Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STEL vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
STEL vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.91B | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $596M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $105M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 21.4% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $419M | $1.43B |
STEL vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellar Bancorp, In… (STEL) | 100 | 183.8 | +83.8% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STEL vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STEL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 31.79x
- PEG 1.29 vs BOKF's 4.38
- Beta 0.81, yield 1.5%, current ratio 31.79x
BOKF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs STEL's 44.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs STEL's -4.7% | |
| Value | PEG 1.29 vs 4.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs STEL's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs STEL's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.3% vs BOKF's +44.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs STEL's 0.5% |
STEL vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STEL vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STEL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 5.6x STEL's $596M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.3% (STEL) to 15.6% (BOKF).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $596M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $145M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $105M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $118M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, BOKF trades at a 13% valuation discount to STEL's 18.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STEL offers better value at 1.41x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.86x | 16.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.38x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.41x | 5.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.99x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.64x | 7.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STEL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOKF delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $6 for STEL. STEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOKF scores 6/9 vs STEL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$379M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $419M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.77x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,813 for STEL. Over the past 12 months, STEL leads with a +48.3% total return vs BOKF's +44.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOKF at 21.5% vs STEL's 21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.3% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.1% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.2% | +168.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.0% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STEL and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.21 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.60 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 309K | 317K |
Analyst Outlook
BOKF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STEL as "Buy" and BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.4% upside for BOKF (target: $132) vs -21.4% for STEL (target: $30). For income investors, BOKF offers the higher dividend yield at 1.68% vs STEL's 1.51%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +0.9% |
BOKF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). STEL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
STEL vs BOKF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STEL or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL). BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STEL or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the cheapest at 16.
4x versus Stellar Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 9x. On forward P/E, BOK Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stellar Bancorp, Inc. wins at 1. 29x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STEL or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to +28. 1% for Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus STEL's +44. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STEL or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stellar Bancorp, Inc.
(STEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 27% more volatile than STEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STEL or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus -4. 7% for Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BOK Financial Corporation grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -7. 4% for Stellar Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STEL or BOKF?
Stellar Bancorp, Inc.
(STEL) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STEL leads at 21. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEL leads at 69. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STEL or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 29x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for Stellar Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BOKF: -1. 4% to $131. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — STEL or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Stellar Bancorp, Inc. (STEL).
09Is STEL or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stellar Bancorp, Inc.
(STEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STEL: +44. 2%, BOKF: +168. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STEL and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.