Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SSSS logo
SSSS
OXLC logo
OXLC
GAIN logo
GAIN
TPVG logo
TPVG
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$348M
5Y Perf.+61.7%
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$885M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$612M
5Y Perf.+50.1%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-45.8%

SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SSSS logoSSSS
OXLC logoOXLC
GAIN logoGAIN
TPVG logoTPVG
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$348M$885M$612M$226M
Revenue (TTM)$732.03B$819M$112M$61M
Net Income (TTM)$50M$-537M$195M$-12M
Gross Margin0.0%70.9%57.9%72.9%
Operating Margin7.9%-54.1%118.5%-35.9%
Forward P/E2.9x2.7x37.9x6.0x
Total Debt$73M$773M$564M$469M
Cash & Equiv.$20M$97M$1M$20M

SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SSSS
OXLC
GAIN
TPVG
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS)100161.7+61.7%
Oxford Lane Capital… (OXLC)10044.1-55.9%
Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN)100150.1+50.1%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10054.2-45.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SSSS and OXLC are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Oxford Lane Capital Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. TPVG and GAIN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.
The Banking Pick

SSSS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth 211.2%
  • 365.2% 10Y total return vs GAIN's 285.0%
  • 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -20.5%
  • +90.1% vs OXLC's -37.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
The Banking Pick

OXLC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and bank quality is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 50.9%
  • NIM 22.4% vs GAIN's 4.1%
  • Lower P/E (2.7x vs 2.9x)
  • 50.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SSSS's 3.0%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corporation
The Banking Pick

GAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 84.5%, current ratio 0.01x
  • PEG 1.26 vs TPVG's 5.88
  • Beta 0.47, yield 9.6%, current ratio 0.01x
  • Beta 0.47 vs SSSS's 1.54
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSSSS logoSSSS6.5% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -20.5%
ValueOXLC logoOXLCLower P/E (2.7x vs 2.9x)
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVGEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyGAIN logoGAINBeta 0.47 vs SSSS's 1.54
DividendsOXLC logoOXLC50.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SSSS's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)SSSS logoSSSS+90.1% vs OXLC's -37.4%
Efficiency (ROA)TPVG logoTPVGEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLC's 2.0%

SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOXLCLAGGINGTPVG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

SSSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $732.0B annually — 12002.2x TPVG's $61M. GAIN is the more profitable business, keeping 173.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OXLC's -65.5%.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.OXLC logoOXLCOxford Lane Capit…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$732.0B$819M$112M$61M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$57.6B-$444M$133M-$22M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M-$537M$195M-$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5.76T$1.6B$26M-$59M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.0%+70.9%+57.9%+72.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.9%-54.1%+118.5%-35.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.0%-65.5%+173.6%-19.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.9%+189.3%+23.6%-97.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%-31.8%+3.2%-2.3%
GAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OXLC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 3.2x trailing earnings, GAIN trades at a 58% valuation discount to SSSS's 7.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GAIN offers better value at 0.11x vs TPVG's 4.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.OXLC logoOXLCOxford Lane Capit…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Market CapShares × price$348M$885M$612M$226M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$401M$1.6B$1.2B$675M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.70x-1.51x3.22x4.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.88x2.69x37.86x5.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.11x4.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.47x5.21x8.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.97x2.26x8.56x2.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x0.86x0.89x0.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.14x1.27x
OXLC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GAIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

GAIN delivers a 34.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-33 for OXLC. SSSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.OXLC logoOXLCOxford Lane Capit…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity0.0%-33.2%+34.0%-3.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets0.0%-22.5%+16.3%-1.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital0.0%-18.7%+15.5%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed0.0%-22.7%+25.3%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94444
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.75x0.84x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$53M$676M$563M$449M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$97M$1M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$73M$773M$564M$469M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.05x-4.77x3.48x-1.02x
GAIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SSSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $15,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,665 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SSSS leads with a +90.1% total return vs OXLC's -37.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSSS at 62.0% vs TPVG's -8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.OXLC logoOXLCOxford Lane Capit…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.8%-29.1%+13.1%-12.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+90.1%-37.4%+14.8%-10.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+325.1%-6.7%+50.8%-22.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.0%-13.5%+55.1%-23.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+365.2%+23.0%+285.0%+85.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+62.0%-2.3%+14.7%-8.1%
SSSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SSSS and GAIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSSS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SSSS currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs OXLC's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.OXLC logoOXLCOxford Lane Capit…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.54x0.66x0.47x0.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.98$22.30$17.14$7.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.11$8.01$13.11$4.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.5%+40.7%+89.7%+74.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.929.541.549.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded333K956K347K298K
Evenly matched — SSSS and GAIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OXLC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SSSS as "Buy", OXLC as "Buy", GAIN as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.7% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 9.5% for SSSS (target: $15). For income investors, OXLC offers the higher dividend yield at 50.93% vs SSSS's 3.03%.

MetricSSSS logoSSSSSuRo Capital Corp.OXLC logoOXLCOxford Lane Capit…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$17.00$8.95
# AnalystsCovering analysts54712
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.0%+50.9%+9.6%+18.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0400
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.42$4.62$1.48$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.3%0.0%0.0%
OXLC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GAIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OXLC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallOxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SSSS vs OXLC vs GAIN vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SuRo Capital Corp.

(SSSS) is the stronger pick with 646. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 5% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (37. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?

On trailing P/E, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the cheapest at 3.

2x versus SuRo Capital Corp. at 7. 7x. On forward P/E, Oxford Lane Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 2. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Gladstone Investment Corporation wins at 1. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?

Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +55.

1%, compared to -23. 3% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SSSS returned +365. 2% versus OXLC's +23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

47β versus SuRo Capital Corp. 's 1. 54β — meaning SSSS is approximately 227% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SuRo Capital Corp.

(SSSS) is pulling ahead at 646. 5% versus -20. 5% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SuRo Capital Corp. grew EPS 211. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1230. 2% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?

Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 258.

5% net margin versus -149. 4% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 258. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAIN leads at 315. 8% versus -135. 4% for OXLC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSSS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) trades at 2. 7x forward P/E versus 37. 9x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60. 7% to $8. 95.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) offers the highest yield at 50. 9%, versus 3. 0% for SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS).

09

Is SSSS or OXLC or GAIN or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

47), 9. 6% yield, +285. 0% 10Y return). SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +285. 0%, SSSS: +365. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SSSS and OXLC and GAIN and TPVG?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SSSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OXLC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.