Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SSYS vs HON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
SSYS vs HON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $790M | $137.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $561M | $36.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-127M | $4.10B |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.9% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | 78.7x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $34.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $12.49B |
SSYS vs HON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 148.7 | +48.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSYS vs HON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSYS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.07x
HON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth -15.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 134.6% 10Y total return vs SSYS's -56.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs SSYS's -8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 78.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs SSYS's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SSYS's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.5% vs SSYS's -4.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs SSYS's -11.9%, ROIC 12.6% vs -8.2% |
SSYS vs HON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SSYS vs HON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.8B annually — 65.5x SSYS's $561M. HON is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSYS's -22.7%. On growth, SSYS holds the edge at -2.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $561M | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$127M | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -75.7% | -41.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SSYS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $790M | $137.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $752M | $159.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.44x | 29.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 78.72x | 20.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 16.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 3.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 9.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HON leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HON delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-15 for SSYS. SSYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HON scores 6/9 vs SSYS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.3% | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.9% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.2% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.4% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 2.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $22.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $12.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $34.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.69x | 3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HON leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HON five years ago would be worth $10,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,727 for SSYS. Over the past 12 months, HON leads with a +5.5% total return vs SSYS's -4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HON at 5.2% vs SSYS's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.6% | +5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.5% | +16.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.7% | +3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.1% | +134.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.6% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
HON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSYS's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HON currently trades 87.4% from its 52-week high vs SSYS's 72.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.81 | $248.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.34 | $186.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.2% | +87.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 32.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 797K | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SSYS as "Buy" and HON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.9% upside for SSYS (target: $14) vs 12.5% for HON (target: $244). HON is the only dividend payer here at 2.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $243.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +2.8% |
HON leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SSYS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SSYS vs HON: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSYS or HON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger pick with 7. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSYS or HON?
On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSYS or HON?
Over the past 5 years, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) delivered a total return of +3. 6%, compared to -52. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HON returned +134. 6% versus SSYS's -56. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSYS or HON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Stratasys Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning SSYS is approximately 141% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSYS or HON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is pulling ahead at 7. 8% versus -8. 8% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stratasys Ltd. grew EPS 5. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for Honeywell International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HON leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSYS or HON?
Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus -21. 0% for Stratasys Ltd. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HON leads at 17. 5% versus -15. 0% for SSYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSYS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSYS or HON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 78. 7x for Stratasys Ltd. — 58. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSYS: 45. 9% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSYS or HON?
In this comparison, HON (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SSYS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSYS or HON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 1% yield, +134. 6% 10Y return). Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HON: +134. 6%, SSYS: -56. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSYS and HON?
These companies operate in different sectors (SSYS (Technology) and HON (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
HON pays a dividend while SSYS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.