SSYS vs NNDM

For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 2. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Analysts rate Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Stratasys Ltd.

(SSYS) delivered a total return of -52. 7%, compared to -70. 7% for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SSYS returned -56. 1% versus NNDM's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 74β versus Stratasys Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning SSYS is approximately 3% more volatile than NNDM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Stratasys Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 2. 6% versus -8. 8% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stratasys Ltd. grew EPS 5. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 76. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Stratasys Ltd.

(SSYS) is the more profitable company, earning -21. 0% net margin versus -166. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps -21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSYS leads at -15. 0% versus -149. 6% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSYS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Stratasys Ltd.

(SSYS) trades at 78. 7x forward P/E versus 190. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 111. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNDM: -97. 4%, SSYS: -56. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.