Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STEP vs BX vs KKR vs APO vs HLNE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management - Global
Asset Management
STEP vs BX vs KKR vs APO vs HLNE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.17B | $96.98B | $91.40B | $76.79B | $4.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.17B | $13.83B | $19.26B | $30.30B | $713M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-547M | $3.02B | $2.37B | $2.15B | $206M |
| Gross Margin | -7.6% | 86.0% | 41.8% | 88.5% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | -21.3% | 51.9% | 2.4% | 34.4% | 44.4% |
| Forward P/E | 26.6x | 20.7x | 16.9x | 14.9x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $383M | $13.31B | $54.77B | $13.36B | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $2.63B | $6M | $19.24B | $277M |
STEP vs BX vs KKR vs APO vs HLNE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) | 100 | 209.5 | +109.5% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 237.1 | +137.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 298.5 | +198.5% |
| Apollo Global Manag… (APO) | 100 | 297.7 | +197.7% |
| Hamilton Lane Incor… (HLNE) | 100 | 137.8 | +37.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STEP vs BX vs KKR vs APO vs HLNE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 65.1% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs APO's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +3.4% vs HLNE's -44.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs APO's 0.5%
BX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 6.2%
- 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%
KKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.9x vs 20.7x)
APO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs KKR's 7.3%
- PEG 0.20 vs BX's 0.99
HLNE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 28.7%, EPS growth 46.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 39.9%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 1.19, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 1.19 vs KKR's 1.66, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.1% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs APO's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs KKR's 1.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.4% vs HLNE's -44.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs APO's 0.5% |
STEP vs BX vs KKR vs APO vs HLNE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STEP vs BX vs KKR vs APO vs HLNE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BX leads in 1 of 6 categories
HLNE leads 1 • STEP leads 0 • KKR leads 0 • APO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APO is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.3B annually — 42.5x HLNE's $713M. HLNE is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STEP's -15.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $13.8B | $19.3B | $30.3B | $713M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$948M | $7.2B | $9.0B | $10.0B | $320M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$547M | $3.0B | $2.4B | $2.1B | $206M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $3.5B | $7.5B | $4.4B | $364M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +86.0% | +41.8% | +88.5% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.3% | +51.9% | +2.4% | +34.4% | +44.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +21.8% | +12.3% | +14.8% | +30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +12.6% | +49.4% | +24.6% | +43.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.6% | +41.3% | -1.7% | -5.8% | -56.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STEP and KKR and APO each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, HLNE trades at a 62% valuation discount to KKR's 43.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APO offers better value at 0.24x vs BX's 1.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $97.0B | $91.4B | $76.8B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $107.7B | $146.2B | $70.9B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.12x | 31.90x | 43.81x | 18.35x | 16.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.64x | 20.74x | 16.89x | 14.94x | 14.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.52x | — | 0.24x | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.92x | 20.51x | 6.19x | 13.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 7.01x | 4.75x | 2.53x | 5.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.23x | 4.42x | 1.20x | 1.90x | 4.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.35x | 55.58x | 9.60x | 10.30x | 13.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLNE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HLNE delivers a 15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-10 for STEP. STEP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KKR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLNE scores 7/9 vs APO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.8% | +14.3% | +3.2% | +5.5% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.4% | +6.5% | +0.6% | +0.5% | +9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.7% | +16.1% | +0.3% | +16.0% | +21.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | +16.9% | +0.1% | +8.8% | +26.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.61x | 0.67x | 0.31x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $93M | $10.7B | $54.8B | -$5.9B | $91M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $2.6B | $6M | $19.2B | $277M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $383M | $13.3B | $54.8B | $13.4B | $368M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -126.38x | 14.12x | 3.29x | 26.54x | 25.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — STEP and APO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APO five years ago would be worth $24,694 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,907 for HLNE. Over the past 12 months, STEP leads with a +3.4% total return vs HLNE's -44.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STEP at 39.5% vs HLNE's 12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.9% | -20.4% | -20.3% | -8.8% | -34.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.4% | -7.9% | -13.0% | +1.5% | -44.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.8% | +67.7% | +112.2% | +124.5% | +42.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.1% | +63.2% | +85.4% | +146.9% | +9.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.8% | +481.5% | +732.3% | +790.9% | +464.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.5% | +18.8% | +28.5% | +30.9% | +12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — APO and HLNE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HLNE is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APO currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs HLNE's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.51x | 1.66x | 1.44x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.80 | $190.09 | $153.87 | $157.28 | $179.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.58 | $101.73 | $82.67 | $99.56 | $85.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.6% | +65.1% | +66.6% | +84.7% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 50.7 | 51.4 | 60.9 | 37.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 7.0M | 6.2M | 5.1M | 839K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STEP as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy", APO as "Buy", HLNE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.1% upside for HLNE (target: $174) vs 18.1% for APO (target: $157). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.22% vs KKR's 0.78%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.50 | $156.29 | $141.14 | $157.25 | $173.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 29 | 27 | 28 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +6.2% | +0.8% | +1.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.07 | $7.70 | $0.80 | $2.14 | $2.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% | +1.0% | +6.0% |
BX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HLNE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
STEP vs BX vs KKR vs APO vs HLNE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) is the stronger pick with 65. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE?
On trailing P/E, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the cheapest at 16.
5x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 43. 8x. On forward P/E, Hamilton Lane Incorporated is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apollo Global Management, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) delivered a total return of +146. 9%, compared to +9. 1% for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +790. 9% versus STEP's +142. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
19β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning KKR is approximately 40% more volatile than HLNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 67% for KKR & Co. Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) is pulling ahead at 65. 1% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hamilton Lane Incorporated grew EPS 46. 6% year-over-year, compared to -376. 9% for StepStone Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE?
Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the more profitable company, earning 30.
5% net margin versus -15. 3% for StepStone Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus -21. 3% for STEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APO leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 6x for StepStone Group Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLNE: 95. 1% to $173. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is STEP or BX or KKR or APO or HLNE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
19), 2. 8% yield, +464. 9% 10Y return). StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLNE: +464. 9%, STEP: +142. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STEP and BX and KKR and APO and HLNE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STEP is a small-cap high-growth stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; APO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HLNE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 32%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.