Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STEC vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
STEC vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.06B | $341.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.09B | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | 4.1x |
| Total Debt | $184M | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $869M | $181.73B |
STEC vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Santech Holdings Li… (STEC) | 100 | 4827.6 | +4727.6% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 185.9 | +85.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STEC vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STEC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth -49.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.6%
- 33.1% 10Y total return vs BABA's 84.5%
- 7.7% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9%
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 1.21, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 4.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs STEC's 5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs STEC's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.6% vs BABA's +12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs STEC's 5.8%, ROIC 9.6% vs 28.6% |
STEC vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STEC vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 483.8x STEC's $2.1B. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STEC's 5.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
STEC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, STEC trades at a 92% valuation discount to BABA's 18.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STEC's 1.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BABA's 13.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $341.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $374M | $351.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.52x | 17.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.07x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.48x | 13.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.15x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.10x | 29.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STEC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $11 for STEC. STEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BABA's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs STEC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +28.6% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.7% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$685M | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $869M | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $184M | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STEC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STEC five years ago would be worth $341,463 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,453 for BABA. Over the past 12 months, STEC leads with a +958.8% total return vs BABA's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STEC at 2.2% vs BABA's 20.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +800.0% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +958.8% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3314.6% | +75.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3314.6% | -35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3314.6% | +84.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STEC and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BABA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEC's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STEC currently trades 84.0% from its 52-week high vs BABA's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.00 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.44 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.0% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.8 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 120K | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% |
STEC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BABA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
STEC vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STEC or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Santech Holdings Limited (STEC) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Santech Holdings Limited (STEC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STEC or BABA?
On trailing P/E, Santech Holdings Limited (STEC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 18. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STEC or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Santech Holdings Limited (STEC) delivered a total return of +33.
1%, compared to -35. 5% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STEC returned +33. 1% versus BABA's +84. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STEC or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus Santech Holdings Limited's 1. 63β — meaning STEC is approximately 35% more volatile than BABA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Santech Holdings Limited (STEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 23% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STEC or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Santech Holdings Limited (STEC) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to -49. 0% for Santech Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, STEC leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STEC or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus 5. 7% for Santech Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus 9. 4% for STEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEC leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — STEC or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. STEC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is STEC or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21), 1. 3% yield). Santech Holdings Limited (STEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +84. 5%, STEC: +33. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STEC and BABA?
These companies operate in different sectors (STEC (Technology) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
BABA pays a dividend while STEC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.