Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STAA vs TMDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
STAA vs TMDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.35B | $2.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $239M | $636M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-80M | $172M |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 59.1% |
| Operating Margin | -33.3% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | 70.2x | 29.9x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $470M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $153M | $488M |
STAA vs TMDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAAR Surgical Comp… (STAA) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 551.9 | +451.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STAA vs TMDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STAA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.54
- 273.7% 10Y total return vs TMDX's 226.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 4.55x
TMDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 37.1% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7%
- Lower P/E (29.9x vs 70.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.9x vs 70.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs STAA's -33.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs TMDX's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.3% vs TMDX's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs STAA's -17.8%, ROIC 18.8% vs -13.2% |
STAA vs TMDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STAA vs TMDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX is the larger business by revenue, generating $636M annually — 2.7x STAA's $239M. TMDX is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STAA's -33.6%. On growth, TMDX holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $239M | $636M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$71M | $115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$80M | $172M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +59.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.3% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.6% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | +21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.8% | -71.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STAA and TMDX each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.84x | 14.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.16x | 29.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.63x | 4.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.93x | 6.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-23 for STAA. STAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMDX's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMDX scores 7/9 vs STAA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.2% | +41.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.8% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | +18.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.2% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$115M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $153M | $488M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $470M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 33.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — STAA and TMDX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $30,074 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,980 for STAA. Over the past 12 months, STAA leads with a +40.3% total return vs TMDX's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMDX at 0.9% vs STAA's -26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.6% | -40.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.3% | -23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.7% | +2.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | +200.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +273.7% | +226.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.1% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
STAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TMDX's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STAA currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs TMDX's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.81 | $156.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.64 | $70.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +46.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 21.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STAA as "Hold" and TMDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for TMDX (target: $145) vs -15.9% for STAA (target: $23).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.95 | $144.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.0% |
TMDX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STAA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
STAA vs TMDX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STAA or TMDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STAA or TMDX?
On forward P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 29. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STAA or TMDX?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +200. 7%, compared to -80. 2% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STAA returned +273. 7% versus TMDX's +226. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STAA or TMDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus TransMedics Group, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning TMDX is approximately 193% more volatile than STAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 99% for TransMedics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STAA or TMDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to -295. 1% for STAAR Surgical Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STAA or TMDX?
TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -33. 6% for STAAR Surgical Company — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMDX leads at 17. 9% versus -19. 2% for STAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STAA leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STAA or TMDX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 70. 2x for STAAR Surgical Company — 40. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMDX: 98. 6% to $144. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — STAA or TMDX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is STAA or TMDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +273. 7% 10Y return). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAA: +273. 7%, TMDX: +226. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STAA and TMDX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.