Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STBA vs CNOB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
STBA vs CNOB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $1.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $569M | $606M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $134M | $80M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 18.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.0x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $311M | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $163M | $92M |
STBA vs CNOB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA) | 100 | 200.3 | +100.3% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 205.7 | +105.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STBA vs CNOB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STBA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.1%
- 125.5% 10Y total return vs CNOB's 111.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 21.2%, current ratio 6.98x
CNOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -15.9%
- 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs STBA's 0.6%
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 12.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs STBA's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 12.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs STBA's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs CNOB's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs CNOB's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.1% vs STBA's +23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs STBA's 0.4% |
STBA vs CNOB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STBA vs CNOB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STBA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNOB and STBA operate at a comparable scale, with $606M and $569M in trailing revenue. STBA is the more profitable business, keeping 23.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNOB's 13.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $569M | $606M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $168M | $122M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $134M | $80M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +53.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STBA and CNOB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, STBA trades at a 37% valuation discount to CNOB's 20.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STBA's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNOB's 23.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.76x | 20.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.96x | 9.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.17x | 23.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.67x | 15.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STBA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STBA delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. STBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STBA scores 6/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $163M | $92M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $311M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 0.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNOB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STBA five years ago would be worth $14,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,900 for CNOB. Over the past 12 months, CNOB leads with a +33.1% total return vs STBA's +23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNOB at 31.3% vs STBA's 22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.4% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.4% | +33.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.8% | +126.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | +19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.5% | +111.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.7% | +31.3% |
Risk & Volatility
STBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STBA is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.17 | $30.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.01 | $21.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 243K | 352K |
Analyst Outlook
STBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STBA as "Hold" and CNOB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.7% upside for CNOB (target: $34) vs -15.4% for STBA (target: $38). For income investors, STBA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.08% vs CNOB's 2.10%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.67 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +0.1% |
STBA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNOB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
STBA vs CNOB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STBA or CNOB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA). S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STBA or CNOB?
On trailing P/E, S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STBA or CNOB?
Over the past 5 years, S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) delivered a total return of +49. 0%, compared to +19. 0% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STBA returned +125. 5% versus CNOB's +111. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STBA or CNOB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CNOB is approximately 31% more volatile than STBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STBA or CNOB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 0. 6% for S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: S&T Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 2. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STBA or CNOB?
S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 6% net margin versus 13. 3% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STBA leads at 29. 5% versus 18. 6% for CNOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STBA leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STBA or CNOB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for S&T Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNOB: 12. 7% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STBA or CNOB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
S&T Bancorp, Inc. (STBA) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 2. 1% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB).
09Is STBA or CNOB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, S&T Bancorp, Inc.
(STBA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 3. 1% yield, +125. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STBA: +125. 5%, CNOB: +111. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STBA and CNOB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STBA is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.