SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$348M
5Y Perf.+61.7%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisSSSS
TPVG
GSBD
HTGC
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SSSS vs TPVG vs GSBD vs HTGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-45.8%
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$1.04B
5Y Perf.-43.1%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$2.90B
5Y Perf.+48.0%
SSSS vs TPVG vs GSBD vs HTGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  SSSS |  TPVG |  GSBD |  HTGC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $348M | $226M | $1.04B | $2.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $732.03B | $61M | $286M | $578M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $-12M | $74M | $289M |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 72.9% | 69.5% | 88.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | -35.9% | 47.2% | 65.8% |
| Forward P/E | 2.9x | 6.0x | 8.2x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $469M | $1.88B | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $20M | $43M | $57M |
SSSS vs TPVG vs GSBD vs HTGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SSSS
TPVG
GSBD
HTGC
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) | 100 | 161.7 | +61.7% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 54.2 | -45.8% |
| Goldman Sachs BDC, … (GSBD) | 100 | 56.9 | -43.1% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 148.0 | +48.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSSS vs TPVG vs GSBD vs HTGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SSSS leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GSBD also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇SSSS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SSSS
SuRo Capital Corp.
The Banking Pick
SSSS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth 211.2%
- 365.2% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 164.1%
- 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs GSBD's 26.0%
- Lower P/E (2.9x vs 8.1x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick
TPVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2%
Best for: quality and efficiency
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick
GSBD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 21.9%
- Beta 0.41, yield 21.9%, current ratio 0.95x
- Beta 0.41 vs SSSS's 1.54
- 21.9% yield, vs SSSS's 3.0%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
The Banking Pick
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, current ratio 1.44x
- NIM 9.1% vs TPVG's 7.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  SSSS | 6.5% NII/revenue growth vs GSBD's 26.0% |
| Value | SSSS | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 8.1x) |
| Quality / Margins |  TPVG | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety |  GSBD | Beta 0.41 vs SSSS's 1.54 |
| Dividends | GSBD | 21.9% yield, vs SSSS's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SSSS | +90.1% vs TPVG's -10.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TPVG | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2% |
SSSS vs TPVG vs GSBD vs HTGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSSSSLAGGINGTPVG
Who Leads Where
SSSS leads in 2 of 6 categories
HTGC leads 1 • GSBD leads 1 • TPVG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓TPVGTriplePoint Venture G…
0leads
HTGCHercules Capital, Inc.
1leads
GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC, In…
1leads
SSSSSuRo Capital Corp.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GSBDvs HTGCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HTGC3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SSSS3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SSSS5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
GSBD1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTGC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $732.0B annually — 12002.2x TPVG's $61M. HTGC is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPVG's -19.5%.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | HTGCHercules Capital,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $732.0B | $61M | $286M | $578M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57.6B | -$22M | $182M | $381M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | -$12M | $74M | $289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5.76T | -$59M | $199M | -$352M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +72.9% | +69.5% | +88.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | -35.9% | +47.2% | +65.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | -19.5% | +25.9% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | -97.1% | +69.6% | -60.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -2.3% | -144.4% | -20.7% |
HTGC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SSSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 49% valuation discount to GSBD's 9.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SSSS's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HTGC's 14.1x.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | HTGCHercules Capital,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $348M | $226M | $1.0B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $401M | $675M | $2.9B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.70x | 4.57x | 8.97x | 8.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.88x | 5.96x | 8.16x | 8.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.50x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | 8.91x | 12.24x | 14.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.97x | 2.33x | 4.29x | 5.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.63x | 0.75x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.14x | — | 3.19x | — |
SSSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SSSS and HTGC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTGC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. SSSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSBD scores 6/9 vs TPVG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | HTGCHercules Capital,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | 0.0% | -3.4% | +5.1% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | 0.0% | -1.5% | +2.2% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | +7.2% | +5.3% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | +9.4% | +7.0% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.33x | 1.32x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $53M | $449M | $1.8B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $20M | $43M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $469M | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.05x | -1.02x | 1.21x | 4.34x |
Evenly matched — SSSS and HTGC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SSSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTGC five years ago would be worth $14,469 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,665 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SSSS leads with a +90.1% total return vs TPVG's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSSS at 62.0% vs TPVG's -8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | HTGCHercules Capital,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.8% | -12.7% | +3.3% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.1% | -10.7% | -5.4% | -3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +325.1% | -22.4% | +4.1% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | -23.3% | -10.3% | +44.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +365.2% | +85.3% | +38.1% | +164.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.0% | -8.1% | +1.4% | +12.9% |
SSSS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSSS and GSBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GSBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSSS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SSSS currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | HTGCHercules Capital,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.65x | 0.41x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.98 | $7.50 | $12.03 | $19.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.11 | $4.48 | $8.65 | $13.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +74.3% | +76.8% | +78.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 49.9 | 49.5 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 298K | 1.2M | 1.7M |
Evenly matched — SSSS and GSBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
GSBD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSSS as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", GSBD as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.7% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -2.6% for GSBD (target: $9). For income investors, GSBD offers the higher dividend yield at 21.87% vs SSSS's 3.03%.
| Metric | SSSSSuRo Capital Corp. | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… | GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC… | HTGCHercules Capital,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $8.95 | $9.00 | $17.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 12 | 9 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +18.4% | +21.9% | +9.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $1.02 | $2.02 | $1.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.0% | +0.2% |
GSBD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SSSS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HTGC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallSuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SSSS vs TPVG vs GSBD vs HTGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is the stronger pick with 646. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 0% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. at 9. 0x. On forward P/E, SuRo Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 2. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC?
Over the past 5 years, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) delivered a total return of +44. 7%, compared to -23. 3% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SSSS returned +365. 2% versus GSBD's +38. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus SuRo Capital Corp. 's 1. 54β — meaning SSSS is approximately 278% more volatile than GSBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is pulling ahead at 646. 5% versus 26. 0% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SuRo Capital Corp. grew EPS 211. 2% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for Hercules Capital, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC?
SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) is the more profitable company, earning 139. 9% net margin versus 49. 2% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. — meaning it keeps 139. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSSS leads at 153. 9% versus 66. 7% for HTGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSSS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SuRo Capital Corp.
(SSSS) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 2x for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60. 7% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) offers the highest yield at 21. 9%, versus 3. 0% for SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS).
09Is SSSS or TPVG or GSBD or HTGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 21. 9% yield). SuRo Capital Corp. (SSSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSBD: +38. 1%, SSSS: +365. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSSS and TPVG and GSBD and HTGC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.