Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STAA vs ALGN vs TMDX vs EW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
STAA vs ALGN vs TMDX vs EW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.35B | $12.06B | $2.52B | $47.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $239M | $4.10B | $636M | $6.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-80M | $430M | $172M | $1.07B |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 67.7% | 59.1% | 78.1% |
| Operating Margin | -33.3% | 14.4% | 14.9% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 70.2x | 14.9x | 29.9x | 27.5x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $114M | $470M | $705M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $153M | $1.08B | $488M | $2.94B |
STAA vs ALGN vs TMDX vs EW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAAR Surgical Comp… (STAA) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Align Technology, I… (ALGN) | 100 | 68.6 | -31.4% |
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 551.9 | +451.9% |
| Edwards Lifescience… (EW) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STAA vs ALGN vs TMDX vs EW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STAA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.54
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 4.55x
- Beta 0.54, current ratio 4.55x
- Beta 0.54 vs ALGN's 1.66
ALGN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.9x vs 27.5x)
TMDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 226.0% 10Y total return vs STAA's 273.7%
- 37.1% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7%
- 27.0% margin vs STAA's -33.6%
EW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 27.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs STAA's -33.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs ALGN's 1.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.3% vs TMDX's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs STAA's -17.8%, ROIC 18.8% vs -13.2% |
STAA vs ALGN vs TMDX vs EW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STAA vs ALGN vs TMDX vs EW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TMDX leads in 1 of 6 categories
ALGN leads 1 • STAA leads 0 • EW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EW is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 25.3x STAA's $239M. TMDX is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STAA's -33.6%. On growth, TMDX holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $239M | $4.1B | $636M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$71M | $790M | $115M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$80M | $430M | $172M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | $717M | $151M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +67.7% | +59.1% | +78.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.3% | +14.4% | +14.9% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.6% | +10.5% | +27.0% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +17.5% | +23.8% | +22.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | +6.2% | +21.2% | +13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.8% | +23.6% | -71.4% | -75.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ALGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, TMDX trades at a 67% valuation discount to EW's 45.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALGN's 13.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EW's 25.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $12.1B | $2.5B | $47.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $11.1B | $2.5B | $45.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.84x | 29.80x | 14.97x | 45.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.16x | 14.85x | 29.86x | 27.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 6.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.92x | 18.42x | 25.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.63x | 2.99x | 4.16x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.93x | 3.02x | 6.25x | 4.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.57x | 18.86x | 35.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ALGN and TMDX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-23 for STAA. ALGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMDX's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALGN scores 7/9 vs STAA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.2% | +10.7% | +41.9% | +10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.8% | +6.9% | +15.8% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | +15.4% | +18.8% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.2% | +14.5% | +12.6% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.03x | 0.99x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$115M | -$965M | -$19M | -$2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $153M | $1.1B | $488M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $114M | $470M | $705M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 389.13x | 33.15x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — STAA and TMDX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $30,074 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,980 for STAA. Over the past 12 months, STAA leads with a +40.3% total return vs TMDX's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMDX at 0.9% vs STAA's -26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.6% | +7.9% | -40.6% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.3% | -2.2% | -23.9% | +10.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.7% | -45.0% | +2.8% | -7.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | -71.9% | +200.7% | -10.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +273.7% | +122.8% | +226.0% | +133.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.1% | -18.1% | +0.9% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STAA and EW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALGN's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EW currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs TMDX's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.66x | 1.59x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.81 | $208.31 | $156.00 | $87.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.64 | $122.00 | $70.00 | $72.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +80.8% | +46.7% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 44.6 | 21.8 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.1M | 1.1M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STAA as "Hold", ALGN as "Buy", TMDX as "Buy", EW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for TMDX (target: $145) vs -15.9% for STAA (target: $23).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.95 | $203.60 | $144.75 | $96.53 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 33 | 12 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.9% | +0.0% | +1.9% |
TMDX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ALGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
STAA vs ALGN vs TMDX vs EW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW?
On trailing P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Edwards Lifesciences Corporation at 45. 2x. On forward P/E, Align Technology, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +200. 7%, compared to -80. 2% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STAA returned +273. 7% versus ALGN's +122. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Align Technology, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning ALGN is approximately 206% more volatile than STAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 99% for TransMedics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to -295. 1% for STAAR Surgical Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW?
TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -33. 6% for STAAR Surgical Company — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EW leads at 27. 0% versus -19. 2% for STAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EW leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Align Technology, Inc.
(ALGN) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 70. 2x for STAAR Surgical Company — 55. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMDX: 98. 6% to $144. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is STAA or ALGN or TMDX or EW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +273. 7% 10Y return). Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAA: +273. 7%, ALGN: +122. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STAA and ALGN and TMDX and EW?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALGN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; EW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.