325.1%+58.6%+31.3%+33.1%-22.4%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.0%+36.2%+44.9%+30.9%-23.3%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+365.2%+232.1%+155.7%+58.4%+85.3%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+62.0%+16.6%+9.5%+10.0%-8.1%+13.7%
SSSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSSS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.54x0.72x0.69x0.60x0.65x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.98$24.43$23.42$15.63$7.50$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.11$19.37$17.40$11.77$4.48$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.5%+96.4%+82.2%+85.0%+74.3%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.950.555.955.949.960.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded333K643K5.4M1.4M298K12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TPVG and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SSSS as "Buy", CSWC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.7% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -1.3% for ARCC (target: $19). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 18.40% vs ARCC's 1.99%.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$23.58$19.00$14.25$8.95$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts51032121248
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.0%+9.5%+2.0%+10.4%+18.4%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0000056
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.42$2.24$0.38$1.38$1.02$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.2%0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — TPVG and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SSSS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallSuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SSSS vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SuRo Capital Corp.

(SSSS) is the stronger pick with 646. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO?

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, SuRo Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 2. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -23. 3% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SSSS returned +365. 2% versus GBDC's +58. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus SuRo Capital Corp. 's 1. 54β — meaning SSSS is approximately -868% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SuRo Capital Corp.

(SSSS) is pulling ahead at 646. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SuRo Capital Corp. grew EPS 211. 2% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO?

SuRo Capital Corp.

(SSSS) is the more profitable company, earning 139. 9% net margin versus 27. 3% for The Coca-Cola Company — meaning it keeps 139. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSSS leads at 153. 9% versus 28. 7% for KO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSSS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 22. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60. 7% to $8. 95.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

09

Is SSSS or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or TPVG or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SSSS: +365. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SSSS and CSWC and ARCC and GBDC and TPVG and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (SSSS (Financial Services) and CSWC (Financial Services) and ARCC (Financial Services) and GBDC (Financial Services) and TPVG (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SSSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.