Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $348M | $885M | $612M | $226M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $732.03B | $819M | $112M | $61M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $-537M | $195M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 70.9% | 57.9% | 72.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | -54.1% | 118.5% | -35.9% |
| Forward P/E | 2.9x | 2.7x | 37.9x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $773M | $564M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $97M | $1M | $20M |
SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) | 100 | 161.7 | +61.7% |
| Oxford Lane Capital… (OXLC) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 150.1 | +50.1% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 54.2 | -45.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSSS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth 211.2%
- 365.2% 10Y total return vs GAIN's 285.0%
- 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -20.5%
- +90.1% vs OXLC's -37.4%
OXLC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and bank quality is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 50.9%
- NIM 22.4% vs GAIN's 4.1%
- Lower P/E (2.7x vs 2.9x)
- 50.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SSSS's 3.0%
GAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 84.5%, current ratio 0.01x
- PEG 1.26 vs TPVG's 5.88
- Beta 0.47, yield 9.6%, current ratio 0.01x
- Beta 0.47 vs SSSS's 1.54
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -20.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.7x vs 2.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs SSSS's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 50.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SSSS's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.1% vs OXLC's -37.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0% |
SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GAIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
OXLC leads 2 • SSSS leads 1 • TPVG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $732.0B annually — 12002.2x TPVG's $61M. GAIN is the more profitable business, keeping 173.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OXLC's -65.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $732.0B | $819M | $112M | $61M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57.6B | -$444M | $133M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | -$537M | $195M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5.76T | $1.6B | $26M | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +70.9% | +57.9% | +72.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | -54.1% | +118.5% | -35.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | -65.5% | +173.6% | -19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +189.3% | +23.6% | -97.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -31.8% | +3.2% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
OXLC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, GAIN trades at a 58% valuation discount to SSSS's 7.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GAIN offers better value at 0.11x vs TPVG's 4.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $348M | $885M | $612M | $226M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $401M | $1.6B | $1.2B | $675M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.70x | -1.51x | 3.22x | 4.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.88x | 2.69x | 37.86x | 5.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.11x | 4.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | — | 5.21x | 8.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.97x | 2.26x | 8.56x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.86x | 0.89x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.14x | 1.27x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN delivers a 34.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-33 for OXLC. SSSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | 0.0% | -33.2% | +34.0% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | 0.0% | -22.5% | +16.3% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | -18.7% | +15.5% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | -22.7% | +25.3% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.75x | 0.84x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $53M | $676M | $563M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $97M | $1M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $773M | $564M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.05x | -4.77x | 3.48x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SSSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $15,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,665 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SSSS leads with a +90.1% total return vs OXLC's -37.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSSS at 62.0% vs TPVG's -8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.8% | -29.1% | +13.1% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.1% | -37.4% | +14.8% | -10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +325.1% | -6.7% | +50.8% | -22.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | -13.5% | +55.1% | -23.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +365.2% | +23.0% | +285.0% | +85.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.0% | -2.3% | +14.7% | -8.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSSS and GAIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSSS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SSSS currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs OXLC's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.66x | 0.47x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.98 | $22.30 | $17.14 | $7.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.11 | $8.01 | $13.11 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +40.7% | +89.7% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 29.5 | 41.5 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 956K | 347K | 298K |
Analyst Outlook
OXLC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSSS as "Buy", OXLC as "Buy", GAIN as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.7% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 9.5% for SSSS (target: $15). For income investors, OXLC offers the higher dividend yield at 50.93% vs SSSS's 3.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | — | $17.00 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +50.9% | +9.6% | +18.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $4.62 | $1.48 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GAIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OXLC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is the stronger pick with 646. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 5% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (37. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the cheapest at 3.
2x versus SuRo Capital Corp. at 7. 7x. On forward P/E, Oxford Lane Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 2. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Gladstone Investment Corporation wins at 1. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +55.
1%, compared to -23. 3% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SSSS returned +365. 2% versus OXLC's +23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus SuRo Capital Corp. 's 1. 54β — meaning SSSS is approximately 227% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is pulling ahead at 646. 5% versus -20. 5% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SuRo Capital Corp. grew EPS 211. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1230. 2% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 258.
5% net margin versus -149. 4% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 258. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAIN leads at 315. 8% versus -135. 4% for OXLC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSSS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) trades at 2. 7x forward P/E versus 37. 9x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60. 7% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) offers the highest yield at 50. 9%, versus 3. 0% for SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS).
09Is SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 9. 6% yield, +285. 0% 10Y return). SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +285. 0%, SSSS: +365. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSSS and OXLC and GAIN and TPVG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OXLC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.