Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Banks - Diversified
STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $58M | $707M | $5.42B | $10.65B | $4.42B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $116M | $868M | $653M | $740M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-169M | $-2.04B | $-867M | $-501M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 46.7% | 0.3% | -13.6% | 19.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | 101.8% | 16.9% | -125.0% | -24.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | — | — | — | 15.4x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $134M | $3.65B | $280M | $824M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $658K | $122M | $547M | $234M | $43M | $343.34B |
STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAK Inc. Ordinary … (STAK) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 102.2 | +2.2% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 302.8 | +202.8% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 215.8 | +115.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 122.9 | +22.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STAK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if efficiency is your priority.
- 14.5% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC 17.9% vs -9.0%
Among these 6 stocks, BTBT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MARA doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
RIOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +182.7% vs BTBT's -10.0%
CLSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.54, Low D/E 37.9%, current ratio 4.18x
- 102.2% revenue growth vs BTBT's -30.7%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 7.1%
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.52x
- NIM 2.2% vs MARA's 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs BTBT's -30.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 15.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs MARA's -234.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs RIOT's 4.01 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.7% vs BTBT's -10.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC 17.9% vs -9.0% |
STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
STAK leads 1 • BTBT leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • RIOT leads 0 • CLSK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14817.7x STAK's $19M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -2.3%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $116M | $868M | $653M | $740M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $162M | $953M | -$450M | $244M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$169M | -$2.0B | -$867M | -$501M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$170.8B | -$385M | -$1.0B | -$1.1B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +46.7% | +0.3% | -13.6% | +19.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +101.8% | +16.9% | -125.0% | -24.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | -146.0% | -2.3% | -132.8% | -67.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | -1473.2% | -44.4% | -156.7% | -144.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | -24.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -40.6% | -113.5% | -60.0% | -2.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STAK and MARA and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 42% valuation discount to STAK's 26.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STAK's 19.7x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $58M | $707M | $5.4B | $10.7B | $4.4B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $62M | $719M | $8.5B | $10.7B | $5.2B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.50x | -7.00x | -3.85x | -14.41x | 15.39x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.65x | — | — | — | 7.80x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 6.22x | 5.98x | 16.45x | 5.77x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.20x | 6.47x | 1.45x | 3.35x | 2.52x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STAK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STAK delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-52 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs BTBT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.1% | -0.1% | -51.7% | -28.8% | -29.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.5% | -0.1% | -28.0% | -21.5% | -16.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.9% | -5.8% | -9.0% | -8.7% | +10.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.7% | -7.2% | -12.1% | -11.0% | +13.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 0.10x | 0.38x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $12M | $3.1B | $46M | $781M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $658,154 | $122M | $547M | $234M | $43M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $134M | $3.6B | $280M | $824M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.15x | 0.01x | 12.66x | -16.47x | -15.45x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,893 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +182.7% total return vs BTBT's -10.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 57.5% vs BTBT's -17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1375.9% | +6.4% | +43.5% | +98.4% | +49.3% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +142.9% | -10.0% | -1.9% | +182.7% | +87.8% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.3% | -43.6% | +21.3% | +149.8% | +290.9% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.3% | -71.1% | -50.8% | -12.7% | -7.2% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.3% | -53.0% | -63.3% | +710.6% | -80.7% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | -17.4% | +6.7% | +35.7% | +57.5% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STAK and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STAK is the less volatile stock with a -1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 4.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs BTBT's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.49x | 3.66x | 3.28x | 4.01x | 3.54x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.50 | $4.55 | $23.45 | $28.94 | $23.61 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $1.25 | $6.66 | $8.87 | $8.00 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +47.7% | +60.6% | +97.1% | +73.0% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 58.5 | 53.8 | 61.0 | 55.8 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 24.5M | 40.9M | 17.4M | 21.5M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.5% upside for BTBT (target: $6) vs -12.1% for MARA (target: $13). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.83% vs CLSK's 0.20%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $12.50 | $27.25 | $18.90 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 20 | 18 | 11 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +0.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — | $0.03 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.0% | +3.3% | +3.8% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). STAK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 7% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus STAK Inc. Ordinary Shares at 26. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -71. 1% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +710. 6% versus CLSK's -80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STAK Inc.
Ordinary Shares (STAK) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 49β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 4. 01β — meaning RIOT is approximately -369% more volatile than STAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -30. 7% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 176.
5% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. STAK, BTBT, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STAK Inc.
Ordinary Shares (STAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 49)). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAK: +56. 3%, CLSK: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STAK and BTBT and MARA and RIOT and CLSK and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (STAK (Energy) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while STAK, BTBT, MARA, RIOT, CLSK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.